Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical y block to t5

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by ilers58, Jul 14, 2014.

  1. ilers58
    Joined: Oct 22, 2012
    Posts: 9

    ilers58
    Member
    from new york

    What do I need other then the adapter plate to hook a 80s s10 t5 to my y block in my 1960 f100?
     
  2. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Pressure plate, clutch plate, pilot bearing, throwout bearing that are compatible with your flywheel and clutch fork. Then on the other end, a driveshaft the correct length with the correct yoke for the T5. Then the speedometer issues.
     
  3. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    No adapter needed, you just need to modify a stock 1960 Y-Block Truck 3 bellhousing.

    This guy can modify your bell, check his site for details; http://www.ford-y-block.com/index.html

    I just had one done by a local machinist.

    2 new holes need to be drilled and threaded slugs added for the top 2 transmission bolts

    You can use a stock clutch but you will have to change the clutch disc to match the S-10 input shaft.

    You have a few choices when it comes to the throwout bearing, you can press a bushing into the stock bearing to fit the trans or make a bushing to press onto the front bearing retainer on the transmission to fit the throwout bearing.

    I also had to have the large bellhousing hole enlarged to fit the t-5 bearing retainer
     
  4. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Says on their site that their method will not work with an S10 transmission.
     
  5. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    I'm only guessing but it sounds like the S10 bolt pattern is different than the Ford T10.

    2 bolt holes on the Ford T10 line up with the original holes on the Y-Block bell.

    I think some of the GM T-5s used the Ford bolt pattern, maybe you can swap out the cases.

    Have you read all of the T-5 threads here on the HAMB? loads of info.

    Also take a look on the Ford Truck Enthusiasts site, a bunch of the guys over there have installed T-5s behind Y-Blocks....http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/index.php
     
    mikhett likes this.
  6. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    It would take a lot more than the case, the input shaft is a different diameter, the pilot bearing would be different, the splines are different (might only require a different clutch plate). The bolt pattern between the S10 and the Ford is very different. In the later years chevy went to the ford bolt pattern.
     
  7. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    Pilot bearing could easily be made or modified, that's an easy one.

    I know there's an 11'' clutch disc from the Chevy Astro Van that will work.

    I'm not sure about the length of the S10 input shaft, even the Mustang input shaft needs to be shortened to work with the truck Y-block bellhousing.

    I knew the cases where different but I don't have 2 side by side to compare, I bought a Mustang T5 at a swap meet and then found an S-10 Tail housing ***embly at a local junkyard, I have yet to put the 2 together.
     
  8. Y-not find a 3 spd overdrive transmission that came behind that engine?????
     
  9. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

     

    Attached Files:

  10. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Can't find an S10 bolt pattern at the moment, but these are the differences in the adapters. These are for a flathead, has nothing to do with the Y-block mount, they just show the difference in the bolt pattern between an S10 and mustang T5. The first two are the mustang/ford pattern, the second two are the S10 pattern, there is a lot of difference in the bolt patterns.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Found a couple of good photos (I only mess with ford T5s, so don't have a lot of info on S10). If you were interested in going with the mustang T5 you could sell your S10 T5, the flathead guys are always looking for them and I'd think the S10 would be worth more than the mustang T5 on the market (not to me! but I'm a mustang guy).
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    If it were mine and I had the '60 bellhousing and the S10 trans I think I would modify the bell as they do for the Mustang T5, just add 2 more weld in slugs with threads. No adapter needed.
     
  13. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Better be damn good at aligning it up! This is not a simple task, that would take some skill, a lot of skill. Also, the S10 T5 is a fairly poor transmission to use behind the y-block in the first place. That is a non-world cl*** transmission and will only handle 265 ft/lbs of torque. A 1960 292 is rated at 270 lb-ft @2600 rpm stock. So that transmission is overpowered to start with. I would not put that much work into something that would have to be babied just to keeping it from breaking.
     
  14. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    Actually a pretty simple task, just machine the center hole just enough for the bearing retainer and your lined up, the 4 bolt holes just hold it in place. This has been done thousands of times by guys adapting engines and transmissions.
    I just had mine done a few weeks ago, if I had a mill I'd have done it myself and I'm not a machinist.
     
    Xtrom likes this.
  15. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    So, it is your advice to install a transmission that is rated below the torque rating of the stock engine? I work with T5s, I rebuild them, I race them and have built adaptors for them. I would never recommend this transmission on this engine, it is a VERY bad idea.
     
  16. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    I believe some of the S10 T5s are world cl***
     
  17. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    Sure why not, He didn't say he was going drag racing
     
  18. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    schulzcep likes this.
  19. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    The torque rating is below the stock engine torque output, do you understand this transmission at all? Earlier you didn't even know the bolt pattern and now your an S10 install expert? I would never even dream of using this setup. Well, good luck, hope he has enough cash to rebuild and or replace it.
     
  20. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    I understand what your saying, just trying to help the guy out.

    I'm not holding a gun to his head making him use the S10 trans, that's his choice.

    Never claimed to be a S10 install expert, however I do know that it will work, maybe not in drag race or towing applications but it will work.
     
  21. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Yep I agree, it will work. I was just saying that is a lot of investment in time and money for a sub-par setup. If it was the only transmission you could get and you wanted to baby it, I'm sure it would work. But I would think his transmission would be an easy sell to the flathead guys and he could get a world-cl*** mustang transmission with better gears and a lot stronger for less than he could sell the S10 for. Then it is a more standard install, stronger, better gearing, etc.
     
  22. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    I wouldn't run an S10 behind a flathead! But that is just preference on my part. I use the T5Zs as much as possible, it is just a lot better transmission all the way around, the next in line for me would be a 89-93 mustang T5. Which T5 are you using Mark?
     
  23. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    I agree 100%, the Mustang box is what I chose for my project. (early 90's 5.0)

    He will still need to use an S10 tailhousing if he is going to use the stock bench seat in his truck.
     
  24. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    Now that's a transmission! What did you install it in? Yes and no on the S10 tailhousing, that is probably the best way to go, but my current project is putting a T5Z in a 33 5 window coupe. I have S10 tailhousing, but think I am going to go with a remote shift setup.
     
  25. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    I'm installing it in my '29 Roadster behind a Y-Block, I also have the S10 Tailhousing sitting on the shelf waiting to be installed.

    With a positive stop shifter and a few internal mods it will hold up fine for what I'm doing.
     
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2014
  26. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    LOL, I'm thinking about something like this, except on the ford tailhousing.
     

    Attached Files:

  27. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

    I posted a few pictures of shifters like that on one of the T5 threads.
     
  28. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

  29. Mark T
    Joined: Feb 19, 2007
    Posts: 2,175

    Mark T
    Member

  30. jseery
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 743

    jseery
    Member
    from Wichita KS

    yep, looks like my collection. I think I really like that approach.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.