Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Opinion Needed

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by ct1932ford, Aug 29, 2014.

  1. thommoina33
    Joined: Jun 27, 2008
    Posts: 1,051

    thommoina33
    Alliance Member
    from australia

    Full hood, the lines flow from front to rear, beautiful !!


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  2. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    They want their '32s to look like hot rods.
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  3. greybeard360
    Joined: Feb 28, 2008
    Posts: 2,098

    greybeard360
    Member

    I vote......... yes

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  4. BORRACHO13
    Joined: Feb 6, 2008
    Posts: 1,097

    BORRACHO13
    Member
    from Menifee CA

    no hood, show off the mill! :cool:
     
  5. firerod
    Joined: Jan 20, 2008
    Posts: 572

    firerod
    Member
    from Colorado

    You have a great looking engine, no hood!
     
  6. ct1932ford
    Joined: Dec 3, 2010
    Posts: 13,262

    ct1932ford
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I built it to be a Hot Rod.:cool: I think the hood stays off!:) Sorry bobwop.:rolleyes: Thanks everyone. Spring! 005.JPG
     
  7. 3wLarry
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 12,804

    3wLarry
    Member Emeritus
    from Owasso, Ok

    Find a nice pair of Guide 903J headlights and mount them up and do another before and after. :)
     
  8. ct1932ford
    Joined: Dec 3, 2010
    Posts: 13,262

    ct1932ford
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Maybe someone can Photoshop it?
     
  9. HJmaniac
    Joined: Jun 11, 2006
    Posts: 5,389

    HJmaniac
    Member

    [​IMG]

    I like the split decision look!:confused:
     
    Hotrodmyk likes this.
  10. ct1932ford
    Joined: Dec 3, 2010
    Posts: 13,262

    ct1932ford
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    One in every crowd!:rolleyes:
     
  11. BURN OUT BOB
    Joined: Apr 16, 2005
    Posts: 1,859

    BURN OUT BOB
    Member Emeritus
    from western AZ

    I like the hood top or full hood.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. tb33anda3rd
    Joined: Oct 8, 2010
    Posts: 17,583

    tb33anda3rd
    Member

  13. jimcolwell
    Joined: Oct 4, 2009
    Posts: 474

    jimcolwell
    Member
    from Amarillo

    Leave that hood off and detail that engine. Don't add any weight. Big Daddy says it's nothing but horse power and weight.
     
  14. Muttley
    Joined: Nov 30, 2003
    Posts: 18,501

    Muttley
    Member

    No hood.............also remove front plate, horn, top and trim rings, relocate rear plate.
     
  15. cuzncletus
    Joined: Dec 1, 2006
    Posts: 86

    cuzncletus
    Member

    On this car, hood off. The reason is the color. I like the beige, but with the hood on it looks like a resto with it's fenders off. If the car had a color with more eye pop I'd likely prefer the hood on.
     
  16. 26hotrod
    Joined: Nov 28, 2009
    Posts: 1,141

    26hotrod
    Member
    from landis n c

    NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOD. Not that many flatheads and yours seems to be well detailed..............................
     
  17. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,763

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If you add a hood you might as well add the fenders and bumpers too!

    Personally,I think it's a cool roadster as is,but I think the top looks kinda out of place. HRP
     
  18. Omarsvette
    Joined: Dec 7, 2013
    Posts: 612

    Omarsvette
    Member
    from Arizona

    no hood brotha. its a hot rod. hot rods have at***ude and grit, especially your year.
     
  19. lothiandon1940
    Joined: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 32,418

    lothiandon1940
    Member

    Personally I like it ****oned up with a full hood, but it surely is a shame to hide that luscious Flathead underneath. With the hood on it's kind of a tease, like a mystery, people see it and think, "What's hiding under that hood?" It's sort of like seeing a great looking lady in a pair of black *******. She looks so damn good as is, but you just know there's a treasure to be found when you remove them.;)
     
    volvobrynk, bobwop and HOTRODPRIMER like this.
  20. waxhead
    Joined: May 11, 2013
    Posts: 1,172

    waxhead
    Member
    from West Oz

    Full hood
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  21. maplefrm
    Joined: Aug 15, 2010
    Posts: 696

    maplefrm
    Member
    from Central IL

    I would put a full hood on it and remove the folding top, it looks big and bulky laying up there and takes away the sleekness of the '32 body.
     
  22. bobwop
    Joined: Jan 13, 2008
    Posts: 6,135

    bobwop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Arley, AL

    oh well, there was hope
    love your car, no matter what
     
    volvobrynk and lothiandon1940 like this.
  23. Runnin shine
    Joined: Apr 12, 2013
    Posts: 3,383

    Runnin shine
    Member

    Although I love your roadster and the beige paint it doesn't look like a "hot rod" with the hood on. I agree that hood and sides are beautiful but this seems to work at a disadvantage for you and just makes your 32 look too cl***y for a rod. Maybe if you took off the trim rings, lights, top, windshield, and painted numbers on the doors it would work as a lakes car. Funny, take off to put on.


    "Listen Mr... It ain't broke if I can't fix it"
     
  24. gwhite
    Joined: Sep 1, 2007
    Posts: 3,136

    gwhite
    SUPER MODERATOR

    I agree. The hood makes the car look finished.

    As for hoods at the lakes - they were required by the SCTA rules to wit;
    "All cars must be equipped with metal engine hoods extending from the firewall to a radiator shell and across the top to the beginning of the vertical hood sides. Vertical hood side panels may be omitted. All hoods must be securely fastened in place." - SCTA Technical Regulation 6 - 1947.
     
    volvobrynk and gimpyshotrods like this.
  25. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 22,847

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    How bout this... Hood, no hood sides, leather hood straps... Lose the rag top... Paint the wheels black.

    Easy change up that would give the car a completely different personality.


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  26. joeycarpunk
    Joined: Jun 21, 2004
    Posts: 4,446

    joeycarpunk
    Member
    from MN,USA

    I don't mind the idea of a top living in MN but a ****pit cover provides minor protection and looks sleeker. I agree with Ryan about the wires, I love 'em but they tend to look too pretty. Had them on my car for about 15 minutes and ditched that idea.
     
  27. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    Hood for sure, sides optional, 7" King Bees or Arrows...
     
    Last edited: Aug 30, 2014
    volvobrynk likes this.
  28. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,522

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Smaller headlights. No hood. Hood top only when rain is in the forecast.

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  29. That car looks good either way! But I'm partial to the hoodless look.

    We drive our 32 quite a bit - sometimes our daily driver - in most weather. I added a hood top with no sides to ours. We can run down the highway in the rain with no problems. Water coming over the windshield, under the windshield and over the doors but that flathead just keeps on going...
     
  30. ronnieroadster
    Joined: Sep 9, 2004
    Posts: 1,185

    ronnieroadster
    Member

    My head is spinning :confused: from all the different ideas Mark look what you started oh boy. :eek:
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.