Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Big Bertha is Getting a Shave

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Slammer, Feb 1, 2015.

?
  1. Portholes

    14 vote(s)
    66.7%
  2. No Portholes

    7 vote(s)
    33.3%
  1. Slammer
    Joined: May 18, 2009
    Posts: 9

    Slammer
    Member

    My '64 Buick Electra 225 Sport Coupe is getting a shave. I have been debating the portholes for months. Portholes or no portholes?
    BerthaComparo.jpg
     
  2. KoolKat-57
    Joined: Feb 22, 2010
    Posts: 3,092

    KoolKat-57
    Member
    from Dublin, OH

    Would it still be a Buick without the port holes?
    KK
     
    tb33anda3rd likes this.
  3. My thoughts, exactly. Maybe replace them with another year Buick porthole trim?
     
  4. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,663

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    Or put 'rm ahead of the rear tire under the trim.
     
    kiwijeff and Slammer like this.
  5. Slammer
    Joined: May 18, 2009
    Posts: 9

    Slammer
    Member

    Yeah guys, that is one side of the argument. But I also like the clean lines sans the portholes.

    I have already placed a bullet in the grill emblem hole and removed all Buick & Electra and 225 badges so the portholes are all that is left to give away it's make to the masses. Even with them there I get the "Love your Cadillac!" comments almost as often as I get the "What is it?" comments.

    It is still on the BIG Buick X frame, with a Nailhead and clean Buick lines, so it's a Buick, regardless.

    Thanks for the input. Still thinkin' thinkin'.
     
  6. Stu D Baker
    Joined: Mar 4, 2005
    Posts: 2,813

    Stu D Baker
    Member
    from Illinois

    No port holes makes it look kind of like a Chevrolet..
     
  7. 0NE BAD 51 MERC
    Joined: Nov 12, 2010
    Posts: 1,809

    0NE BAD 51 MERC
    Member

    It has been said that anyone can restore a old car , But it takes a real man to cut one up! Either way it a great car!! Larry
     
    Slammer likes this.
  8. Slammer
    Joined: May 18, 2009
    Posts: 9

    Slammer
    Member

    I guess, if you squint really, really hard. But the Buick is a bigger, smoother car. 64-64.jpg
     
  9. I vote no port holes.
    Cleans it up, and will keep some guessing.
     
  10. Buddy Palumbo
    Joined: Mar 30, 2008
    Posts: 3,871

    Buddy Palumbo
    Member

    I vote NO portholes as well ... very sleek-looking . I love it !
     
  11. Slammer
    Joined: May 18, 2009
    Posts: 9

    Slammer
    Member

    The current 5 - 4 vote pretty well mirrors my thinking. No closer to a decision...
     
  12. blowby
    Joined: Dec 27, 2012
    Posts: 8,663

    blowby
    Member
    from Nicasio Ca

    Cut the studs off, glue a magnetic patch on and put 'em where you want, when you want.
     
  13. Portholes please
     
  14. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 10,950

    BJR
    Member

    Use 54 ventiports, 4 to a side.
     
  15. MAD 034
    Joined: Aug 30, 2011
    Posts: 775

    MAD 034
    Member
    from Washington

    Portholes should stay. The car looks pretty darn clean with them left in place unlike script and such.
     
  16. 69fury
    Joined: Feb 24, 2009
    Posts: 1,679

    69fury
    Member

    You'll get so many more "nice Caddy!" comments without them. Move them, swap for other years if you want, but i vote No to removing them completely. -rick.
     
  17. BigDogSS
    Joined: Jan 8, 2009
    Posts: 982

    BigDogSS
    Member
    from SoCal

    Keep the port holes. CHROME and more of it is what makes old cars bitchen'!
     
  18. Squablow
    Joined: Apr 26, 2005
    Posts: 18,163

    Squablow
    Member

    If it were me, I would shave the door handles and the rear quarter panel emblems, plus anything on the trunk lid, and I'd relocate the radio antenna to the rear quarter panels, maybe one on each side, heavily angled either way. But I'd keep the port holes and the emblem in the grille.

    The portholes and grille emblem don't distract from the car but they do give it identity, unlike the door handles and front fender antenna, which just distract from the lines of the car, in my opinion. Stuff like that only gets put on the car for practicality, not for design.
     
  19. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,827

    Paul
    Editor

    Lose the port holes,
    people will stop saying "nice Cadillac"
    and start saying "nice Lincoln"
     
  20. pressuredrop
    Joined: Feb 12, 2009
    Posts: 60

    pressuredrop
    Member
    from mesa AZ

  21. Slammer
    Joined: May 18, 2009
    Posts: 9

    Slammer
    Member

    Round ports on a boxy car?
     
  22. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,392

    indyjps
    Member

    Reposition the portholes higher on the fender and use 6 or 8 per side instead of 4, that will make people wonder.
     
  23. ROBERT JAM
    Joined: Nov 13, 2002
    Posts: 1,274

    ROBERT JAM
    Member

    Portholes only 50s style ones.the oval type
     
  24. Slammer
    Joined: May 18, 2009
    Posts: 9

    Slammer
    Member

    Though I appreciate and see the merits of the older style portals, the re-positioning options, and adding portals, that is really not me. I want smooth, clean lines. I will not be adding any distractions to the body lines. I have seen too many cars that end up looking kinda clowny, meaning that a detail like this distracts from the car instead of adding to it.

    My thought is, "Do the portholes add to the aesthetics of the car or not?"
     
  25. mattyk007
    Joined: Sep 4, 2013
    Posts: 3

    mattyk007
    Member

    ImageUploadedByH.A.M.B.1423192978.663986.jpg

    Keep the port holes!


    Sent from my iPhone using H.A.M.B.
     
  26. mcmopar
    Joined: Nov 12, 2012
    Posts: 1,757

    mcmopar
    Member
    from Strum, wi

    The port hole are the only thing that would ever make me want a Buick, keep them.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.