Register now to get rid of these ads!

Features 1950's period correct hot rods.

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by oldebob, Dec 27, 2009.

  1. I think the gray parts are rubber floor mats attached to the carpet.

    I though the dash was alum., however the book East vs West Showdown Rods, Customs and Rails.
    it is a galvanized steel.
     
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2015
    tb33anda3rd likes this.
  2. More from the Saratoga Auto Museum-

    GEDC0919.JPG GEDC0920.JPG GEDC0922.JPG
     
  3. birdog
    Joined: Nov 25, 2010
    Posts: 431

    birdog
    Member
    from Monroe, UT

    Lol so funny
     
  4. LOL I was considering doing that with my A build but didn't want to move the cross member and had a proper main leaf ( by accident) to run my '38 axle spring over. If I had the right spring I would move my cross member just for grins. it is a neat setup.
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  5. i am a chevy guy so bear with me, what is the argument against spring ahead? is it a looks thing? or safety?
    to me it still is going the wrong way and is only half of what should be there.:p:cool:
     
    Bowtie Coupe and volvobrynk like this.
  6. The argument has to do with not being done properly as a rule. Lots of old cars they just used the later axle and spring for the brakes, juice brakes are better. Well if you don't move the cross member forward when you go spring in front you move the axle back, so you loose wheel base and you look wonky.

    if you look at old picture albums and old survivor rods you see a lot of them with the axle moved back when they went with a spring in front setup. Done correctly with the cross member moved and everything cleaned up it is a sharp setup or some of us think so. It is also an easy way to drop one. I like the look of the spring in front, some people don't but what do they know. :D
     
    brad2v, volvobrynk and tb33anda3rd like this.
  7. Sure there was [a period correct]...unless, of course, you believe somebody in 1956 figured out how to overcome the whole space/time continuum. Fact is, a lot of folks' definition of period correct is skewed. It means nothing more than 'correct for the time period'. Would a 40's part be correct for a 50's hot rod? Sure would. A 30's part? Probably so (generally speaking). A 20's part? Maybe. A 60's, 70's, 80's part? T-5? Vega steering box? Find me a single 1950's magazine that shows hot rods (or customs for the sake of 'diversity') with those later parts and I'll give you $1,000.

    Period correct means true to the period - and not just 'skin deep' it also represents the individual parts, pieces, styles, and construction methods that, together, make up a hot rod and 'set' it in an historical context. And yes, I'll kick a keyboard's ass if my message board gets littered up with modern crap :)

    But enough about all that... This thread is about actual era-built or true to the time hot rods...we can discuss definitions elsewhere if we need to... Let's keep this focused.
     
  8. Modern crap:

    [​IMG]
    Sorry Mr White I absolutely could not help myself. :confused:o_O:D

    I don't spend a lot of time reading old magazines, but I can recall the men who visited the Ol' Man's shop saying things like that is how they used to do it as early as say '58 or 9? Maybe '60 or '61. So as far as period correctness goes that would have been an old school form of period correctness. Wouldn't it?

    I think that period correct is more then a suggested guideline. If I am building an early '60s style car it is pretty cut and dried as to how it was done and what was used to do it. We may for instance argue as to whether Ansen Sprints were being cast and used in '64 for example but it is pretty cut and dried that no one was using Center Line Wheels Billet Series Scorpion Polished Wheels. So if I were to say, "This is my '60s style car" and it had Centerline Scorpions on it a serious keyboard bashing should ensue.
     
    patmanta, Sancho and gwhite like this.
  9. volvobrynk
    Joined: Jan 30, 2011
    Posts: 3,587

    volvobrynk
    Member
    from Denmark

    I like this one a lot! Looks so good, and got me all hot and bartered about Traditional hot rod's, and mostly about era perfekt rods.
    If I ever wins the big one in lotto I Wil buy this one!
     

    Attached Files:

    Sancho, AndersF and Squablow like this.
  10. Hay P-n-B ; How does this work for ya? P1010242.JPG P1010245.JPG
     
  11. Well I think I'm in love.

    Hey someone give me a spring, I got late model yolks. I'll do a tech on how to do it on your A and still have the fender option. ;)

    That is sweet :cool:
     
  12. Hmmm,, Fender option? You mean like this? P1010212.JPG P1010214.JPG
     
  13. F&J
    Joined: Apr 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,238

    F&J
    Member

    That would be slick if you can pull it off. I'm not suggesting tons of new builds should have that, but you would be showing some of the great diversity of that era. ...and, so few would dare try it today.

    .
     
    falcongeorge and brad2v like this.
  14. Yea did you move the X member or are you going to move the fenders. it looks like the axle is in the right place is why I ask.
     
  15. Channeled and Full fendered with late axles front and rear was the plan all along. Also part of the plan was nothing newer than 53, all factory Henry hard parts and no hand carved pieces. So far I'm getting there. No I didn't move the cross member forward on the frame rails and Yes the wheel base is stock to a Model A.
    The Wizzard
     
    falcongeorge likes this.
  16. Six Ball
    Joined: Oct 8, 2007
    Posts: 6,440

    Six Ball
    Member
    from Nevada

    Got it.:rolleyes:
     
  17. Another real deal built in the 50's hot rod.

    This time a 33 three window, some updates made in the late 50's very early 60's-

    GEDC0495.JPG GEDC0496.JPG GEDC1703.JPG GEDC1704.JPG GEDC1702.JPG
     
  18. volvobrynk
    Joined: Jan 30, 2011
    Posts: 3,587

    volvobrynk
    Member
    from Denmark

    How about this one
     

    Attached Files:

    birdog, Sancho, brad2v and 3 others like this.
  19. Now that's some good stuff right there.
    The Wizzard
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  20. volvobrynk
    Joined: Jan 30, 2011
    Posts: 3,587

    volvobrynk
    Member
    from Denmark

    So you Dident like the first one? ☺
     
  21. Six Ball
    Joined: Oct 8, 2007
    Posts: 6,440

    Six Ball
    Member
    from Nevada

    I like that one. What are those seats, British? MG,Triumph? I have a very similar pair I'd like to use in my roadster. They are in a Studebaker Lark right now.
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  22. AndersF
    Joined: Feb 16, 2013
    Posts: 918

    AndersF
    Member

    This is problaby the first channeled hotrod in Sweden.
    I dont remember the exact buildyear at the moment but it is early 60:s.
    A link to some other early builds from sweden.
    http://www.kustomrama.com/index.php?title=Sweden
    Same car before channeling.
    [​IMG]
     
    Sancho, brad2v, F&J and 1 other person like this.
  23. volvobrynk
    Joined: Jan 30, 2011
    Posts: 3,587

    volvobrynk
    Member
    from Denmark

    Yes they are British. I find the magasin and check.


    I will check when I get home, but the rodding og this car started early, it was first a racecar and he borrowed the money from his grand mother, and started the first summer to remove fenders.
    Its pictured on kustomrama beside another channeled rod, both was very early channel job.
    It has a nice flathead with some Eddie Meyer parts, Evans parts and maybe an early Edelbrock intake.

    So nice
     
  24. Jake Sippl
    Joined: Nov 11, 2015
    Posts: 276

    Jake Sippl
    Member
    from Detroit MI

    this is an awesome thread by the way!
     
  25. dumprat
    Joined: Dec 27, 2006
    Posts: 3,521

    dumprat
    Member
    from b.c.

    The small block Ford gives it a 60's vibe. I would change out the headers but it is a very nice anyway.
     
    Runnin shine likes this.
  26. Jake Sippl
    Joined: Nov 11, 2015
    Posts: 276

    Jake Sippl
    Member
    from Detroit MI

    that's hilarious that you say that.. that's the first thing I'm going to change on it.. I'm thinking lake pipes, with cut outs hidden and letting out underneath the body. there's just something about lake pipes haha
     
    volvobrynk likes this.
  27. Jake Sippl
    Joined: Nov 11, 2015
    Posts: 276

    Jake Sippl
    Member
    from Detroit MI

  28. Sorry but from what I remember that car Screams 1975 to current. It's still OK with me.
    The Wizzard
     
  29. Maybe you should go find some 50's 60's magazines. I think your a bit confused.
    The Wizard
     
  30. Jake Sippl
    Joined: Nov 11, 2015
    Posts: 276

    Jake Sippl
    Member
    from Detroit MI

    you're right on that one.. I'd say it does look more 70's-current now that I look at it more carefully.. That's like my favorite era though.. especially 60's style
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.