Register now to get rid of these ads!

Event Coverage Who won the roadster show???

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by GMC BUBBA, Jan 29, 2017.

  1. That's a fair statement.

    In haste, I made assumptions about the owner that, as evidenced by your comments, is not true. I'm glad to hear it will get driven!
     
    cretin likes this.
  2. I agree and believe it begins with an attitude to achieve the best result possible.
    The bar is raised every time someone refuses to settle for 'good enough' and demands 'the best that can be' in all aspects of the build.
    I see these great automotive works as an inspiration of what we can achieve when we apply ourselves with a similar attitude.
     
    cretin likes this.
  3. I kind of thought it was a good discussion. There was a little division but not much and some facts and misconceptions got straightened out.
    To you guys that had a hand in any of the AMBR contender builds; Damn, you quickened my pulse, put a big ass smile on my face, and demonstrated what can be done with skills, desire, and an eye for beauty. Hell yeah.
     
    Stogy likes this.
  4. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

  5. Nostrebor
    Joined: Jun 25, 2014
    Posts: 1,324

    Nostrebor
    Member

    I was not at the show and did not see the competitors, but the winning car is absolutely stunning. Congratulations to the winner and the builders on a job well executed!
     
    cretin likes this.
  6. When I lived I California, I went to may car shows. A lot of times, the Barris cars were over the top design-wise, but I really appreciated the quality of the build. The Packard seems to be in the same vein, you may question the overall design, but not the quality of the build.
     
  7. quickchangeV8
    Joined: Dec 7, 2010
    Posts: 585

    quickchangeV8
    Member

    Is the Packard that won the GNRS originally a roadster or a convertible? I believe that Packard in 1936 offered a convertible, which means that it had roll up windows. Cars with roll up windows are considered convertibles and are not roadsters. I thought the AMBR award was for roadsters only. How was this Packard allowed to compete for the AMBR award if it was originally a convertible?
     
  8. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,659

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    I don't think it matters what it once was. I'm pretty sure cars that used to be coupes or sedans have competed as well as cars that used to be a pile of flat sheet metal.
     
    Jimmy B likes this.
  9. From what I have been told by a Packard Expert, Packard stopped building windowless roadsters in 1931 with the exception being The LeBaron Speedster that was a side curtain car in 34. So this car started out as a Convertible technically (Although I'm pretty sure Troy's crew made the doors from scratch anyway)
     
  10. Two words...Bruce Jenner.
     
    clunker likes this.
  11. 32n343windows
    Joined: Jun 21, 2016
    Posts: 27

    32n343windows

    Beautiful car...but that steering column is.." Unfortunate"
     
  12. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    jcmarz likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.