Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods 283 bored .060

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Aaron Lankford, Jan 26, 2017.

  1. 55chevr
    Joined: Jul 12, 2008
    Posts: 985

    55chevr
    Member

    Olds 305 rings work if the ring thickness for the top ring matches. I have a block bored .060 over - 12 to 1 pistons ... top ring requires .043 ... no rings - nowhere. Only option is to machine groove bigger and then the land to the second ring will be thin.

    Joe
     
  2. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

  3. 202 intake heads will work on a 283. But they will not enhance performance. The cylinder wall shrouds them . 194,s will make as much power in a small bore small displacement engine.
     
    olscrounger likes this.
  4. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    IMG_2294.JPG
     

    Attached Files:

  5. 29moonshine
    Joined: Dec 30, 2006
    Posts: 1,356

    29moonshine
    Member

    my casting book reads 58-61 corvette or 58-62 p***enger car or truck
     
    Aaron Lankford likes this.
  6. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    Yes! The better of the 283 blocks! Heavier cast. VIN code as my pics show, is FII07EB had some feedback and some misinformation on the web about that. Thing is motor has no serial code stamped near the VIN code. Either way, it's a Flint block with a corvette casting # could have been set aside as a factory replacement motor, too..
    a 283 .060 over (292) with domed pistons, matched with the right head/ cam combo, should make a good running motor. Keep compression up I think is the main thing. I'm liking a set of 461 casting double humps I found online. Valve size not a problem and low cc might work well.
     
  7. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    Has a date code of K20
     
  8. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,975

    Roothawg
    Member

    I believe the casting number for the good 305 heads is a 416 or 601, if memory serves.
     
    Deuces, Speed Gems and Aaron Lankford like this.
  9. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    Those are what I've researched. Head selection may depend if this motor has a 283 or 327 crankshaft???
     
  10. Montana1
    Joined: Jan 1, 2015
    Posts: 2,140

    Montana1
    Member

    Have you measured the stroke? It's easy without the heads on. You could even do it with a tape measure. ;) Let us know...
     
  11. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    I thought about that ;) good idea
     
    Montana1 likes this.
  12. Torkwrench
    Joined: Jan 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,751

    Torkwrench
    Member

    Is the oil pan pulled off? If so, look inside the crankcase at the bottom of the cylinder bores. In 1961 and older 283's the crankcase casting was flat across the bottom of the cylinders. If the block is 1962 or newer, it will be dished.

    This was changed when the 327's came out. 327 crankshafts have bigger counterweights and need the extra room for clearance. A 327 crank will not fit in a 1961 or older 283 block unless the counter weights are turned down.
     
  13. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

     
  14. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    No haven't had a chance to pull the pan yet. Hopefully this week! Sold a truck so there's an open bay at "the shop"
    I appreciate the information. It will be helpful figuring this little motor out! Thanks again, I'll post about the engine as things unfold. Never know, someday when this an old thread, it might help another.
     
    mod700rmk likes this.
  15. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    Ok anyone, thoughts... just purchased heads.
    "461" casting 1965 date code. 1.94/1.50 valves
    Bronze guides, umbrella stem seals, slight porting, dual spring good for 500 lift cam, etc... blah blah blah! Lol
    Now, deciding on rocker ratios
    Thoughts???
     
    markl350 and Asphalt Angel like this.
  16. Torkwrench
    Joined: Jan 28, 2005
    Posts: 2,751

    Torkwrench
    Member

    Sounds like a good set of heads for it. As far as rockers....Do you have any idea of what valve covers you want to use?

    When using traditional valve covers such as finned Cal Customs, or finned Corvette valve covers, rocker arm clearance can be an issue. I have a set of Cal Customs on my 283 and went with stock ratio roller tip rockers. Full roller rockers wouldn't clear.


    scan0010.jpg
     
    Aaron Lankford likes this.
  17. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    Nice looking setup! Is your motor bored out at all? Curious about your carb and cam setup, too?? Got any idea what compression your running?
     
  18. Nice....brings back memories of my first hot rod motor with my dad.....
    283
    .060 over
    11.5-1 compression
    194 heads
    Steel crank.....bottom end balanced.
    Sig Erson cam.....477 lift/316 duration
    Edelbrock intake and Holley 650 DP
    ......we had it decked......when we put putty in the cyl heads to check clearance we found that piston dome would barely strike spark plugs.....went with a short plug and thick head gasket and crossed our fingers.
    Cam tried to **** out rocker studs....could not afford screw in studs, so we plugged all holes in the heads with rags and got moms vacuum.....kept vacuum nozzle right on the drill bit...drilled and pinned the studs right on the car.
    You could turn the RPM's up to 7000 all day.
    55 chevy with a M22 and olds rear end that was welded up.
    It ran like a beast....wish I still had it !!!!
    Thanks for bringing back that memory !!!
     
  19. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,440

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon


    Hell, I even enjoyed your memory.
    Small blocks rule!
     
    Aaron Lankford likes this.
  20. Chamber cc ?
     
  21. Hot Rods Ta Hell
    Joined: Apr 20, 2008
    Posts: 4,775

    Hot Rods Ta Hell
    Member

    283's are great engines and pull hard if set up right! The 1.94 461's heads are a great match.
    Once you drop the pan, see if it has a cast or forged crack. The width of the casting seam will tell you real quick which crank is in it. Look on line for a photo.
     
    Aaron Lankford likes this.
  22. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    62cc
     
  23. Aaron Lankford
    Joined: Jan 26, 2017
    Posts: 38

    Aaron Lankford

    Thanks for sharing your old setup! That's close to what I have, just tinkering with ideas as far as cam and which intake to use. The block is a 60' Flint block. Heads are 65's Muncie is a 65', I have a long way to go with the car before the motor becomes real critical. Kinda building it along the way! Again, thanks for shoring your old build! If you recall that intake, let me know
     
  24. Okay ,great .
    BTW, did you pour them, or taking someone else's word?
    Now, you're gonna have to pour the domes so you can figure out actual compression..(also deck check ,and gasket planned.
    11.5 might sound great at the cruise night, but not so good , real world.
    Also DP carbs came out,..when?
     
  25. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    I'm an 'old timer', have stuff going, but am 'throwing together' a nice lo-mileage 283 with Grant rings, powr-pak heads, old General Kinetics cam, have various intakes. But LOVE your 2X2 home brewed intake!
    Mind telling me if it's a fresh casting, or modified? (if modified, from what?)
    I have the same rocker covers, in case I want to use 'fuelie rockers'...or large rollers.
    I found some nice stainless headers on line...this engine can go into any of my street legal T's. Just an engine that fits everything. Just in case.
     
    6-bangertim likes this.
  26. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,440

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    An original intake and AFB carb off the old 300 horse 327 would work pretty good on a mildly built 283, not the cheapest route though due to the restoration crowd and that well known auction site. Also would satisfy any "period correct" sensibilities too.
     
  27. Even at that once you bore it and change the camshaft it is no longer a corvette motor. :D

    I took a '59 283 ( complete motor) back around '03 or '04 and punched it .060. It would have cleaned up @ .030 but some idiot got too heavy handed with the ridge reamer. Ran a set of rebuilt power pack heads, and eddy performer and a 500 CFM cars, a Lunatti RV cam (LOL yea what actually is an RV cam). set it up @ 9.0:1. Had a very mild lope, ran well and pulled hard.

    There is no way to guess where the now deceased original builder was headed with the OPs motor. I can say this that .060 over 283s were popular when I was a younger man. +.125 was cool to the bone but +,060 was more common and they seemed to run real well. I have seen a lot of good blocks punched .060 over the years,it was just a popular
     
    Aaron Lankford likes this.
  28. This was in 1984.....or so.......right before I moved off to college.
     
  29. IMG_5277.JPG IMG_5276.JPG Hope you don't mind an old pic.......dont want to hijack the thread.
    lived out in the country...notice the bailing wire holding the radiator in place.....Damn I wish I had another 55 post with a 283 !!!
     
    Aaron Lankford likes this.
  30. When trolling for compliments and bragging rights..... tell your friends you're running a hot Biscayne 283.
    Always leaves them speechless.


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    Dogger likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.