Register now to get rid of these ads!

Customs 1953 chevy rear window rubber

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by banditomerc, Feb 14, 2018.

  1. banditomerc
    Joined: Dec 18, 2005
    Posts: 2,515

    banditomerc
    Member

    Okay,been working on this 53 chevy bel air 210 coupe for the last 5 years..it's a full custom..anyway,I'm at the gl*** cutting stage and decided not to run the stainless trim on the front and rear windows..so I went and bought the front rubber for a 150 model since that particular has no stainless..but the 150 rear gl*** is different..so,my question is can I run a new rubber for 210 model with the access for stainless without any issues or must I use the stainless to keep the rear gl*** tight...hope I'm clear
    .
     

    Attached Files:

  2. RMONTY
    Joined: Jan 7, 2016
    Posts: 2,662

    RMONTY
    Member

    Looks like you got some grindin' and metal finishing to do before putting gl*** in! :eek:
     
  3. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,036

    belair
    Member

    How is the gl*** different? 150 or 210 should be the same. Coupe and sedan are probably different.
     
    Johnny Gee likes this.
  4. 302GMC
    Joined: Dec 15, 2005
    Posts: 8,481

    302GMC
    Member
    from Idaho

    Use '54 150 rubber. And there's no such thing as a Bel Air 210 ....
     
  5. J53
    Joined: Aug 8, 2005
    Posts: 238

    J53
    Member
    from WI

    In '54 yes, in '53 the 150 gl*** is different


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  6. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,365

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    Explain further please as I like knowing little details like this.
     
  7. J53
    Joined: Aug 8, 2005
    Posts: 238

    J53
    Member
    from WI

    In '53 there was three different rear windows, only two in '54;

    The 1953 150 models had the small one similar (but definately not the same) to '52. The Club Coupes had stainless trim, all others did not. This window was not used in 1954.
    064.jpg

    The 210 & Belair models had the big wrap around rear window, all had stainless. This window was also used on all 150 (no stainless), 210, and Belair models in 1954.
    low54.jpg

    Then there is the Hardtop. This window was used in '53 and '54 as well and all had stainless.
    img2482y.jpg

    Also, some people don't realize that the hardtop and convert windshields were different from the sedans/coupes. Same shape just 5/8" or 3/4" shorter.

    All three pics probably found their way into my computer via the HAMB, someday I'll be proud enough of my own '53 150 to post a pic of it...

    Jay
     
    Last edited: Feb 14, 2018
  8. J53
    Joined: Aug 8, 2005
    Posts: 238

    J53
    Member
    from WI

    Wait- 302GMC is right. The '54 150 window gasket might not have the groove for the stainless trim. Steele Rubber's website also says it doesn't.

    Jay
     
  9. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,365

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    How I never noticed this is a big Oh Wow moment. What about the 1/4 gl***? I totally brain farted, 54 didn't have a small 1/4 either?
     
  10. 325w
    Joined: Feb 18, 2008
    Posts: 6,499

    325w
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    150 rubber is different than Belair/210 rubber. But the gl*** fits the 150 also. The corner stainless covers the difference in the sheet metal. As long as we are talking sedans. Four door rear gl*** fits a Tudor sedan.
     
  11. banditomerc
    Joined: Dec 18, 2005
    Posts: 2,515

    banditomerc
    Member

    The car in question is painted already,I didn't have a current pic when I posted. But this picture shows the stainless trim I don't want,so....is there a rubber available minus the provision for stainless trim?if not,can I use the rubber in picture minus the trim and not have issues with gl*** sealing?
     

    Attached Files:

  12. Kurt
    Joined: Nov 18, 2003
    Posts: 698

    Kurt
    Member

    Yes, they make a rubber with or without trim groove
    .
     
  13. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,036

    belair
    Member

    Is this a coupe or sedan? Not to disagree with @J53-thanks for the pics- BUT- are we talking about the differences between a coupe and a sedan roof/back gl***, or 150 and 210 roof/back gl***? Were there 210 and Bel Air 53 coupes, or only 150 coupes? If there were 210/BA coupes (53 was the last year for that body style, IIR), then did they have different roofs/rear windows? @J53 - is the black 53 with the different rear window a coupe (looks like it to me), or a sedan? While it may be moot, and I may be beating a dead horse, I think we are talking about the differences between body styles, coupe/sedan, rather than trim levels, BA, 210, and 150. I'll shut up now.
     
    Johnny Gee likes this.
  14. J53
    Joined: Aug 8, 2005
    Posts: 238

    J53
    Member
    from WI

    Black car is a coupe (Longer trunk lid - we can get into that too if needed)

    1954;
    -Coupes and sedans, Belair or not all same rear gl***
    -hard tops different

    1953;
    -same as '54 except 150 models

    Both years 150 had no stainless

    There, clear as mud.




    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  15. belair
    Joined: Jul 10, 2006
    Posts: 9,036

    belair
    Member

  16. WZ JUNK
    Joined: Apr 20, 2001
    Posts: 1,913

    WZ JUNK
    Member
    from Neosho, MO

    My 54 2 door 210 originally had the stainless in the windshield and rear window gasket. I wanted to use the gasket without the stainless. The front windshield was not a problem but the rear window required some work. The gasket for the stainless has a 90 degree corner at the top but the gasket without the trim does not. The corner is round. I had to form a rounded corner and weld it into that area to change the shape in order to make the gasket work. I do not know why they made it that way and did not make the gasket with the 90 degree corner but without the groove for the stainless. As a side note the rubber gasket without the stainless trim groove is nearly twice the cost of the more complex gasket for the stainless trim.

    John
     
  17. WZ JUNK
    Joined: Apr 20, 2001
    Posts: 1,913

    WZ JUNK
    Member
    from Neosho, MO

    This is the corner that I modified to use the gasket without the stainless. IMG_6193.JPG
     
  18. J53
    Joined: Aug 8, 2005
    Posts: 238

    J53
    Member
    from WI

    Everyone just thinks it's the grille and the tail lights that separate the two but there are tons of little differences between '53 and '54 that a lot of people never realize. From the goofy rear window on the '53 150 down to the color of the turn signal indicators arrows on the dash, not to mention the mechanical changes under the hood. I think there was a thread on here years ago that listed many of them.


    Sent from my iPhone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    Imperials54 likes this.
  19. WZ JUNK
    Joined: Apr 20, 2001
    Posts: 1,913

    WZ JUNK
    Member
    from Neosho, MO

    What the corner looks like with the provision for the stainless trim. This is what mine looked like before I formed the metal and welded it in that area. IMG_6194.JPG
     
  20. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,365

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

    It is this that messed me up. Model over body style. Unrelated but near to this. Back gl*** gaskets 55 56 & 57. Now there's a cluster of minor stuff to remember in just the post models even when stainless is used on all three years.
     
  21. J53
    Joined: Aug 8, 2005
    Posts: 238

    J53
    Member
    from WI

    @belair....Just to clear up your last question... the '53 150 came in;
    2 door business coupe (no stainless rear window and long trunk lid)
    2 door club coupe (stainless and long trunk lid)
    2 door sedan (no stainless and short trunk lid)

    I don't remember if the 150 came in a 4 door in '53, have to look that up when I get to my owners manual.
     
  22. banditomerc
    Joined: Dec 18, 2005
    Posts: 2,515

    banditomerc
    Member

    This mod looks like factory...
     
  23. Imperials54
    Joined: Jan 30, 2018
    Posts: 17

    Imperials54

    The rubber from a 54 should work.
    The rubber
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.