Register now to get rid of these ads!

1952-59 Ford 53 Mercury engine swap

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by cwatson1953, Aug 21, 2018.

  1. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Ive searched & ive read the faq sticky but would like some more personal experience on a solid cruiser motor for my merc. It came to me with a SBC (350). Im a chevy guy but have nothing against ford & im not asking for the chevy vs ford debate.
    History:
    Motor ran ok when i got it & drove decent. I decided to tear down front end to rebuild & it all dominoed. Lol.
    Ended up with an oil pan full of choco milk that wreaked of fuel. The 350 is tired & needs a rebuild.
    Before i throw money at a sbc, what motors fit best with stock steering setup? I scored a hurst drop drag link that fits nice but it hangs a little low for my taste with my ride height.
    I honestly think ive over read the subject for which fords fit best & mods to fit a sbc. Not looking for a "500hp monster", just a good cruiser thats not a slow poke either. I know this is long winded & ill probably get the same responses ive been reading but you never know...

    Thanks!
     
  2. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Click on the "Sticky FAQ" at the top of the page,click on page 4 and scroll down to posts 97-99 you will see pictures of a 5.0 Ford install in a '53 Ford the 1952-53 Mercury uses the same mount kit http://www.butchscoolstuff.com/52-53-ford-car-15-sb-ford-engine-transmission-mount-kit-2501cpb/ Also notice the steering box clearance using the Hedman 88400 headers. You do not need a dropped tie rod with this swap using the later Fox Body 5.0 dual sump oil pan. I helped this guy all through the swap on a facebook forum if you use a C4 transmission no problems with clearance the AOD does require some minor mods to the floors tunnel. I helped a guy a while back on the main board here in a '53 Merc the same suggestions apply. I ***ume the radiator used with the Chevy has the lower hose on the p***enger side if you look at the pictures I linked you too you will notice this Ford has the early 1966-69 "short" water pump which also has a p***enger side lower hose so you can keep the radiator you have.
     
  3. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Ok cool. That was my main thing was wondering the differences between ford/merc. Also (me not being a ford guy) will that 5.0 motor move a heavy merc decent enough? I got into the idea of an FE motor but dont know much abt them so i decided to shoot for ease of install with least amount of butchering possible as a start point. Ill go check out the post you mentioned.
    Thanks for the input!

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  4. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    The 5.0 won't have any problem moving the Merc,the curb weight of your Merc is 3570 lbs compare that to a 2005 Mustang GT that weighs in a 3614 lbs. Also the 5.0 weighs about 100 lbs less than the '53 Merc flat head (free H.P.)
     
  5. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 26,031

    Roothawg
    Member

    I'm doing the 5.0 swap out of an Explorer/Mountaineer right now. Watch for my threads and it may save you some lumps. I'm sure I will take the majority of them....
     
    cwatson1953 likes this.
  6. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Will the dual sump bolt up to any 302 block?

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  7. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Also (while im bugging you with Qs)
    I know the 351 is a bit bigger than 302 but how does it fit against the drag link/steering? Thats really my main concern.
    Just curious. Ill go bigger motor if it doesnt cause too much more chaos with fitment.
    Thanks again.

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    JeffB2 likes this.
  8. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Thanks. I appreciate the heads up. Ill keep a look out for updates. What are you putting it in?

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  9. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 26,031

    Roothawg
    Member

    55 customline
     
    cwatson1953 likes this.
  10. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    cwatson1953 likes this.
  11. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Man, ive been researching like crazy lately. A lot of great info here btw! Thanks! I was looking into 351s & then got sidetracked & started looking at FEs....too many options. But from what ive gathered, if im looking for a good combo for lots of use & miles (daily) it sounds like the 302/c4 combo has the best bang per buck. I like the idea of the FEs but sounds like higher cost to build/parts not as easy to get/and they're quite heavy motors. That sound about right?

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  12. mammyjammer
    Joined: May 23, 2009
    Posts: 570

    mammyjammer
    Member
    from Area 51

    I am a FE guy and have decent inventory of parts and it still cost me a lot of money to build my latest FE.
    I would think fittment of an FE would be a lot more work as well.
    If I were starting from scratch, I would lean toward the 302 C4 combo....but the FE does look pretty cool under the hood!
     
    cwatson1953 likes this.
  13. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    "Lots of use & miles daily" Go with an AOD instead of the C4 if you will be running the highways the overdrive will gain about 3-4 MPG. Best AOD's were 1989-93 they had all the later upgrades and were non-computer, EPA average highway for a 1990 Crown Vic for example is 24 MPG and that is heavier than your Merc is.
     
    cwatson1953 likes this.
  14. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,752

    bobss396
    Member

    I run a stout SBC in my '59, take some flack for it but IDGAF about that. I really wanted a 351C for it, but had trouble locating a decent core locally. Plus I had most of the GM parts on hand already for the swap. The 4-speed option made it easier on my end over an automatic. I did swap a 351W and FMX into a '68 Mustang and ran into floor interference issues with the cast iron FMX case. I did toss a C4 into it, lots more room. For the '54 I'd agree that a 302 and AOD would be a good choice.
     
    cwatson1953 likes this.
  15. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Thanks. Ill look more into the AOD. i was leaning towards c4 because i gathered the AOD may require some trans tunnel cutting due to its size compared to c4. But ill check it out. Thanks again

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  16. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Yea. Ive got the sbc that came with the car and i had planned on running it but it seems the sbf will fit alot better with stock steering. I was going to spend the $ to rebuild it anyways...so i figure ill just find a good sbf & use that. Ive never been a "purist" when it come to mix & match motors to cars. Just whatever works. Thanks for the info.

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  17. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Yea. Thats what i was thinking. They do look great! Its real easy to get overly ambitious when dreaming up motors...lol

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  18. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    One of the guys I helped on facebook through his swap in a '53 posted pictures of his tunnel but he also used a B&M Hammer floor shift,is your Merc an automatic or stick now ? Here are some pictures #1 shows the AOD on the stock cross member, He cut the hole a little larger than needed he explained.
     
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2018
  19. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    AOD in a '53
     

    Attached Files:

  20. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Oh ok. Yea, doesnt look like you need to modify it very much. Mine was column shift auto. But i may swap out to an aftermakert column anyways so ill be able to decide then. Thanks for the pics & info!

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  21. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Your stock Merc column will work fine with a C4 or AOD with only a minor tweak. The car in the pictures was a stick at one time. You do need the Lokar TV cable for the AOD though.
     
  22. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Yea. This had a 350/350 when i picked it up. Had a lokar column shift kit on original column. The steering wheel spline & threads at top of column are badly chewed up (from POs). I found that out after i kept having to re-tighten the wheel nut. It would loosen up & the wheel would get wobbly.
    So ill either go aftermarket or replace the original inner shaft.

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    JeffB2 likes this.
  23. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,752

    bobss396
    Member

    I'm an old school hotrodder, we used what we had around the shop. The SBC installation was actually easier than doing a Ford swap. All of the Ford mounting points are intact, just made up a plate adapter for trans mount and motor mounts that bolt to the Ford crossmember pads. Like I said earlier in in the project, I had looked at a Boss 351 but bailed on it. It had spent years outside and was missing the main caps and almost everything else. I still have an eye peeled for a 351C and a top loader.
     
    cwatson1953 likes this.
  24. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Might be a good time to kill two birds with one stone,eliminate the "deadly spear" with a later column here's food for thought ;) http://fordfalcon2000.com/restoration/tiltcolumn.htm And maybe these options ? https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/power-steering-add-on.1019325/
     
  25. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

  26. Hot Rod Brando
    Joined: Apr 8, 2008
    Posts: 189

    Hot Rod Brando
    Member

    I did the SBF swap into my '53. It was pretty easy using the stuff I learned here and the Butch's mounts. Currently swapping out the toploader 4 spd for a race prepped C4 with a trans brake. I smoked the clutch out of it a week ago in SC and cracked an ear on the 4 spd so I'm done screwing around with it... If you have the shorter measurement 15 vs 17) I have a brand new set of Butch's mounts that I would let go since I ordered the wrong ones and painted the brackets... 53 Merc.jpg engine 53.jpg
     
  27. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

    Thanks for the info. Man, thats a good looking car! Too cool!
    Im not sure which mounts i need. Ill take the measurement tonight and let you know. Either way, i appreciate the offer! Thanks again.

    Sent from my SM-G935V using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
  28. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Here is the link to the measurements,note that the difference between the 15" & 17" also determines which oil pan you will use (see notes) http://www.butchscoolstuff.com/52-53-ford-car-15-sb-ford-engine-transmission-mount-kit-2501cpb/
     
    cwatson1953 likes this.
  29. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

  30. cwatson1953
    Joined: Nov 7, 2006
    Posts: 972

    cwatson1953
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.