Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Need to shift (finished) body on frame: 40 Ford

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 40 Flier, Jul 18, 2020.

  1. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

    I'm back at this after some family care (senior) problems... So plumbed every position, frame/axles spot on, body is off some amount, but as Darin pointed out above, how are the OEM boards aligned? And then there's the left fender opening is narrower than the right by 1/2"+. I'm downsizing the 265/60's and now I'm trying to figure out which leafs? I'm going to start a new thread after hours of searching I find very little info on spring lengths etc. I have a healthy respect for you guys that build these cars.
     
  2. ..............Why start a new thread? You're getting some worthwhile information with this one. Good luck going forward........Don.
     
    OLSKOOL57 likes this.
  3. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

    Need to lower the rear, with 24" tires the fender opening is 3" over the tire riding on 2" blocks. 80's S10/Blazer leafs, measured along the main leaf, front of axle is 27.5, rear is 24.5 eye to eye. Eye to eye installed is 52", so the springs are pretty much straight as installed. Standard sized shackles. Great ride, bad tire hop, my friends say the only option is to bag it. One guy says to take the 4th leaf out of the 5 leafs to reduce tension. So how did you guys get your cars down? Factoids: 100% factory steel/frame, 8" 3rd member axle.
     
  4. 32fenderless
    Joined: Jun 7, 2007
    Posts: 365

    32fenderless
    Member

    S10 had a factory lowered option. The rear had one leaf removed. To get mine down 2-2 1/2” I removed a leaf from the pack. It the the 3rd spring from the main.


    Sent from my iPhone using H.A.M.B.
     
    40 Flier likes this.
  5. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 21,372

    alchemy
    Member

    If the spring is already flat, and you have blocks in it, and you already have too-small rear tires (24" tires, seriously?), there is nothing more you could do to this setup without cutting. I think whoever mounted those springs probably built a front mount that hangs below the frame too much, and maybe the same for the rear shackles. Time for new mounts.

    Sometimes guys make mounts that fit in between the rails in front to get a lowered ride height. Can you do something like this? Do you have the fab skills?
     
    X38, olscrounger and lothiandon1940 like this.
  6. olscrounger
    Joined: Feb 23, 2008
    Posts: 4,803

    olscrounger
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    agree with alchemy--new springs and mounts and 27" rear tire 235/75/15.Weedetr has a nice setup
     
  7. Darin Younce
    Joined: May 8, 2019
    Posts: 589

    Darin Younce

    Are you saying your tires now are 24 " or when you down size because a 265 /60 tire in either 14 or 15 rims are respectively 27.50 and 26.50 tall.
     
  8. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

    I can't get anything past you guys, I fat fingered my phone, I've tried my (27") 205/60/15's from the front and they're a big improvement. The spring mounts are reasonably close to the frame, my fab skills wouldn't include fab'ing mounts above the frame. Yeah the flat springs... I talked to Eaton Spring in Detroit today and submitted a request for a quote. He said based upon dimensions there're not Blazer springs (?)
     
  9. Perfect combo for these cars.
    On my old one:
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Is there any way you could provide some actual pictures of the suspension and back half of the car? Words and numbers are one thing but clear pictures of the situation help a lot.
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  11. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

    Don't I wish, each time I try to post a pic from my laptop I get an error message saying it's a security issue, reload and try again which doesn't help. I've posted in the help area for a mod to tell me what I'm doing wrong.
     
  12. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

    Saints be praised! I had to reduce the size of my pics. Thank you mod! This is with the 255/60's with 2" lowering blocks. Next, thought I had a seal leak and found porosity at a welded over point which I suspect may have been traction bars in a previous set up, so I'm installing a spare 8" housing. You can see the punishment the tires has caused on the wheel well. 40 left wheel.jpg 40 spring.jpg
     
  13. olscrounger
    Joined: Feb 23, 2008
    Posts: 4,803

    olscrounger
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    60's will do that--looks to be about 1 " forward--what does the other side look like? You should go with a different spring and mt setup to center and get down a bit.
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  14. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

  15. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

  16. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

    OK, that's the right wheel in the center of the opening, other than tire rubs that's what I'm trying to get to.
     
  17. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 21,372

    alchemy
    Member

    Many spring kits run the upper eye of the shackles through a hole in the middle of the frame. That would gain you two inches. And as I said before, some also have the front spring mounts inboard of the frame rail, which would gain you four or more inches.

    I don't know why, but for some reason those springs look 55 Chevy-ish to me? Anybody else think so?

    Thirty-five years ago when my dad was putting together a 40 coupe, he tried a few different tire and wheel combos. It sat down really nice, and I think the wheels ended being 15x7", and the tires were probably 235/75 15's. They were in the sweet spot of the opening up-down, and even fit good side to side. But we could still get them to scream on turns when the wheelwell contacted the sidewall a bit. You've just got to live with it on a 40 unless you use some front tires on the rear.
     
    olscrounger likes this.
  18. Darin Younce
    Joined: May 8, 2019
    Posts: 589

    Darin Younce

     
  19. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

  20. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

    Kinda hard to see but the front mount is at the juncture of the frame and the X member, possibly the spring is too long? I swapped out a Blazer axle with discs so I assumed the springs came with it? No ideas.
     
  21. ^^^^^^How many bolts are holding that spring shackle to the frame, two on just the outside frame rail? That could be a cause for the rear axle to shift side to side and rub on your inner fender in the picture above.
     
  22. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

    How much did you guys say an Art Morrison frame costs? :mad:
     
  23. olscrounger
    Joined: Feb 23, 2008
    Posts: 4,803

    olscrounger
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    No--fix what you have--those springs and brackets look odd to me and I have done a bunch of 40's
     
  24. I dunno, but it looks like someone cut and welded the shackles?

    Looks to me someone came up with what looked like a easy bolt in with little thought or comprehension about proper engineering.

    Not a disaster because the frame hasn't been hacked, but I would suggest a known quantity bolt-in from Chassis Engineering/Heidts to replace what you have. Same deal, but proper. And make sure everything is square at the same time.
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  25. 40 Flier
    Joined: Jun 28, 2008
    Posts: 73

    40 Flier
    Member
    from Michigan

    olscrounger and X38, great looking cars, what kind of suspensions are you running? To your points I suspect the springs, whatever they are, are too long for this application? I'm anxious to see what Eaton Spring proposes though it won't be cheap. I've been at this car for 12 years.
     
  26. i.rant
    Joined: Nov 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,570

    i.rant
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    1. 1940 Ford

    @40 Flier
    olscrounger has built over a dozen 40’s. Each one I’ve seen had perfect stance and proportions.
    If he says “something works” save yourself some grief, bite the bullet and follow his advice.
    BTW, another vote for 235/75/15 rear tire. :D
     
  27. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 21,372

    alchemy
    Member

    Yes, it's not time to buy new springs for those hokey mounts. It's time to buy a whole new kit with a good stance built in. Do what olscrounger suggests. Most kits are pretty much a bolt in anymore, so the only real fab required might be some brake lines and exhaust.
     
    olscrounger, lothiandon1940 and X38 like this.
  28. Darin Younce
    Joined: May 8, 2019
    Posts: 589

    Darin Younce

    YES.
     
    lothiandon1940 likes this.
  29. 36ford40
    Joined: Jun 1, 2010
    Posts: 15

    36ford40
    Member

    When I did my 40, I used an 8'' ford Granada rear and spring pack with shortened top spring and REVERSED EYES centered in the opening. I also vote yes on the 235/75/15. Ran great. go with oldscroungers advice
     
    olscrounger and lothiandon1940 like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.