Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods The all inclusive,almighty Y block thread

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Roothawg, Feb 16, 2021.

  1. Baumi
    Joined: Jan 28, 2003
    Posts: 3,190

    Baumi
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I´d like to throw out a question to you fellow Y-block folks, my friend Jay has an E -Code 57 Ford with the dual quad 312 on it and I know those manifolds are pretty much made of unobtainium. His car runs very well and surprised me quite a bit. Is there a good aftermarket dual quad manifold? I´m running an Offy 3x2 with 3 94s and whild I do like the looks it just doesn´t perform well, the Holleys keep leaking on me and after a whole lot of headaches I´ve got it run better-ish on only the center carb. I feel like a 2x4 setup with AFBs could set thing thing on fire. Of course now it´s only a 2bbl in fact, but I just don´t want to tinker anymore with those leakin Holleys
     
    Spooky, rpm56 and Roothawg like this.
  2. japchris
    Joined: Apr 21, 2001
    Posts: 362

    japchris
    Member
    from England

    My Merc -
    [​IMG]
    My Rod -
    [​IMG]
    A home-made set-up I cobbled together years ago -


    [​IMG]Baumi - Have sent you a message.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2021
  3. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,502

    Roothawg
    Member

    So here are a few basic questions.

    What camshafts do Y blocks respond best to?
    What intake works best on the street?
    What's the average cfm carb that work the best?
    What intakes to avoid? I know with Nailheads, Offy 3x2 is the one to avoid.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  4. silent rick
    Joined: Nov 7, 2002
    Posts: 5,416

    silent rick
    Member

  5. egads
    Joined: Aug 23, 2011
    Posts: 1,423

    egads
    Member

    Last edited: Feb 17, 2021
    loudbang and Roothawg like this.
  6. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,183

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    These don’t leak, not a Ford intake and needs no special valley cover. AFB’s are adaptable as this manifold I bought had them but I did not want AFB’s. There one on E-Bay right now for $450 which about right. 2 adapter’s and 2AFB’s ought to get you in about $1200 ... 94F88D13-ECB5-4D1C-B1A6-9B2C656FDD95.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2021
  7. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

     
  8. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 21,669

    alchemy
    Member

    If you are a Y-block fan do NOT go to this link. It will take you hours to get out of there. ;)
     
    Spooky, loudbang, williebill and 4 others like this.
  9. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

    Those photos show there's more space than first thought.

    I have the Wilwood/w proportioning valve, but also Sanderson ceramic-coated headers. The Sanderson's provide more space between master cylinder, and the ceramic coating is supposed to reduce under-hood temps.

    Catalogs list OEM master's "heat shield" as a drip pan.
     
  10. Baumi
    Joined: Jan 28, 2003
    Posts: 3,190

    Baumi
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Jimmy , is that a # 257 Edelbrock intake that you are running?
     
    loudbang and Roothawg like this.
  11. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,183

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yes. A 255 would have matched the 55-56 ports but this one came along. I removed the name and number and media blasted it. Found on E-bay 6 years ago.

    Roothawg. Same for a y. Avoid an Offenhauser 3-2.
    Best street is a 57 B or a Blue Thunder manifolds as they both have a heat crossover. Mummert doesn’t have the heat crossover. Many like the Summit 500 Carb which is out of stock currently. Ted Eaton’s tests show up to a 750cfm can make great power but for me on the street I look smaller. Even tho I run dual quads each is supposedly in the 375 range and I drive on the rear one 99% of the time. It’s the 1% that’s fun.
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2021
    loudbang, egads and Roothawg like this.
  12. Nice rabbit hole huh?!
     
  13. Love Y Bocks & have been collecting speed parts & stuff since I got into Hot Rods. Lot's of good info here for some future builds. Thanks!
     
    Spooky, loudbang, egads and 1 other person like this.
  14. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,336

    sunbeam
    Member

    Howards HRC292002-10 Or something with the duration in the 220 @ 50 range
     
    loudbang likes this.
  15. Roothawg
    Joined: Mar 14, 2001
    Posts: 25,502

    Roothawg
    Member

    So, they like a short duration. Basically, like a 283 Chevy.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  16. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

    Not necessarily, they are still internal-combustion engines/air pumps. I chose 214 duration @ .050 because I have 2.72 rear gear, but 2.90 1st compensates somewhat. For any daily-driven vehicle under 350 cu. in., I would keep duration at/below 220. However, you have to consider your total combination and what you want it to do. Putting a big cam in a heavy car, numerically-low gears, low compression, and restricted heads is just plain dumb. The same goes for big carbs.
     
    Roothawg likes this.
  17. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

    I forgot to say that I had considered the aforementioned Howard's cam, but Howard's never responded to several requests for the cam card, even though I used their contact form on their website. You'll get a much better response from either Ken Heard of Oregon Cams or Jerry Cantrell of Schneider Racing Cams.
     
    Roothawg likes this.
  18. ramblin dan
    Joined: Apr 16, 2018
    Posts: 3,802

    ramblin dan

    Took theses pics at a cruise night about ten years ago. IMG_1188.JPG IMG_1189.JPG
     
  19. Thanks for posting this thread! Subscribed...
    My first decent car was a '54 Ford that came with the 239 Y-block, my dad and I replaced it with a 312. I was 16 and really enjoyed it up until I wrecked it! I have owned several '54's over the years as well as a couple '56's, a '54 F100 and a '55 F100. My current ride is a '56 with a 312/Fordomatic and I plan on keeping this one... 5.JPG
     
  20. astep
    Joined: Jan 22, 2006
    Posts: 22

    astep
    Member
    from central ca

    3 pages of comments and no mention of the 1957 supercharged 312
     
  21. 55blacktie
    Joined: Aug 21, 2020
    Posts: 850

    55blacktie

    You're talking 6 figures+ for an F-code.
     
    Spooky and Boneyard51 like this.
  22. I am on the hunt for a wagon or Ford pickup just so I can have @mctim64 build me a Y block
     
    loudbang and Roothawg like this.
  23. There's a '56 2 door wagon on Facebook Marketplace...
     
  24. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,628

    Boneyard51
    Member

    I think that’s in my neck of woods. Maybe!





    Bones
     
    Tman and loudbang like this.
  25. Truckedup
    Joined: Jul 25, 2006
    Posts: 4,660

    Truckedup
    Member

    The Y block is just like the other long gone V8's of 50's It responds to the usual hot rod tricks and makes enough power especially in a light car....As mentioned, the biggest mistake you can make is overcam the engine and wind up with a lumpy dog.
     
    BradinNC and mctim64 like this.
  26. redzula
    Joined: Jul 6, 2011
    Posts: 1,270

    redzula
    Member

    Out of curiosity why should a guy avoid the 3x2?

    Too much carb? Too much to syncing multiple carbs. Complete novice here just curious.
    -Adam

    Sent from my rotary phone using The H.A.M.B. mobile app
     
    loudbang likes this.
  27. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 21,669

    alchemy
    Member

    The Easton site shows actual dyno testing with Offy and Edelbrock 3-2 manifolds. The Offy was horrible. The Edelbrock was good. The Mummert 4 barrel was even better, but who really wants a boring 4 barrel?
     
  28. Was happy with my stock old 64 Ford pick up with the old grannie gear.....never let me down !
     
    loudbang and Boneyard51 like this.
  29. 57JoeFoMoPar
    Joined: Sep 14, 2004
    Posts: 6,379

    57JoeFoMoPar
    Member

    I'm an admitted opponent of the Y block after a bad experience I had with one years ago. While I can still say that there are certain design aspects of the Y block that I find dopey, I can also admit now that with 20 years of experience in working on cars that I would have been able to overcome several of the issues I encountered then and probably would have kept a Y block in my 57 if I had to do it over again. I keep a running 292 around just in case I decide I need it for something.

    I do think the Y block is a good hot rod engine, especially for a street car. I'd say it's probably mid-range in terms of price for parts. Obviously more expensive than a SBC or Ford Windsor, but still less expensive than Olds, Hemi, Caddy, etc. I think the Y block fills a role in the Ford lineup of engines where you want a nostalgic engine but also want an engine that makes more power than a Flathead.

    I think the elephant in the room with the Y block are the supposed top end oiling issues. I'd love to hear about some folks experiences in that regard.
     
    BradinNC and Boneyard51 like this.
  30. Boneyard51
    Joined: Dec 10, 2017
    Posts: 6,628

    Boneyard51
    Member

    The engine actually had no issues, it was poor oil and mostly poor maintenance. At one time we were running four Y-blocks on the ranch. But they were mostly bought new and maintained. We never had any problems with the Y-blocks. And we worked them! One 292 was in an F-600 with a 22 ft flat bed. We loaded that with watermelons many times and hauled them in a three state area. That truck would also haul ten ricks of firewood , too.
    It all comes down to maintenance!
    None of our engines ever plugged up, but I did see other engines that did. But this was the same era, that I could pull valve covers off a sbc and read Chevrolet in the crud!



    Bones
     
    Spooky, warbird1, mctim64 and 7 others like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.