Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Dana 41 rear axle info & applications

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by mbstude, Feb 22, 2021.

  1. mbstude
    Joined: Oct 6, 2007
    Posts: 185

    mbstude
    Member

    Hi all, I'm trying to find a 3.91 or 4.09 ring and pinion for a Dana 41 rear end. I've been told that late 40's Ford pickups and some Merc cars used these.. Anyone have any specific insight, or even better, a source for a ring and pinion? Thank you
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2021
  2. oldiron 440
    Joined: Dec 12, 2018
    Posts: 3,835

    oldiron 440
    Member

    just goggle Dana 41 parts there are many suppliers, apparently Jeeps used the axels.
     
    anthony myrick likes this.
  3. mbstude
    Joined: Oct 6, 2007
    Posts: 185

    mbstude
    Member

    I’ve scoured the Internet for hours, and called various Willys and early Ford vendors. No dice.
     
  4. F-ONE
    Joined: Mar 27, 2008
    Posts: 3,619

    F-ONE
    Member
    from Alabama

    1948-50 Ford F1 should have the Dana 41. 51-52 F1 is when they started to go to the Dana 44. V8 48-50 F1s were 3.73. 6 cylinder trucks were lower.
     
  5. Used in Ford F-1 pickups 48-50? 3.73 or 3.92 ratio if I recall. I think I have one here somewhere...
     
  6. mbstude
    Joined: Oct 6, 2007
    Posts: 185

    mbstude
    Member

    I’d have an interest in the 3.92 if you’d sell just the ring and pinion. Thanks!
     
  7. miker98038
    Joined: Jan 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,530

    miker98038
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  8. Why a 41 and not a 44 ? Those AMC mail Jeeps of the 1970's early 80's came with a posi and they weren't abused at all !
     
  9. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,305

    squirrel
    Member

    perhaps he has a car with a 41 rear in it, and wants to put some gears in it...so he needs 41 gears, not 44 gears?

    I have a Dana 45 rear, with 3.91 or 3.92 gears I forget which....it uses a different size pinion bearing than the 44. Factory equipment in a 1959 chevy half ton with posi
     
  10. mbstude
    Joined: Oct 6, 2007
    Posts: 185

    mbstude
    Member

    Right. My ‘46 Stude pickup has a Dana 41, but the 4.88 rear gears have to go.

    Swapping in a 44 (or anything else) would be too easy. Half the fun is in tracking down the obscure stuff.
     
  11. miker98038
    Joined: Jan 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,530

    miker98038
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The Dana 40 series has been around a long time. The various versions, 41,44,45, maybe a 43 confuse me to hell. Different axles, bearings, carriers, etc. just in Fords. Throw in the other applications it gets worse. I'm pretty sure the 44 in my bird came out of a truck somewhere along the way. Bigger axles and different bearings. Hack job welding on the perches, as the bird perches were different from the car and trucks. After all these years, who knows what got changed when the junkyards were still full of them.

    What I do know is after 3 gear changes, straightening the tubes, cleaning up the bad welds, etc. I'd be money ahead having put a whole new rear axle in with a pumpkin I could change myself. I can't do the whole gear set. There's a discussion going on at the barn now about someone trying to find the right specs to do that.
     
  12. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,305

    squirrel
    Member

    interesting...I did a little googling, someone 15 years ago with a stude asked Spicer and got this reply:

    I could find no Spicer interchanges for the Studebaker part numbers that you provided [523660 case and 195117 case]. There is no application information for any vehicles using the Model 41 axle. However, I did find an assembly drawing of a 41-2 axle with a bill-of-material number of 2081. No customer information appears on the drawing, so I don't know whose vehicle it was designed for. I will assume that it is typical for all Model 41 applications. This bill-of-material was available with 3.73, 4.09, 4.55 and 5.38 gear ratios. The 3.73 and 4.09 ratios used a differential case with a part number of 15998 which was made from casting number 15999. The 4.55 and
    5.38 ratios used a differential case with a part number of 15518 which was made from a casting number 13828. Nothing that I was able to find indicated exactly where the ratio break was between the two cases.

    The numerically high ratio case (4.55 and 5.38) part number 15518, had a dimension from the centerline of the cross shaft to the mounting flange for the ring gear of 1.0625". The numerically low ratio case (3.73 and 4.09)part number 15998, had a dimension from the centerline of the cross shaft to the mounting flange for the ring gear of 1.250". There is a difference of 0.1875" between the two. You asked if it is possible to machine the flange of the high ratio case to allow mounting of low ratio gears. The flange thickness is 13/32" (0.40625"). If you remove 0.1875" from it, you will have a flange thickness of 0.21875". I would not recommend doing this. You are
    correct in your assumption that Dana doesn't have either of these cases anymore.

    You also asked if there is a copy of the original parts list available. Since I was unable to identify the bill-of-material number that was used in your Studebaker, I used the only one that I could find. It is highly unlikely that we have a copy of the one that you seek."
     
    mbstude likes this.
  13. mbstude, don’t know if this is of any help as it is taller than you are looking for and might need a different series carrier but Early Ford V8 Sales has new 3.54:1 gears for sale for the ‘48-50 Ford half ton that also used the Dana 41. 8C-4209-HS is their part number
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.