Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Frame boxing plates ‘66 C10

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 1937chopford, Jan 14, 2023.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 1937chopford
    Joined: Apr 6, 2017
    Posts: 71

    1937chopford

    Hi all I’m looking for some frame boxing plates or other options to stiffen the frame on my ‘66 C10. I didn’t really want to go with a restomod frame brace kit just something to box the frame I think. I’ll welcome any thoughts or ideas. Thank you
     
  2. junkman8888
    Joined: Jan 28, 2009
    Posts: 1,071

    junkman8888
    Member

    I'd check with the Chevy pickup forums to see if anyone there has any insight on how to approach making boxing plates as there doesn't appear to be anything commercially available. Having one of those pickups I ***ure you boxing the frame would not be an easy or quick process.
     
  3. Jokester
    Joined: Jan 29, 2005
    Posts: 798

    Jokester
    Member

    I think he means a 1965..
     
  4. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,521

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I have worked on a whole mess of these, and not once did I box the frame.

    Is there a reason why you feel that you need to box the frame on your 1965 Chevy truck?
     
    Johnny Gee likes this.
  5. hows about you measure inside the frame where you want to box, then cut some 3/16 or 1/4 inch thick flat stock and weld it in? Maybe nowdays they got an app for that **** so then just slide your phone under the truck and let your thumbs do the work. Jesus wept, we really have become 1-800 dependent..
     
    RMR&C, X38, Algoma56 and 1 other person like this.
  6. fastcar1953
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,145

    fastcar1953
    Member

    Plenty stiff as is. Why add weight to a heavy truck already.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  7. 1934coupe
    Joined: Feb 22, 2007
    Posts: 5,256

    1934coupe
    Member

    RJP. 3/16" or 1/4" is way over kill, I agree with Gimpy it's not needed but if you must 1/8" will work just fine.

    Pat
     
  8. 51504bat
    Joined: May 22, 2010
    Posts: 5,624

    51504bat
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Didn't @porkn****** have a C series p/u that **** and git? Don't know if it had the frame boxed but I doubt it. But as usual I could be wrong.
     
  9. LOL I was only throwing 444 pound feet at it. :D

    Most people here who have read a book think that boxing plates need to be heavy. They never ever need to be heavier that the frame material itself and usually a boxing plate can be lighter. Example, let us suppose that the frame material is 16 gauge (.0625) you can easily gain all the added strength you will ever need for a car ch***is by using 18 gauge (.040). That said sometimes overkill is a good thing, better safe than sorry I suppose. ;)

    Yes @51504bat my frame was not boxed. I guess I could have boxed it but why add weight? That 4000 pound brick of a truck was already heaving enough. :D
     
  10. steeltappet
    Joined: Jan 3, 2010
    Posts: 91

    steeltappet
    Member
    from PA

    Have you checked your frame rivets and bushings?
    You might get more info on the 60-66 forum on the 67-72 chevy-gmc site.
     
  11. guthriesmith
    Joined: Aug 17, 2006
    Posts: 11,917

    guthriesmith
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I am also questioning why you want to box the frame. I have had several of these pickups and never once considered boxing the frame other than maybe in the area where I c-notched it for axle clearance. I had everywhere from hot rod pickups to ones that I pulled my car hauler with a race car on and never had any issues without a boxed frame.
     
    gimpyshotrods likes this.
  12. They are a beast of a hauler. I have owned several, at least one for every year they were built ('60-'66) and hauled at least one of everything with them.

    I have a lady friend in KCMO that has one with a blown 402 that she has driven everyday since about '97 or '98 (when I first knew her). When we met I was driving an OT small block powered mini truck. She used to tease me about driving it up into the bed and the 3 of us (my missus, her and me) taking a road trip. LOL
     
  13. junkman8888
    Joined: Jan 28, 2009
    Posts: 1,071

    junkman8888
    Member

    Guys, when I'm going down a bumpy road in my '63 I can look in the rear view mirror and watch the bed twist several inches in either direction so the truth is it may be hell for stout for carrying a load but pretty ****py when it comes to twist.

    One option is to find a GMC frame of the same vintage, they have an "X" support that goes almost the entire length of the frame.
     
  14. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,521

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It was specifically designed to do exactly what it is doing.

    That which cannot flex, breaks, and often catastrophically.
     
  15. I’m doing one now that will have well over 600ft pounds of torque
    No boxing
     
    guthriesmith and gimpyshotrods like this.
  16. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,203

    327Eric
    Member

    It's doing what it's designed to do. Truck frames are designed to flex. If you want it to be a truck, leave it. If you want a sports car or Mini Truck, and are changing the suspension , go for it. I put 500,000 miles on my 66 C10, and worked it hard in all situations street raced it like a stupid teenager, drag and road, towed trailers all over the western states, off road, etc. The 65 I am building for my dad has 350,000 miles on it. I have owned 14 others. Not even the 60 3/4 ton pulled out of the blackberries at a Gold Mining Claim in Nevada City had any frame damage, and this truck was the worst, most abused example I have ever seen. Not one had a crack or frame issue.
     
    guthriesmith and gimpyshotrods like this.
  17. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,521

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The only boxing that was done on anything that every left my shop was on the ones that were set up with bags or hydraulics, and needed to go all the way to the ground.

    That boxing was just the deep frame notch in the rear.
     
    guthriesmith likes this.
  18. Atwater Mike
    Joined: May 31, 2002
    Posts: 11,618

    Atwater Mike
    Member

    My former partner had a '64. Real pretty, nice strong truck. But when following behind it, the bed was so ****eyed it looked like somebody left a jack under one side of it!
    Think it forgot to 'untwist'!
     
  19. 38Chevy454
    Joined: Oct 19, 2001
    Posts: 6,787

    38Chevy454
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Torsional stiffness can be improved with boxing plates. Just like X member also improves torsional stiffness. What is end goal you are trying to achieve? There are always different methods to consider. Some much more practical than others.
     
  20. People buy boxing plates already made?

    I thought ya made a pattern and burned em out
     
    guthriesmith and VANDENPLAS like this.
  21. A Boner
    Joined: Dec 25, 2004
    Posts: 8,158

    A Boner
    Member

    Be safe, box the frame.
    -Boyd
     
    anthony myrick likes this.
  22. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,424

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I removed some steel from mine!

    20190429_181459.jpg 20190429_181345.jpg 20190429_181432.jpg

     
  23. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,521

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    There is a HUGE difference between a Model A frame, and a 1960-1966 C10 frame.
     
  24. 1937chopford
    Joined: Apr 6, 2017
    Posts: 71

    1937chopford

    RJP…. 1/4 inch boxing plates??? Ha while going out of your way to try to look like a know it all hot rod ***** you made yourself look stupid…. but that’s just my opinion you grumpy old redneck f**k haha.

    Jokster…… why would I mean ‘65?? and why wouldn’t I know what year my truck is? It’s a ‘66 as stated

    The reason I am interested in boxing the frame is because my truck has some custom work with a crate engine with Corvette front end, trans and rearend with half shafts. I’ve had more twist than I’d like under acceleration and looking into options…. not trying to make it rigid. I’ve seen some already stamped box plated for some of my other trucks and would rather get some laser cut ones than spend a day torching 1/4” plates and ****ing around with it like one pissy old ******* suggested. For those with solid advice it’s appreciated
     
    Last edited: Jan 16, 2023
  25. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,521

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    This board has a cutoff of 1965, and older. That's why.

    Everything else that you just mentioned is not accepted here.
     
    Moriarity likes this.
  26. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,424

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    1966 GM trucks are grandfathered in because they are (nearly) identical to 65's.
    We don't cater to the IRS mindset either, though I do have one in my Nova.
     
  27. indyjps
    Joined: Feb 21, 2007
    Posts: 5,396

    indyjps
    Member

    if you want to box your frame, its your call.
    The longer the boxing plates are, the more difficult to fit.
    You don't need solid boxing plates, sections are fine.
    Plan to rerun all lines that are currently on the frame.
    I wouldn't trust a laser cut full frame boxing plate -what frame did they use for the profile. You see it as a time savings, I see it as hours of final fitting
    Post pics when you get it welded up.
     
  28. manyolcars
    Joined: Mar 30, 2001
    Posts: 9,607

    manyolcars

    1/4" plates are insane. there is no reason to use anything thicker than the factory frame. Think about the guy who comes behind you who has to cut that 1/4" mess out.
     
  29. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,305

    Budget36
    Member

    I agree, but the few vehicles I have had with the same rearend style, were kind of a factory “box”. I’d always ***umed it was to let the suspension do the work and eliminate the frame from the equation?
    You’re pretty danged good on suspension things, thoughts on that for one like me who’s just ***uming? ;)
     
  30. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 37,466

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    X38, Lost in the Fifties and Budget36 like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.