Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Why not a 337?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by oliver westlund, Feb 10, 2023.

  1. goldmountain
    Joined: Jun 12, 2016
    Posts: 4,713

    goldmountain

    Lots of OHV engines with 337 cubes or more that are lighter and more cost affective.
     
  2. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,375

    finn
    Member

    But none made before 1948, are there?
     
    Deuces and oliver westlund like this.
  3. scotts52
    Joined: Apr 7, 2008
    Posts: 2,783

    scotts52
    Member

    Son, you're gonna drive me to drinkin......
     
    49ratfink, Toms Dogs, Deuces and 3 others like this.
  4. oliver westlund
    Joined: Dec 19, 2018
    Posts: 2,597

    oliver westlund
    Member

    True, an ls makes a good swap i hear lol
     
    Last edited: Feb 16, 2023
    JimSibley, scotts52 and winduptoy like this.
  5. oliver westlund
    Joined: Dec 19, 2018
    Posts: 2,597

    oliver westlund
    Member

    Nope!
     
    winduptoy likes this.
  6. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 14,729

    Budget36
    Member

    So a FH Ford weighs what, 450 lbs? With 239 ci.
    Can a factory 337 at 850 lbs put in the same 2500lb car, out running it in a straight line? Maybe. But I’d think in a 2500 lb car, the extra weight in front would bring up some handling issues with it. I’m not talking about auto cross type stuff, just day to day driving.
    Yea I can see the cool factor thing, but I wonder if the extra 300-350 lbs over the front end is worth it?
    I’ve no idea on what it cost for engine internal performance parts, cams/pistons, etc. are they available or custom made?
    Bringing up the Hemi isn’t a real comparison, I don’t think you get get (but I really don’t know) 700 HP out of a 337 vs a Hemi NA and have it live awhile.
    But for something cool and different from the norm, heck yeah. If you have one, want to be different, do it.
     
  7. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,402

    theHIGHLANDER
    Member

    When you box yourself in it comes at a cost. If you do this ya better build 2 of some of it. It's not like they're everywhere and anywhere, and how many that are strewn about are buildable? Let's look fwd, been done a few years but now you need a substantial repair/parts. Not like a generic flatty that you can get stuff nearly anywhere. If that's a boxing match you're up for then by all means tape the gloves on. This applies to more than an overweight truck motor of course. How come Pontiacs aren't popular? Packard V8s? Flathead Cad/LaSalle? Great engines but other than long legged top speed efforts zippy stoplight to stoplight performance isn't in their repertoire. I'm not being a dick, you asked opinions. Enough has been mentioned above about weight so I didn't bother. Can you? Sure. Should you? Only you and your hairdresser know for sure.;)
     
    Deuces, Packrat and oliver westlund like this.
  8. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,550

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    To clarify this, I just ran across blueprints of an original Ardun head in another thread. It says they were made of "355-T6 HEAT-TREATED ALCOA ALLOY"
     
  9. HAHAHAHAHAHA, love it :D
     
    Deuces likes this.
  10. Special Ed
    Joined: Nov 1, 2007
    Posts: 8,402

    Special Ed
    Member

    The 337 engines were also used in buses, larger Ford trucks, and some industrial applications, along with Lincolns. Muntz Jets also used them right up until Ford/Lincoln came out with overhead valve engines in 1952. I ran a rebuilt 337 along with an extremely heavy Hydramatic behind it in the first Jet that I built, back in the early nineties. It maneuvered like a very underpowered, overweight boat. :eek:
     
  11. I am usually a chebby man but as late model motors go the Coyote is a better looking mill. :D

    There actually were a few pretty good sized inline motors built before '48. Then of course there is always the Allison option. :D
     
  12. I think it's the same reason you don't see a lot of early Cadillac engines although you are more likely to see a Caddy then a Lincoln flathead.

    The limited numbers built due to the price a 49 Lincoln new cost 3,186 to $3,948, a 49 Cadillac club Coupe $2,900 and a convertible was about $3,400.

    A 49 Ford Tudor Sedan-$1,425 2 Door Wagon, 8 passenger -$2,119

    1949 Chevrolet $1,415, the four-door sedan at $1,460, the sport coupe at $1,420, and the business coupe at $1,340

    The income of the average family was $3,100.

    Lincolns and Cadillacs where expensive cars with a limit demand so there was a limit supply (even used those cars were worth a lot of money), if there was a limited supply when they were new there was going to be even fewer in the junkyards were most hot rodders and racer got their engine cores.
     
    Last edited: Nov 24, 2023
    Bluefox and oliver westlund like this.
  13. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,375

    finn
    Member

    I guess old Henry had a few swings and misses in the forties and early fifties. The commercial success of the venerable circa 1932 flathead v8 engine stifled creativity when it became time for engine development. The V12 Lincoln motor was introduced in the late thirties, when other luxury cars still had high cylinder count engines, but the 337 probably would have been a more profitable and reliable alternative, and would have potentially had a longer production run. By the time the 331 was actually produced , the entire industry was moving towards ohv engines.

    The 226 from 1941 could have been an ohv. The technology was well established by then, but politics, presumably from the old man himself stifled that possibility.

    Similarly, had the internal politics been different, the Y blocks, or a variant of them, could have debuted in the late forties instead of the revised, but obsolete flathead.

    Too little, too late.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2023
    Budget36 and oliver westlund like this.
  14. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,550

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    "337", not "331". That displacement worked well for Chrysler and Cadillac, though. Other than that, your post shows imagination and a significant lack of knowledge of the immediate post-war period.
     
  15. oliver westlund
    Joined: Dec 19, 2018
    Posts: 2,597

    oliver westlund
    Member

    Good enough for me! I dig it! Skratch was kind enough to share some extra pics Screenshot_20230212-190208_Instagram.jpg Screenshot_20230212-190221_Instagram.jpg Screenshot_20230212-190215_Instagram.jpg
     
  16. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,375

    finn
    Member

    Fixed the typo Mr historian.

    I was there, albeit a little young, and, I spent well over thirty years in the engine development industry. Did you?
     
    42merc likes this.
  17. hudsonjoe49
    Joined: Jan 1, 2007
    Posts: 242

    hudsonjoe49
    Member

    536EAC03-8630-4E82-95CB-76B7D0F9793F.jpeg ECD4FF9D-9C7B-42BA-AEDB-682BE81EAA3D.jpeg F571047D-B4F6-41D3-A308-C3634D173EDF.jpeg FB680989-A4B1-47D3-9579-F1EA3551B78A.jpeg 2E02DACD-6A52-4A83-9CDB-CA563EE6F027.jpeg Lincolns can be slow or fast. It’s all in the balancing, porting and relieving. I finished this car in 2005 and never stopped drag racing it until 2022. This car no longer exists in this form. It is now a landspeed car. Back to its roots. Let’s see what a Lincoln can do at El Mirage and Bonneville E1EE2014-2BC2-4937-9BC3-2870E3207E89.jpeg
     

    Attached Files:

  18. oliver westlund
    Joined: Dec 19, 2018
    Posts: 2,597

    oliver westlund
    Member

    Such a neat car, hope it holds its own at the salt. I have a feeling it will
     
    Stogy likes this.
  19. oliver westlund
    Joined: Dec 19, 2018
    Posts: 2,597

    oliver westlund
    Member

    I was being a smartass with my ls comment. I dig inline engines!
     
    Stogy and Budget36 like this.
  20. Speed Gems
    Joined: Jul 17, 2012
    Posts: 6,741

    Speed Gems
    Member

  21. oliver westlund
    Joined: Dec 19, 2018
    Posts: 2,597

    oliver westlund
    Member

    Ive seen that one, good video!
     
  22. oliver westlund
    Joined: Dec 19, 2018
    Posts: 2,597

    oliver westlund
    Member

    I am also gonna be building a factory dual quad 312 y block....and i have a 337 cad flatty.... lots of ponys in the stable if the lincoln give me too much guff. I think its cool and will scoot
     
    theHIGHLANDER, scotts52 and Papas32 like this.
  23. john worden
    Joined: Nov 14, 2007
    Posts: 1,834

    john worden
    Member
    from iowa

    .........and hydraulic seat actuator. And possibly convertible top. Plus they sound great even through giant twin oval mufflers.
     
    oliver westlund likes this.
  24. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,336

    sunbeam
    Member

    320 Buick about the same weight and more power same time frame
     
    SS327 likes this.
  25. Here4Flatheads
    Joined: Dec 27, 2022
    Posts: 1

    Here4Flatheads


    I've always loved old cars, and I recently got into flatheads. I just bought a 1950 Ford F7 with the original 337 that I plan on (lightly) hotrodding the engine in. If you have any more pictures or video of your car, I'd love to see them :)
     
    oliver westlund likes this.
  26. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 14,729

    Budget36
    Member

    Is the plan for the truck, or engine in a different vehicle? Just curious!
     
    oliver westlund and SS327 like this.
  27. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,219

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    Here4, show us your plans. If it was me, I would do something stupid like replace the 337 flatty with a 6-71 Detroit. Because if 150 Hp from 850 lbs is good, 170 hp from 2100 lbs has to be better, right? Then build a roadster around the 337, just so I can haul it around on the back of the F7.
     
  28. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,189

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Engine class will be XXO………body class a modified roadster
     
    oliver westlund likes this.
  29. Hemi Joel
    Joined: May 4, 2007
    Posts: 1,602

    Hemi Joel
    Member
    from Minnesota

    The Lincoln/Ford truck flathead 337 V8 is 635 pounds with aluminum heads and intake. That's not horrible. You could probably get 20 more pounds off the crank with some lathe time. https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/threads/weight-of-a-ford-linclon-337-big-block-flathead.832985/

    It is basically a scaled up flathead Ford. Just bigger in every dimension. More cubes, bigger, better ports, bigger valves, modern valve guide/spring arrangement, updated cooling passages. It's not for everyone. But if you love the flathead v8, and you want it bigger and more powerful the easy way, the 337 is the ticket.
     
    CSPIDY, oliver westlund and 51504bat like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.