Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects .

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 31Vicky with a hemi, Sep 12, 2023.

  1.  
    Last edited: Sep 14, 2023
    Deuces and chryslerfan55 like this.
  2. Pete Eastwood
    Joined: Jul 27, 2011
    Posts: 1,316

    Pete Eastwood
    Member
    from california

    392 heads only work on a 392 . . .
     
    rod1, HemiDeuce, Deuces and 2 others like this.
  3. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    Well, they do bolt on so I'd make that a 'fit', the problem is then intakes. In stock form the larger 112cc chamber lowers c/r in a 331 or 354. And, as you surmise, the t-stat manifold is then a problem.
    On a street engine, even at elevated hp/tq numbers, I can't see any benefit to swapping heads. The vaunted 55-331 head has been called the holy grail for too many years w/o anyone suggesting why.....perhaps the small 100cc chamber that would raise c/r a wee bit is/was to blame.
    My 2 cents.
     
    31Vicky with a hemi likes this.
  4. Mike VV
    Joined: Sep 28, 2010
    Posts: 3,329

    Mike VV
    Member
    from SoCal

    Again.....NO details !!!

    WHAT...............do you want to do with the car, boat, truck, lawn mower ?

    1 - The 392 heads work fine with proper intake port porting if performance is your goal.

    2 - The 354 are a little better for the drag strip (YES...THEY DO FIT). But they need spacers for any intake manifold to work.
    Also need intake port, porting to work well for performance.

    3 - 331 heads...na.

    Mike
     
  5. Whats wrong with 55' 331 heads?
     
    Deuces likes this.
  6. I think "most" 392 builds run 392 heads. If you look at Hemi pictures, very few have spacers to accomidate low deck heads on a 392. The water crossover is the same for low deck and raised in stock form. Low deck heads on a 392 screws that all up.
     
    Deuces and 31Vicky with a hemi like this.
  7. silent rick
    Joined: Nov 7, 2002
    Posts: 5,582

    silent rick
    Member

    by most popular, do you mean now or back when there was an abundance of parts available, today its whatever you can come up with
     
    Deuces and Just Gary like this.
  8. Mike VV
    Joined: Sep 28, 2010
    Posts: 3,329

    Mike VV
    Member
    from SoCal

    Most...popular...is the simplest, 392 heads on a 392+ engine.

    Mike
     
  9. I was thinking the 55 heads had the best flowing ports ? ,,,,according to most in the know .

    Tommy
     
    Deuces likes this.
  10. I heard the same thing. Personaly I think the 354 heads are the same, but i am no expert by any means. somehow i doubt there were few if any changes in the low deck passenger heads after '55.
    Do these questions stem from your quest a few years back to have a water crossover made like the one PAW had?
     
    Deuces likes this.
  11. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    All three pairs of my 354 heads are identical.
     
    Deuces likes this.
  12. deucemac
    Joined: Aug 31, 2008
    Posts: 1,635

    deucemac
    Member

    When I built my 354 for my roadster, I used a block from a 58 Dodge 2 1/2 ton truck. One head was busted because the truck was hit from the side and broke the head. Truck heads didn't interest me anyhow and I started looking for 56 354 passenger car heads. I found out that 55 331 triple nickel heads were exactly the same except for part number. I called everywhere looking for for a set of those heads. If I found a set or 56 heads, they were outrageously expensive and was told that ALL the drag racers used them on 392's because they had the best short return radius on the exhaust ports. BUT, if I found a set of 55 triple nickel heads then THEY were the best and all the racers used THEM on 392's because those heads had the best they had the best short return radius on the exhaust port! They were also outrageously expensive. I was at my wit's end when I remembered Joe Reath. When I worked flight test for Douglas, Joe had his shop across the street from Douglas on Cherry Ave in Long Beach and we would hang out there when we had time. So, I called Joe to see what his opinion was, since he has been involved in racing since they raced using 3 inch wide wheels. I told Joe about the cost of 354/ 55 triple nickel heads and how everybody said that the ones they had were the best. Joe laughed and said, "Have you ever heard of a named Don Garlits?" Of course I had and Joe continued, "Well, he ran 392 heads on his 392's and beat EVERYBODY!". Joe had a pair of 354 heads salted away and offerected them to me. They had been ported, 426 valves, triple valve springs because Joe only knew one word with hemi...blower. I asked him how much he wanted and he said $900, ready to bolt on. Most of the 354/triple nickel guys wanted $500 for one bare head. I snapped them up, replaced the valve springs with ones to match my Schneider cam and have been happy ever since, 40 plus thousand miles later. Apparently drag racers are as bad as sprint car racers I used to run with. They NEVER had a problem driving a car fast, it was all the fault of not having the same equipment as the really fast guys had. Monkey see monkey do, rather than admit that no matter what the equipment, they just didn't have the talent the "really
     
  13. Probably
     
  14. 402BOSSMAN
    Joined: Jul 26, 2015
    Posts: 499

    402BOSSMAN
    Member

    331 Heads have the best performance potential
    354 next
    then 392
    then 1953 or earlier are last.
    331/354 heads require a 5/8" intake spacer to work with the tall deck 392 block.
    Most popular would be a 331 head on a 392 block.
     
    31Vicky with a hemi likes this.
  15. 402BOSSMAN
    Joined: Jul 26, 2015
    Posts: 499

    402BOSSMAN
    Member

    What would you like to know?
     
  16. Stan Back
    Joined: Mar 9, 2007
    Posts: 2,639

    Stan Back
    Member
    from California

    Joe Reath sold us a set of 354 street pistons. They were an 1/8 inch down in the hole. He wouldn't take them back. We contacted the piston manufacturer (Silvolite sp?) and they said they'd been making them like that for Reath for years -- to his specifications.
     
  17. Marty Strode
    Joined: Apr 28, 2011
    Posts: 9,589

    Marty Strode
    Member

    In '88 when I built this 392 with 55 heads, as per Gene Adams instructions, I remember making some stepped dowels to fit the larger hole in the 55 heads.

    2014-03-27 124010.jpg
     
    saltracer219 and Desoto291Hemi like this.
  18. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,907

    George
    Member

    "392 heads on 331" Water crossover would have to be custom, unless HH or someone has them made up special. Intake manifolds won't fit unless you use a twin log style or get an unwelded U-Fab style.
     
  19. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,907

    George
    Member

    That's what Garlits said in the Tex Smith hemi book. 392 heads vs 55-56 heads. On the 55-56 heads w/o valves you can see in the intake port & see right out the ex port, which would be good for flow if you could run one w/o valves, or if it was a 2 stroke engine. The 392 heads are squished down a bit & you can't see all the way through, but where it's a 4 stroke engine it apparently doesn't make much difference.
     
  20. 402BOSSMAN
    Joined: Jul 26, 2015
    Posts: 499

    402BOSSMAN
    Member

    Gene takes a stock 3/8 pushrod and cuts little length pieces to press into the head to fit over the smaller dowel. At least that's the trick he taught me.
     
    winduptoy likes this.
  21. 402BOSSMAN
    Joined: Jul 26, 2015
    Posts: 499

    402BOSSMAN
    Member

    Nobody makes the crossover for what you seek. Going to need to cut and weld one up. Arias Racing Components has one that you can add some material to.
     
    winduptoy likes this.
  22. Pretty sure he is looking at manufacturing one to sell. He has talked about it before not sure why it seems to be a secret now.
     
    402BOSSMAN likes this.
  23. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

  24. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,401

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    No market for it. If there were, it would exist.
     
  25. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,028

    Budget36
    Member

    Heck, I was enjoying the education, but seems the OP doesn’t want to deal with the thread anymore.
     
  26. winduptoy
    Joined: Feb 19, 2013
    Posts: 3,956

    winduptoy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yes...the thread description got sent into fiber optic orbit and tough I'll probably never run a hemi, I was enjoying the conversation and education
    removing the title is a novel way to get us to go away
     
  27. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    Scrapping the title will ensure that it won't be found in any search for 392 info.:cool:
     
    winduptoy and Happydaze like this.
  28. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 7,953

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I thought I read someplace (I believe it was on this forum) that truck heads had some of the largest ports and were among the best if the sodium-filled exhaust valves were replaced. I have a '56 331 out of a dump truck and it has the 4 bolt exhaust manifolds, which were used on the 300's. This says something to me.
     
    winduptoy likes this.
  29. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    The only problem with the truck head is the water crossover instead of exhaust. Perfect for that truck running 20hrs straight in an Iowa wheat field, but not needed for pass cars. The port is tall and skinny so needs to be 'shrunk' to match pass car intake and its easy enough to do.
    Nothing wrong with the sodium filled exhaust valves if you keep the rpms down.
     
    tubman likes this.
  30. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,595

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon


    Bump

     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.