Register now to get rid of these ads!

History One-year only body styles, or "WTF were they thinking?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 62rebel, Sep 21, 2023.

  1. tomcat11
    Joined: Mar 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,001

    tomcat11
    Member

    61 Ford Starliner fast back.
    1961-ford-starliner.jpg
     
  2. tomcat11
    Joined: Mar 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,001

    tomcat11
    Member

  3. Commodoreswab
    Joined: Feb 12, 2011
    Posts: 337

    Commodoreswab
    Member
    from West TN

    Hey! I'm public and I like my 29. . .I guess like so many models they were ahead of the time judging by the current public approval.
    Screenshot_20230928-073359.png
     
    osage orange likes this.
  4. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,026

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    58 Impalas were f**king gross in my opinion…All the BelAirs thru the Biscayne’s were great…
     
    osage orange and das858 like this.
  5. Bill's Auto Works and j hansen like this.
  6. MMM1693
    Joined: Feb 8, 2009
    Posts: 1,365

    MMM1693
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Well christsake for the daggers!
     
    chevy57dude likes this.
  7. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,341

    finn
    Member

    The jailbar actually started production in 1942, and was produced in limited numbers through the war years for military and essential commercial business use. That means a six year production run……sort of.

    Lots of 42ish Marion Herrington sno go conversions went to Alaska and the upper Midwest for air base runway clearing. Most ended up in local municipalities after the war, based on what I see turn up.
     
  8. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,341

    finn
    Member

    Roof and inner panels are the same, to some extent as 1960, and the doors, fenders, and hood carried over to 62, although most wouldn’t recognize that.
     
  9. tomcat11
    Joined: Mar 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,001

    tomcat11
    Member

    Interesting, so do you consider it a one year only body style? I thought it was but, this could be splitting hairs. Individual panels although they might be common among some years does not really constitute a a completed body style. It's still a great looking car. I'll delete it if it's not accurate. Thanks
     
    jimmy six likes this.
  10. 8flat
    Joined: Apr 2, 2006
    Posts: 1,392

    8flat
    Member

    Pfffft.......'33 chevy coupe, not only is most of it a 1 yr car, but they had the standard and the master eagle, each with different dimensions, body lines, and all. #gonzo
     

    Attached Files:

  11. phat rat
    Joined: Mar 18, 2001
    Posts: 4,973

    phat rat
    Member

    jnaki, I don't know if he still has it but close to 10 years ago in Kalispell Mt I was shown a 58 Nomad a fella had built himself. It looked very nice not a cobbled up mess
     
    jnaki likes this.
  12. nochop
    Joined: Nov 13, 2005
    Posts: 4,137

    nochop
    Member
    from norcal

    Don’t forget this beautiful example IMG_6263.jpeg
     
    Bob Lowry likes this.
  13. Starlinerdude
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 181

    Starlinerdude
    Member
    from Washington

    His question was for 1 year body styles not platforms, as far as platforms the same can be said for 58-64 GM full size and numerous other models that looked different from the outside but were basically the same underneath.
     
  14. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,341

    finn
    Member

    I’ll go back to the roof was the same as the 60, and the hood, doors, and front fenders were the same as the 62, as was much of the interior.

    61 Starliner is one of my all time favorites.

    A better example might be the 62 Plymouth. The underpinnings and powertrain were essentially the same as the 63 and 64, as well as the 65. The 62 had, if I recall, all unique sheet metal, while the 63=65 shared at least some exterior stamping.
     
  15. Mmmmmmmmmmmmm
    58 was a great year for styling
    IMG_5696.jpeg
     
    skooch, downlojoe33, Squablow and 5 others like this.
  16. Sky Six
    Joined: Mar 15, 2018
    Posts: 12,451

    Sky Six
    Member
    from Arizona

    '58 Impalas were the most beautiful Chibby ever made Jimmy...want to arm wrestle to see who's right.:D
     
  17. I had a 58 Buick and thought it was so ugly I was ashamed to drive it. It was a gift and I did drive it for a short while.
     
  18. 58-62 was the high water mark for US styling.
     
    Bill's Auto Works likes this.
  19. Hey @anthony myrick ....It was GREAT to meet you @ Lloydfest 2023, but that Ugly Christmas Sweater is HARD ON THE EYES!:eek::eek::eek:

    The older I get, the more I love the one year only/one off cars! I know it is OT, but my 67 Marlin incorporates the two things I love....Stacked headlights & an extreme fastback body style!

    God Bless
    Bill
    https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum...ar-transport-hauling-open-or-enclosed.614419/
     
  20. GM and Ford and baker got it wrong but AMC (Rambler) and Chrysler I think got it right as did all the USA truck manufacturers.
     
  21. mohr hp
    Joined: Nov 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,172

    mohr hp
    Member
    from Georgia

    I respectfully disagree! And I do like some of those boats, but, I'm glad we all don't feel the same way. For me it was 1931-1934.
     
  22. Yawn from me for 31-34
    Not bad, but can’t touch 35 up rides.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2023
  23. mohr hp
    Joined: Nov 18, 2009
    Posts: 1,172

    mohr hp
    Member
    from Georgia

    Sigh. Mkay................................................................................................
     
    Bill's Auto Works likes this.
  24. Crazy how we see things.
     
    mohr hp and Bill's Auto Works like this.
  25. A 2 B
    Joined: Dec 2, 2015
    Posts: 516

    A 2 B
    Member
    from SW Ontario

    Kinda borderline OT.
    At first glance you might think that '64, '65 and '66 Plymouth Barracuda sheet metal is the same but in fact I think they only share the same decklid. No other body panels will interchange. I think even the lockset for the decklid was relocated. I've had one in the garage since the early '70s. I've been sitting on a ton of extra body panels that are probably not worth any more than they were then.
     
  26. THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Joined: Jun 6, 2007
    Posts: 5,662

    THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER
    Member
    from FRENCHTOWN

    Yes
    and NO
    Look at that truck. It is curved and graceful, soft and sensual, starting at the swoopy rear fenders and moving forward to the art deco cab and arching front fenders, like a painting of a reclining nude...
    ...until you get to the grille. The opening has hard square corners and the vertical bars negaate all the gracefulness flowing in from the rest of the truck. The '40 - '41 was a much better front end treatment, but lacked a trucklike load carrying capacity, necessitating a wider, douuble spring front frame.
    The '46 Merc (Canadian) was at least a little better. IMO
     
  27. I’d prefer the jail bars over the 40.

    One of my favorite front ends.
     
    THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER likes this.
  28. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 6,969

    BamaMav
    Member
    from Berry, AL

    Do I need to call an ambulance? I know you've got to be sick talking like that....:D:D:D
    Everybody knows the 40 front end is perfection!:cool::cool::cool:
     
  29. Maybe the 39.
    I also dig the 38
    But yea, I know I’m in the minority


    That’s ok.
    I also dig school busses and step vans
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2023
    THE FRENCHTOWN FLYER likes this.
  30. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 6,969

    BamaMav
    Member
    from Berry, AL

    I can't say much....look at the hunk of Lincoln I drive. A face I had to learn to love. :D:D:D
     
    anthony myrick likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.