Register now to get rid of these ads!

VINTAGE SHOTS FROM DAYS GONE BY! (Part 2)

Discussion in 'The Antiquated' started by Ryan, Jun 17, 2019.

  1. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 26,396

    Deuces

    Damn, I had long hair like that once....:D:confused:
    That was a long time ago...:(
     
  2. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 26,396

    Deuces

    432686151_10222576116262726_7431564333779369578_n.jpg
    Larry Shinoda also designed the BOSS ponies and the 1969 Z/28.....
     
  3. jnaki
    Joined: Jan 1, 2015
    Posts: 10,981

    jnaki

    upload_2024-3-19_5-5-4.png








    Hello,

    Great shot of “Pedal Pusher” pants for girls and women from the late 50s to the time when bell bottom pants came onto the scene. These days, they are called cropped pants or a take on the 60s pants, the Capris.

    As early as the late 50s, the capri pants have been around and come/go with the current trends. But, why were they called Pedal Pusher pants? It was difficult to ride any bicycle with a full Poodle Skirt style outfit. The long material usually got caught in the chain or pedals. So, pants were worn. But the straight leg pants were also, floppy material and did get caught in the sprocket, pedals and chains.

    So, within no time, girls and women were wearing the latest designed pants with skinny tapered legs and now, the “catching in the chain, sprocket or pedals” was history. At the time, the pin pointed pants were not “officially” accepted as daily wear or wearing out in the general public unless one rode bicycles. But, gradually, the style was accepted and today, fall into the category of skinny leg pants, jeans or high activity pants. No pants clips were necessary to keep the material out of the sprocket/pedals or chain.

    Jnaki

    Note:

    The height of the end seam of the Pedal Pusher Pants were not as long as normal pants for women. So, they were not in the dressy category. That style came to be accepted as normal, daily wear much later. But, they served their purpose for bicycle activity. Cuffs, no cuffs, just a seam or mini cuffs were all added later as the styles changed with the styles.

    For men, Levis, regular pants, were all accepted and still got caught in the sprocket or chain. Such sacrifices in styles went along with the old hot rod style of big cuffs for Levis. That style was old hat by 1958. The no cuff edges or very narrow cuff if any, was the new look.

    Note 2:

    As clothing goes in style, in the mid to late 60s and into the early 70s, the bell bottom craze came into being with the widths ranging from mild width to wild 14+ inches around, flopping around as girls/women walked around. Those definitely needed bicycle clips. But the pedal pushers were still popular, too. Go figure…

    So, what about the men’s bell bottom pants, those were definite chain grabbers and clips were the obvious choices. Straight leg Levis to flared wide bottom versions, back to wide straight leg, and finally, back to the normal Levis we all wore in the 60s. Now, that is called style changes. Ha!

    Some of us followed the styling cues as necessary, but, the obvious answer became evident, surf shorts or styled shorts to eliminate all chain grabbing incidents. YRMV





     
    Wreck34, garage2small, D type and 9 others like this.
  4. swi66
    Joined: Jun 8, 2009
    Posts: 19,117

    swi66
    Member

  5. swi66
    Joined: Jun 8, 2009
    Posts: 19,117

    swi66
    Member

  6. Witchhammer
    Joined: Jul 31, 2018
    Posts: 5,951

    Witchhammer

  7. 67drake
    Joined: Aug 8, 2008
    Posts: 815

    67drake
    Member
    from Muscoda WI

    Wow, those must have weighed a ton, but badass looking for the day.
     
  8. Witchhammer
    Joined: Jul 31, 2018
    Posts: 5,951

    Witchhammer

  9. Witchhammer
    Joined: Jul 31, 2018
    Posts: 5,951

    Witchhammer

  10. Witchhammer
    Joined: Jul 31, 2018
    Posts: 5,951

    Witchhammer

  11. Witchhammer
    Joined: Jul 31, 2018
    Posts: 5,951

    Witchhammer

  12. Witchhammer
    Joined: Jul 31, 2018
    Posts: 5,951

    Witchhammer

  13. lewislynn
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,425

    lewislynn
    Member

  14. lewislynn
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,425

    lewislynn
    Member

  15. lewislynn
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,425

    lewislynn
    Member

    AKA B&M
     
  16. lewislynn
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,425

    lewislynn
    Member

    YES! It's what I always call "same thing only different".
     
  17. lewislynn
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,425

    lewislynn
    Member

  18. MacTexas
    Joined: Feb 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,368

    MacTexas
    Member
    from DFW

  19. Not gonna do it, no, wouldn’t be prudent, nope you can’t convince me otherwise.
     
  20. jeepsterhemi
    Joined: Dec 5, 2009
    Posts: 25,918

    jeepsterhemi
    Member

  21. jeepsterhemi
    Joined: Dec 5, 2009
    Posts: 25,918

    jeepsterhemi
    Member

  22. jeepsterhemi
    Joined: Dec 5, 2009
    Posts: 25,918

    jeepsterhemi
    Member

  23. jeepsterhemi
    Joined: Dec 5, 2009
    Posts: 25,918

    jeepsterhemi
    Member

  24. jeepsterhemi
    Joined: Dec 5, 2009
    Posts: 25,918

    jeepsterhemi
    Member

  25. jeepsterhemi
    Joined: Dec 5, 2009
    Posts: 25,918

    jeepsterhemi
    Member

  26. jeepsterhemi
    Joined: Dec 5, 2009
    Posts: 25,918

    jeepsterhemi
    Member

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.