Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical SBC TO EARLY FORD TRANS: HELP!! UPDATE 4/4

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by hotrodA, Feb 27, 2024.

  1. I’ve been having issues with what should be a relatively easy engine swap: SBC to a 41 Ford open drive trans in my 40 coupe. I researched this all over here and everywhere before lifting a wrench. Plus, I did this with no problems in an 47, but years ago. Apparently missed something!!
    https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum...-updated-2-15-24.1265297/page-8#post-15142054

    Here are the particulars, to save going through the whole build thread.

    >SBC 350 with one piece rear seal. Fresh build.
    >Vintage CRAGAR trans adapter
    >New billet flywheel for one piece crank and B&B pressure plate
    >New $$ B&B pressure plate and disc from Ft. Wayne Clutch. Correct for swap, per them.
    >New pilot bushing for crank and trans shaft
    >Trans, throw out bearing, fork, shaft and linkage same as when the flathead was in it.
    >Checked clutch arm center hole diameter, equal to flathead Long type.

    Everything went together as well as expected.
    Trans and adapter all bolted up nicely.
    I thought that I checked TO bearing contact with clutch arms at that time.
    Adjusted clutch rod and pedal free play @ 1”

    The problem is: I can push the pedal from inside all the way to the floor with only light resistance
    Not the leg resistance that you would expect when the TO bearing hits and compresses the pressure plate springs.

    Suspected: TO bearing too small diameter, goes inside clutch arms.
    Pin that locks TO bearing carrier to cross shaft is sheared or missing, allowing shaft to rotate loose.

    Solutions: Pull carpet, trans cover, inspection plate and see if anything is obvious. GROAN
    Pull trans out and look for correct TO bearing movement or issues. DOUBLE GROAN!!
    Throw the 41 trans away and put in a TH350!
    Sell the SOB as is and give the F**K up!

    HELP!! This engine swap is physically and mentally wearing my old butt out! I need to be driving it.

    Any REAL LIFE advice or suggestions will be greatly appreciated! KISS theory for me.
    Thanks!
    Bill
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2024
    chryslerfan55 likes this.
  2. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,719

    -Brent-
    Member

    Never surrender, it's an all out attack! You've got to go through the suck to diagnose this thing, unfortunately.

    I believe you've got to be close in your reasoning with the TO bearing.
     
    hotrodA and chryslerfan55 like this.
  3. Give up? Surely you can’t be serious?
     
    hotrodA likes this.
  4. continentaljohn
    Joined: Jul 24, 2002
    Posts: 5,827

    continentaljohn
    Member

    Bill if it was me I would pull back the carpet and get to the inspection plate. It will tell you what’s the issue. I’m sure it’s something dumb and hopefully a easy fix.
     
    The Chevy Pope, hotrodA and big duece like this.
  5. Thanks, guys!
    “Dumb and easy to fix”has my name written all over it. Let’s hope so.
     
  6. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,348

    alchemy
    Member

    Ida been watching it operate through the small inspection hole before the trans cover went on. Do that now.
     
    hotrodA likes this.
  7. Yep. Skipped that step when it went together. Transmission stayed in the car, engine went in.
    I ASSumed, that since it was working fine before……..DOH!!
     
  8. continentaljohn
    Joined: Jul 24, 2002
    Posts: 5,827

    continentaljohn
    Member

    Your so close to getting her going now so go pull back that carpet :D
     
    hotrodA likes this.
  9. UPDATE: Finally got to deal with this.

    Got the carpet and jute pulled back after a struggle (4hrs) getting the glued together layers of carpet, jute and FAT MAT sound deadener separated!
    Then ran into more problems getting out the toe boards and trans cover!! What were they thinking?

    Anyway, what I found is, with the pedal on the floor, the TO bearing is still not in contact with the PP fingers. If you can see in the pic, the fingers look like they’re already depressed!
    is this a condition of a simple pedal adjustment, or the PP installed incorrectly? Disc has the flat side toward the flywheel.
    Hoping NOT to have to pull trans, but it is what it is!
    Any experienced suggestions? Advice?
    Thanks, guys!!

    TO bearing not touching fingers with pedal depressed to the floor
    IMG_3958.jpeg

    Installed view
    IMG_3645.jpeg

    Out of adjustment on linkage
    IMG_3959.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2024
  10. Tickety Boo
    Joined: Feb 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,765

    Tickety Boo
    Member
    from Wisconsin

    Did you use the special pilot bearing for small block Chevy to early Ford input shaft.
     
    hotrodA likes this.
  11. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,348

    alchemy
    Member

    Can’t tell from your pics but the arms look the same depth without the trans as through the small window. Could you still need to adjust the length of the throwout connecting rod?
     
  12. Thanks for the quick replies!

    Yes. New from Speedway. Trans slid into place without resistance.

    Yes they do, don’t they. Thought there might be some blocks in the PP holding it depressed but did’t see any. No notices for that came with the clutch.
    Out of threads on the linkage rod. Already adjusted out to end of threads. Added a pic.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2024
    Tickety Boo likes this.
  13. What do you mean you’re out of adjustment? Do you need to extend the rod or shorten it? If you need to extend the rod, get one of those threaded couplers and a little all thread, and put the clevis on and see if you can get the pressure plate to release. A trip to the hardware store in a couple of bucks should do that.

    If that’s the case you can then fix it properly

    I feel like this is a linkage issue.
     
    bchctybob likes this.
  14. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,348

    alchemy
    Member

    Seems like the linkage has been modified from stock. Is there a notch cut out of the frame? And I don’t think it should almost rub the top of the access hole.

    Get a longer rod?
     
    Dan Hay likes this.
  15. Thanks! I’m in agreement.

    @alchemy That clevis is barely missing the edge of the cutout, which hasn’t been altered.
    I completely removed it earlier to check the eye for wear. Looked perfect after a wire brushing.

    @Dan Hay Need to extend it. Lengthening the rod is easy. I’ll try that first.
    Thanks for the interest, guys!
     
    Dan Hay likes this.
  16. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,048

    Budget36
    Member

    I may be off base, but Chevy has 2 or 3 TO bearings, maybe you need the longer one?
     
  17. el Scotto
    Joined: Mar 3, 2004
    Posts: 4,722

    el Scotto
    Member
    from Tracy, CA

    On my 1948 Mercury I did this to I had to lengthen the rod.

    I even took a picture of it!

    IMG_3080.JPG
     
    bchctybob likes this.
  18. @Budget36 This setup supposedly keeps the early Ford TO bearing and carrier.

    @el Scotto Agreed! That’s easy enough!

    I’ll try to get it adjusted to make contact and check for release first. I rechecked and found that I have about 1/4” of threads still. Will see if that’s enough.
    Then correct the rod.

    Thanks for the replies!!
     
  19. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,497

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    In your first picture it appears you are using the early Ford TO bearing and hub. A few guys that bought my T5 kit have insisted on using the Borg & Beck 3 finger pressure plate. The large early bearing does not seem to work well, it was designed to work with the Long 3 finger PP. They have changed to the Merc TO Bearing which is held on the clutch fork with spring loaded fingers. I'm sure I will be poo pooed but that's what I did.
     
  20. Duke
    Joined: Mar 21, 2001
    Posts: 927

    Duke
    Member

    I had the same problem. I am not running yet, but it seems to work. I extended the linkage rod. When my pedal is fully up there is tension on the spring.
    IMG_3258.jpeg IMG_3259.jpeg
     
  21. @krylon32 Gary, the guys presumably used the TO bearing corresponding to the pressure plate: 49-50 and early 51 Merc?
    Do you know if it looks like this? Thanks!
    IMG_2974.jpg

    @Duke Thanks for the pics. That looks like my solution.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2024
  22. Duke
    Joined: Mar 21, 2001
    Posts: 927

    Duke
    Member

    That bearing would likely help if it is thicker. The Mercury transmission has the same input shaft as the Ford. When I found my issue I found old posts on here where others have the same issue.
     
  23. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,497

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska
    1. Central Nebraska H.A.M.B.

    hotrodA: That is the bearing.
     
  24. Thanks to all!!
     
  25. Duke
    Joined: Mar 21, 2001
    Posts: 927

    Duke
    Member

    @hotrodA if you get the Merc bearing can you do a comparison of the size to the Ford? Not that I want to pull my motor to change it.
     
  26. If I remember correctly, pretty sure I used a Ford throwout bearing with the Merc pressure plate. I didn't have to do any lengthening of the linkage, this was on a 1940.
     
    lilCowboy and deucemac like this.
  27. @Dan Hay and @Duke
    Yep, I’m hoping that the adjustment, if there are enough threads, will take care of it.
    I’m a lifetime member of the KISS club.
    If I can get a Merc TO bearing to compare, I’ll report my findings.
    If I end up having to pull the trans I’ll put it in.
    What I can’t get a grip on is the difference in the adjustment needed going from the Long style Ford flathead pressure plate and the Borg and Beck “replacement” pressure plate.
    My 40 linkage looks totally stock, and that makes it more confusing.
     
    Dan Hay likes this.
  28. After getting some more, but not enough, adjustment for the TO bearing to the PP fingers I pulled all the linkage out.

    1.The threaded adjuster rod is only 4” long over all. Might work for stock 40, but not this.
    2. The eye was worn oval, as well as the pin.

    I ordered a new 5” long rod and correct return spring pin from ThirdGen which should make it happen.
    When I get it installed I’ll report.
    Thanks to all who replied! I appreciate your help.
    Bill
     
    Last edited: Apr 4, 2024
    kadillackid, Budget36 and Dan Hay like this.
  29. Good on ya changing the worn pin and eye. The linkage is pretty sensitive to adjustment. Two turns of the linkage is a lot so worn components can complicate things.
     
  30. Yep. That extra length on the rod should allow for plenty of adjustment. Thanks for your advice.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.