Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical SBC Oil level from bottom of block?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by McMac 31, May 5, 2024.

  1. McMac 31
    Joined: Dec 25, 2022
    Posts: 55

    McMac 31
    Member
    from Western PA

    I have researched a good bit and understand that the small block Chevy is 5 Qt (or 5.1) for the 350, but this is with a stock pan and stock dipstick.


    My issue is that I have an unmarked pan and a Mr Gasket aftermarket dip stick reading well over full after 3.5 Qts and this can’t be right.


    Does anyone know 100% what the oil max height distance should be in comparison to the bottom of the block where the oil pan bolts up? I’ve seen a few answers but I’m hoping someone here knows the true answer.


    It’s a 73’ Camaro block and I need to do the 2pc rear main and the pan gasket anyway so I can mark the dipstick where the oil max should be and use the standard distance on there now to make a new minimum line as well.


    This looks like a speedway or other brand aluminum cover but the bottom portion is slanted for better draining and the new finned aluminum models I see around look parallel to the block without this ‘drain taper’. I don’t want to do any damage running it overfilled (like wiping out bearings).

    Thank you for the help!
     

    Attached Files:

    GlassThamesDoug likes this.
  2. Balljoint
    Joined: Dec 3, 2021
    Posts: 221

    Balljoint
    Member

    I can’t help you with the dimension but if the engine originally took 5 quarts I can’t imagine you’d want to run too much less than that. I’d be slightly concerned with only 3,5 quarts, especially for any lengthy drive.
    Is it possible there’s a windage tray holding oil and marking the dipstick? Can you take some measurements on the pan height (top rail to bottom) and compare it to a stock pan?
     
    clem likes this.
  3. fastcar1953
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,080

    fastcar1953
    Member

    If it's empty and you know it needs 5 qrts then mark dipstick where ever it is. The pan is not that far off from stock.
    I would ditch the aluminum pan. They crack and the only one I bought and used leaked. Never could get it to seal.
    Steel pans dent. Less chance of ruining motor.
     
  4. fastcar1953
    Joined: Oct 23, 2009
    Posts: 4,080

    fastcar1953
    Member

    Love the car .
     
  5. I've never seen a slanted one like that, I ran a CalCustom aluminum pan with a flat bottom like a stock pan on my t-bucket for several yrs, it was a standard 5 qt capacity.
    I plan on running this one I picked up on my 57 p/u.

    20230903_165109.jpg 20230903_161645.jpg
     
    bchctybob likes this.
  6. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,444

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    ^^^^This^^^^
     
  7. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,460

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    It would be best to drop oil pan to see pick up how fair off bottom of sump ,& if baffled,
    Should be 1/4 to 1/2 inch off bottom of sump ,or look threw drain hole ...
    5 qt pan sump depth is 7- 1/4 7- 3/4 from bottom of block ( typically)
    I would say that pan is 5 - 6 qt with filter , a xtra quart would be about 1/4 inch ,fill with 6 , let it set for few mints then mark your stick cold ,,,
    Most important is pick up to bottom of pan ,
    IMG_1536.jpeg
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2024
  8. JD Miller
    Joined: Nov 12, 2011
    Posts: 2,628

    JD Miller
    Member

    To me, that looks like a bad idea and bad design. What the heck?
    That just creates several problems. Chevy engineers are shaking the heads:eek::D
    [​IMG]
     
    mad mikey likes this.
  9. I have gone through this several times and the only sure-fire way is to drain and refill the pan with the amount of oil in the manual, then re-mark the dipstick. If you have good oil pressure at , say 2000 RPM, then all should be good.
    Any fluctuations at higher RPM could be the pickup sucking a bit of air and the location may have to be lowered so it is closer to the lowest point in the pan.
     
  10. jimmy six
    Joined: Mar 21, 2006
    Posts: 16,734

    jimmy six
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You really need to know where the pick up is located to the bottom of the pan. With that slant/angle if it’s a stock one I’ll bet it’s not near where it needs to be like said above 1/4-1/2” off the bottom.
     
    mad mikey, buffaloracer and clem like this.
  11. 19Eddy30
    Joined: Mar 27, 2011
    Posts: 3,460

    19Eddy30
    Member
    from VA

    Op need to know how far pick up / location ,,, if wrong pick up , Service manual says 5 quarts & typical OEM small blocks chevy is 5 quarts and the pick up is only a 1/4 of inch in the
    ""Oil "" it will starve the motor, run back not fast enough thats why in pretty much stock configuration a 1/4 - 1/2 off bottom of pan ,,, Stock SBC the baffle in pan is 3-- to 3-1/2 inch's off bottom of Sump ,
     
    mad mikey and clem like this.
  12. sfowler
    Joined: Sep 14, 2011
    Posts: 76

    sfowler
    Member

    Lots of numbers came in but i didn,t see any offered about oil level in reguard to block bottom or more importantly the spinning crank shaft . i,m sure some space is definatly required reguardless of oil pan depth . Hope you get your answer from a chevy expert .
     
  13. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,041

    Budget36
    Member

    Well, I have a pan off a 1pc RMS SBC. I’m changing the oil in my truck on Tuesday, it takes 6 quarts So I have to buy a jug and a quart.
    If you don’t get an answer by Tuesday mid afternoon (California time) PM me and I’ll use the empty quart bottle, and fill 5 quarts in it and get some sump/pan measurements.

    Edit: Thinking about it further, the oil is probably a small distance from the bottom of your “slant” in the front of the pan. The slant is to let it drain to the sump.
    You wouldn’t want it on the slant or stopping quickly etc, would splash oil on the crank.
    Racers, road racers, etc use a windage tray to keep that from happening.
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2024
  14. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 11,064

    BJR
    Member

    If you or anyone else has a stock pan, off the engine and can fill it with 5 qts of oil then measure the level from the top with the rails level you will have your answer.
     
    mad mikey, X-cpe and firstinsteele like this.
  15. BamaMav
    Joined: Jun 19, 2011
    Posts: 6,969

    BamaMav
    Member Emeritus
    from Berry, AL

    I would measure the depth the crank counterweights drop below the bottom of the block and use that as a starting measurement. I would think you’d want a minimum couple of inches below that at maximum fill, maybe more. If running a windage tray you could get by with a little more fill height. Since it wasn’t designed as a splash engine, I wouldn’t want the crank splashing the pan every turn.

    As to capacity, it’s usually measured by pan size and filter, 4 quarts in pan, one in filter. Not all filters will hold a quart, so any over what it takes to fill the filter is added to the pan volume. Put that close guess in the not installed pan, mark the distance for the fluid level then measure to the flange, then subtract the number you got from measuring the crank throws, that figure will be your clearance. You might find you can even add another quart without interference.
    Like was stated above, mark dipstick accordingly. Also make sure oil pickup is within 1/4” of the bottom of the pan.
     
    jaracer, RodStRace and finn like this.
  16. 2OLD2FAST
    Joined: Feb 3, 2010
    Posts: 5,996

    2OLD2FAST
    Member
    from illinois

    5 quarts in a stock sbc pan would be a quart overfull !
     
    427 sleeper, jimmy six and BJR like this.
  17. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 11,064

    BJR
    Member

    I was just going by what was posted before my post. Thanks for the correction.
     
  18. finn
    Joined: Jan 25, 2006
    Posts: 1,444

    finn
    Member

    You don’t want the crank counterweights or rod bolts dipping when the engine is at whatever installed angle is plus maybe another 20 or thirty degrees to account for parking on an extreme slope.
     
    GlassThamesDoug likes this.
  19. MCjim
    Joined: Jun 4, 2006
    Posts: 1,353

    MCjim
    Member
    from soCal

    Hell, just dump four quarts of water in, less mess and waste.
     
    jimmy six likes this.
  20. Did you measure your dipstick against another sbc dipstick to make sure the length is correct ?
     
    mad mikey and Desoto291Hemi like this.
  21. GordonC
    Joined: Mar 6, 2006
    Posts: 3,456

    GordonC
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Reminds me of the time I was replacing an off topic engine and my brother was helping. We pulled the old motor and put in the newer one. He was moving stuff over from the old one to the new one and took the dipstick from the old motor while I was buttoning up other stuff. He then proceeds to put oil in it until it hits the full mark on the dipstick. Well, on fire up it is smoking like I am fogging for mosquitos. Couldn't figure out why and thought the newer engine I had picked up was toast. Turns out he had put over 7 quarts of oil into the engine to get it to full on the dipstick!. I had pulled the carb and could see oil laying on the intake runners of the manifold. So I questioned what he had done and figured it out. So I guess the lesson is, if you KNOW it only takes 5 quarts, (with new filter?) then put 5 in it and ignore what the dipstick says, or make a new mark where full would be.
     
  22. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 11,064

    BJR
    Member

    That works unless you put on an aftermarket aluminum pan that may hold a lot more oil. Which is the OP's problem.
     
    05snopro440 likes this.
  23. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,414

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    All that need be done here is to measure a stock setup.

    Post the distance from the pan rail to the add line, and to the full line.

    Nothing else matters.

    Increased capacity oil pans add volume down, out, or both, not UP!

    Yes, the pickup depth needs to be correct, but that is a separate issue from where the top of the oil is.
     
  24. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,414

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    All other issues aside, the OP is better off with a flat bottom stock depth pan.

    In this case, preferably steel.

    This one is in the strike zone.
     
  25. 2OLD2FAST
    Joined: Feb 3, 2010
    Posts: 5,996

    2OLD2FAST
    Member
    from illinois

    How does oil get from the pan to the intake runners?
     
  26. GordonC
    Joined: Mar 6, 2006
    Posts: 3,456

    GordonC
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Not certain. Only thing I could come up with was a vacuum line which ran from the valve cover to a plate under the carb was sucking in some of the excess oil when it was running. Only way I could figure it could get to the intake.
     
  27. Oneball
    Joined: Jul 30, 2023
    Posts: 1,494

    Oneball
    Member

    Through the breather system, when you overfill an engine massively the whole crankcase becomes one big oilly splashy mist and the breather pumps out oil into the intake.
     
    Last edited: May 6, 2024
    GordonC likes this.
  28. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,693

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    The pickup location in relevance to the bottom of the pan doesn't determine oil fill depth. Oil fill depth is determined by level in relationship to the crank counterweights. Needs to be low enough for the counterweights not to slap the oil, but not so low as to lose oiling if you're cornering hard.
    I can't see anything about the aluminum pan that would make me think it hold much different from a stock pan. That's 4 qts., plus one for the filter, unless it's a small oil filter that only uses 1/2 qt.
    I'd run the engine to ensure the filter is full. Then drain the oil and measure out 4 qts. poured in. Let it drain down well, then push the dipstick in and make a mark at wherever the oil is on the new dipstick.
     
    RodStRace likes this.
  29. I used a Ratio-Rite cup , (we used to race motocross) ,,and measured out exactly 4 quarts in an old windshield washer jug .
    I marked each quart level on that jug,,,,and had 4 graduated lines .
    I never used it for a SBC,,,but I checked my DeSoto pan .
    The level for 5 quarts was exactly 4.5 inches below the pan rail,,,,,with the pan sitting at approximately the same level as installed in a vehicle.
    That is approximately 2 inches below the crank counterweights,,,and well below my windage tray studs .
    I’m anticipating running 6 quarts in the pan and 1 in the filter,,,plenty of room there for the oil to clear everything .

    Tommy
     
  30. I took the original dipstick & tube off a stock engine and used them for the initial fill on my last couple engines. Then used that level to mark the aftermarket dipsticks I was using. Seemed logical to me.

    The way that aluminum pan slants so low at the back edge looks like an invitation to catch the drain plug on something.
     
    ekimneirbo, RodStRace and McMac 31 like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.