Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Mid Life Crisis 62 Vette

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by squirrel, May 12, 2023.

  1. Sharpone
    Joined: Jul 25, 2022
    Posts: 1,450

    Sharpone
    Member

    If the intake manifold is dry and only the intake ports on the head is oily, it has to be the mating surface IMHO. Has anyone ever doubled up the intake gaskets? I know that doubling the gaskets might cause port misalignment but this might be a cheap and easy way to determine if the mating surfaces are the cause. IIRC way back in the day when guys angle milled heads I think they used 2 gaskets to a side.
    Dan
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2024
    porkshop likes this.
  2. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 5,847

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    "If you go back several pages you’ll see the new heads and aluminum intake unpainted on the engine. The fit looks spot on."
    Looks good from on top & on ends, but you can't see the bottom of the ports & valley & that's where it would not be sealing ...............................
     
    porkshop, X-cpe, Thor1 and 1 other person like this.
  3. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 5,847

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    The intake manifold ports would naturally be dry, sucking oil from valley would go straight to head port where the vacuum is the strongest.
     
    porkshop, Thor1, Johnboy34 and 2 others like this.
  4. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 5,847

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    porkshop likes this.
  5. 427 sleeper
    Joined: Mar 8, 2017
    Posts: 3,172

    427 sleeper
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Jim, have you considered just swapping back to the original cast iron intake manifold to rule out the porosity issues with the aluminum one? It might not run worth a damn with the heads and cam change, but it would run good enough to see if that was the problem.
     
    warbird1, porkshop, X-cpe and 2 others like this.
  6. AmishMike
    Joined: Mar 27, 2014
    Posts: 1,138

    AmishMike
    Member

    Went back reading Friday posts but not clear if all plugs oily & all head intake ports oily or only a few. Has to be problem fit between new heads & intake not just gaskets. Try a new ( different ) intake manifold. If head was off & intake off, prop them up & bolt together see if any gap on underside but not the same as manifold wedged between two heads. Strange problem & pain in butt
     
    porkshop and Sharpone like this.
  7. tomcat11
    Joined: Mar 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,001

    tomcat11
    Member

    Post 1646.

    How about the Valve Guide Seals.
     
    porkshop and BJR like this.
  8. If the intake valve guides and seals are badly worn I'd expect the problem to show up as intermittent valve train noise. Or maybe blue smoke out the tailpipe after prolonged idling or during closed throttle de-acceleration while still in gear.
     
    porkshop likes this.
  9. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 5,847

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    Have you ruled out aluminum intake manifold interference to soup can? You have the shortest can they make but it's worth a look.
     
    porkshop, 26 T Ford RPU and Baumi like this.
  10. I have hade that issue with a low Edelbrock Streetmaster. JW
     
    porkshop and brigrat like this.
  11. snoc653
    Joined: Dec 25, 2023
    Posts: 539

    snoc653
    Member
    from Iowa

    The question is where is the oil coming into the heads from. Even if the mating surfaces of the heads and intake were off, there should be some evidence as to the seal being off. If the oil was pooling in the heads and washing down past the valve seals I could see it. But I wouldn’t think just bad seals would cause that kind of consumption. Maybe pull a head and set it with the rocker valley level. Fill the valley and see if you can see where it leaks through. Might cycle the valves if you have the tool to do it manually.
     
  12. Chief 64
    Joined: Dec 10, 2010
    Posts: 263

    Chief 64
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    If it’s the intake gasket letting vacuum suck the oil into the head, does it get worse if you stuff a rag down the oil fill breather cap tube? (I believe I read the pcv is already plugged )Or can you feel vacuum at the oil fill tube with your hand?
     
    porkshop likes this.
  13. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,628

    Paul
    Editor

    the machined surface around the head ports looks quite slick, maybe too slick to seal without some kind of sealant.
    I would clean all gasket surfaces with lacquer thinner and use a non hardening gasket compound like Permatex 2 on both sides of the new gaskets, toss the end gaskets and apply a nice bead of RTV Black silicone in their place. (looks like that is what you did there)
     
    porkshop likes this.
  14. If you're still considering some porosity in the underside of the intake manifold, would this maybe tell you anything?

    Invert the manifold and remove the heat shield under the carb. Clean the hell out of it and paint the underside with some form of Glyptal. At least if the porosity was near the outboard intake ports it might explain why the oil only shows up in the cylinder heads.

    Yeah, I'm just grabbing at straws here . . . o_O
     
    porkshop likes this.
  15. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,424

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yes, I thought about that, it's one thing I can do pretty easily.

    The intake a factory 1962 340 HP 327 intake, it clears the can just fine. The heat shield from the 250 hp intake fits this 340hp intake. There's no soup can interference.

    I just did this yesterday, no help.


    Thanks for all the suggestions!
     
    WC145, porkshop, Paul and 4 others like this.
  16. noboD
    Joined: Jan 29, 2004
    Posts: 8,636

    noboD
    Member

    Wasn't there a "stump Squirrel" thread a few years back? I think Squirrel just did it.
     
    WC145, porkshop, Glenn S and 5 others like this.
  17. X-cpe
    Joined: Mar 9, 2018
    Posts: 2,086

    X-cpe

    Some ideas for quick checks.
    For mounting surface angles, bolt cleaned manifold to cleaned head with out a gasket. Check for even gap across the ends.
    For a warped manifold:
    (1) Bolt manifold to a head on the bench and use a feeler gauge to check for gaps at bottom of ports.
    (2) Coat mounting surface with marker
    On a hard flat surface, place stickit file paper (220?), or discs with opposite sides cut straight, in an area large enough to accommodate the manifold.
    Carefully hold the manifold flat on the abrasive and work it back and forth several times.
    This will also tell you how flat the mounting surfaces are.
     
    Sharpone, SS327, AmishMike and 2 others like this.
  18. tomcat11
    Joined: Mar 31, 2010
    Posts: 1,001

    tomcat11
    Member

    Well, what's the verdict?
     
    41 GMC K-18 and Sharpone like this.
  19. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 5,529

    RodStRace
    Member

  20. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,424

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It actually looks like it's sealed up now...no oil in the intake, the gaskets looked good.

    But there were some other reasons I wanted to take it apart again...one was the main bearings, the other is that the performance is not quite what I hoped...I think I will be happier with a smaller cam. I'm thinking about swapping the valve springs, and maybe finding a different intake, and planning to do some tinkering with the carb.

    Mean while, I'm replacing the main bearings, which I noticed were kind of rough looking when I had the engine out last time. I had got new bearings for it, but they were the wrong ones, so this time I have the right ones, and am replacing them. Oil pressure would get pretty low when it was hot, like 30 psi at 3000 rpm.

    I'm going to put the flat tappet cam and original heads and intake back on it for now.

    Another thing is that it's been getting pretty bad mileage with the new stuff, it was getting around 18 before, now around 12...and this trip I'm taking isn't going to require the car to be quick, just make a long drive and be able to race every day (1/8th mile).

    So expect more changes as time goes on.
     
    brEad, warbird1, Thor1 and 11 others like this.
  21. snoc653
    Joined: Dec 25, 2023
    Posts: 539

    snoc653
    Member
    from Iowa

    What intake are you wanting to run?
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  22. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,424

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Not sure yet....
     
    41 GMC K-18 and Sharpone like this.
  23. snoc653
    Joined: Dec 25, 2023
    Posts: 539

    snoc653
    Member
    from Iowa

    I have a performer that was on a 350 I bought to build for a boat. If you’re not looking to really rev that high, they work pretty well. I’m probably putting something a little more vintage on the boat. It was cast in 98.
     
    Sharpone and 41 GMC K-18 like this.
  24. patman
    Joined: Apr 30, 2007
    Posts: 600

    patman
    Member

    Sharpone likes this.
  25. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,424

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It has baffling....

    Anyways, I pulled the engine, put the flat tappet hydraulic cam back in, as well as the power pack heads and iron intake and WCFB. It is back to it's old self, for now.

    I'm considering changing the valve springs in the Trick Flow heads, and putting them on later this fall. And playing with different intakes and carbs.

    I welded an O2 sensor bung on the pipe while the engine was out, so I can check the mixture. I think the AFB was running kind of rich, although I put stock size jets/rods in it.
     
    brEad, porkshop, warbird1 and 7 others like this.
  26. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 5,847

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    Can you tell us what O2 sensor and gauge (kit?) you installed?
     
    porkshop and Sharpone like this.
  27. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,424

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I just put the bung in the pipe, haven't screwed in a sensor or plugged it into anything yet. I was planning to just put in the temporary setup, which is a very old Innovate LM-1 handheld system, it plugs into a cigarette lighter, and the wideband sensor, and displays AFR or lambda on an LCD display.

    lm1.jpg
     
    brEad, porkshop, warbird1 and 5 others like this.
  28. saltflats
    Joined: Aug 14, 2007
    Posts: 12,871

    saltflats
    Member
    from Missouri

    I like it, looks basic.
    The Ededlbrock carburetors seemed to rich out of the box for me. The one thing is getting the idle with no ported vacuum signal at that port. If your lucky it's only a metering rod change.
     
    porkshop and RodStRace like this.
  29. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 5,847

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    I think all Eddy's run rich out of the box, they don't want you leaning out and have to buy you a motor!
     
    porkshop and RodStRace like this.
  30. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 5,847

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

     
    porkshop and RodStRace like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.