Register now to get rid of these ads!

Corvair IFS Ideas

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by 32 Confederate, Jun 22, 2025.

  1. 32 Confederate
    Joined: Jan 28, 2024
    Posts: 10

    32 Confederate

    I am working on setting up a Corvair IFS for my street rod project here is the Idea list thus far:
    conversion of corvair hubs for 32.... Machine OD of hubs to accept S10 4x4 rotors
    replace 7/16" x 20 / 0.472 Knurl wheel studs with S10 4x4 M12 X 1.5 /0.501 Knurl
    Replace wheel bearings and races
    design caliper mounting backplate for either S10 4x4 dual piston calipers or
    Speedway Metric calipers with oversize pistons
    https://www.speedwaymotors.com/2-3-4-Inch-Big-Bore-1978-88-GM-Metric-Brake- Caliper,25158.html

    My question is, has anyone done a rear mounted rack and pinion conversion on one of these and if so, would you share specific details on how to best do it to avoid bump steer?
     
  2. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 11,044

    BJR
    Member

    Why?
     
    Deuces and 49ratfink like this.
  3. 32 Confederate
    Joined: Jan 28, 2024
    Posts: 10

    32 Confederate

    Wanting to do something different and keep it as much Chevrolet as I can.... Dad was a dealer mechanic in the late 50's until the mid 60's... I already have a rebuildable corvair IFS, but someone put a front mounted R&P on it that would interfere with the front splash apron and was not well thought out...
     
  4. 32 Confederate
    Joined: Jan 28, 2024
    Posts: 10

    32 Confederate

    Another reason being that it will make repair parts more available as my son and I have several S10's and then I could basically get all of the parts for a brake job under a single vehicle reference that would be readily available at most parts stores when on a trip.
     
  5. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 7,665

    RodStRace
    Member

    To expand a bit on the question @BJR asked, why?
    Negatives
    It's an old design for a rear engine car.
    It was done to rods back in the 60s, but had fallen out of favor a decade later.
    It requires a lot of work and modification.
    I would imagine that there are a lot of more refined, modern designs that have better geometry, easier parts availability and easier installation. Even if you limit it to GM offerings, the obvious answer is Corvette upper/lower arms and spindles for 5 generations, along with various other platforms. You just mentioned S10. Why not use those parts?
    https://autoctrls.com/wp-content/img/chevy-s10-front-suspension-diagram-dxv.jpg

    Positives
    Different - not really. As said, it was done back in the day.
    It sounds like what you are working on already has it, but poorly done. Fixing may be less work that replacement, but that's your call.
     
    BJR likes this.
  6. 32 Confederate
    Joined: Jan 28, 2024
    Posts: 10

    32 Confederate

    All very good points..... I am working on a limited budget as we all are.... it also is one of the few designs that will allow the front fenders to remain in their original configuration. I thoroughly appreciate your insight and opinion.... I am still in the planning phase and believe that the M2 took over dominance in the market due to the demise of the corvair due to Nader's raiders and thus the limitation on parts....
     
    SS327 likes this.
  7. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 7,665

    RodStRace
    Member

    Hey, I appreciate that it was taken in the mindset it was written. We all have budgets to work within too!
    While the MII has become the basis for most modern stuff, it's also pretty old.
    I'm no engineer or CAD/CAM guy who can model the parts and compare, so I can't guide you with valid points on a better choice. Darn near everything built in the past 20 years is heavier than most rods are, so I wouldn't even know which are a good starting point. I'd want to avoid any strut, multi-link and one-off (expensive, hard to find) stuff, but it also comes down to adapting to the typical C channel or box frame rail and as you said, cost. Add in packaging for early fenders you mentioned and it's the needle in the haystack.
    If the Corvair fits, works, and will be cheaper and easier than others, go for it.
     
    32 Confederate likes this.
  8. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 11,044

    BJR
    Member

    I had an Olds powered 34 Ford back in the late 60's that someone had put a Vair front end in. It understeered something awful. If you went around a corner fast the front tires would slide. Replaced it with a stock Henry front suspension and all was good.
     
    49ratfink and 32 Confederate like this.
  9. I drove a full fendered 31 Ford Victoria for many years, over 140k miles, with the 2nd generation Corvair front crossmember, suspension and brakes.
    As noted the front steer rack interferes with the splash apron.
    At about 40k miles I converted it to rear steer, to improve the front end appearance.
    The conversion was not difficult.
    I used an Omni K-car rack. I swapped the bolt on steering arms, from side to side. The steering radius was too large, so I was able to get the performance, shortened steering arms. That helped a lot.
    I also swapped the wheel cylinders, side to side, so the brake line pointed to the rear.

    I never had a problem with the adequacy of the drum brakes. Tire wear was never a problem. Bump steer was never a problem

    I had to replace the brake shoes once while in Vermont ( I live near Chicago), in the early 2000's. Stopped at the NAPA store. He asked if I wanted the cheap ones or the better ones. He had both in stock, no one stock anything these days.

    Corvair parts are still available from Clark's Corvair in Manchester, NH.
    https://ssl.corvair.com/user-cgi/main

    I hope this helps.
     
    leon bee, 49ratfink, vtx1800 and 4 others like this.
  10. TrailerTrashToo
    Joined: Jun 20, 2018
    Posts: 1,403

    TrailerTrashToo
    Member

    Quick correction:
    "Clark's Corvair Parts, Inc.
    400 Mohawk Trail Shelburne Falls, MA 01370 USA"
     
    leon bee, 32 Confederate and pprather like this.
  11. 32 Confederate
    Joined: Jan 28, 2024
    Posts: 10

    32 Confederate

    Thank You! Saving these items to my notes! As far as brake upgrade is concerned, I will be contacting these people for caliper mounting plates to adapt the metric calipers and s10 4x4 rotors: https://www.levairperformance.com/mechanical-and-engine
     
    leon bee likes this.
  12. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 5,156

    ekimneirbo
    Member
    from Brooks Ky

    I love to see people use their ideas and skills to adapt things. I'm building a 32 as well and it will have independent front suspension. I plan to run fenders, so its important that whatever is used fits into the space under the fenders without having to modify them. I'm also in the process of building a 49 Chevy pickup which I have added a Corvette suspension to, so I'm aware of some of the issues that come up when trying to adapt independent suspension. There is plenty of fender room on the truck, but it was still a time consuming task to get some of the components to work, and I had to buy some things like the swaybar components and cobble stuff together.

    When I decided my 32 would incorporate independent front suspension, I did a lot of comparing. I not only compared prices but features. Heidt's seemed to be the most well known, but the price was higher, it didn't come with a sway bar ($400 option) and shipping was quite a bit higher. To make a long story short, I went with a TCI from Pete and Jakes. It came with the sway bar standard and its price was cheaper than Heidts. Shipping was also several hundred dollars cheaper. TCI is a well known company.

    I would suggest just making a goal to save up the money till you can purchase something similar as you will get into a lot of unexpected issues trying to make the Corvair fit. Not saying its not possible, but there isn't much room there to make it fit and operate properly and still make it look right when done. I have lots of machining and fabricating experience, and I would not attempt that particular conversion. This is not meant to criticize, but to give you an honest opinion about attempting that.

    Here are some pics I took of how finished 32 independent suspensions look. Maybe they will help you decide.

    32 Ford Suspension 3aa.JPG

    32 Ford Suspension 5aa.JPG

    32 Ford Suspension 7aa.JPG

    32 Ford Suspension 9aa.JPG

    32 Ford Suspension 15aa.JPG

    32 Ford Suspension 16aa.JPG

    32 Ford Suspension 18aa.JPG

    32 Ford Suspension 12aa.JPG 32 Ford Suspension 34aa.jpg

    32 Ford Suspension 33aa.jpg

    32 Ford Suspension 31aa.jpg

    32 Ford Suspension 30aa.jpg 32 Ford Suspension 24aa.jpg

    This should provide you with some ability to compare how others have done it, and the close confines that it has to fit into. A friend said to me one day, that shiny parts are for those who show them and painted parts are for those who drive them............I got the painted stuff. Its cheaper too.:)

    One thing you might consider. If you are able to attend the Street Rod Nationals in Louisville Ky at the end of July, you can compare many of the suspensions as vendors have displays set up and often offer show discounts as well. Summit offers a 10% show discount on many other parts and its possible to offset much of the attendance costs. Also there will be hundreds if not more than a 1000 32s in the parking lot that you can see and talk to owners about their suspensions.
     
    Last edited: Jun 26, 2025
  13. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 7,665

    RodStRace
    Member

    Great post, @ekimneirbo . There really isn't much room on an early fendered car, let alone have it all be in proper orientation.
     
    ekimneirbo likes this.
  14. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 7,665

    RodStRace
    Member

  15. mustangsix
    Joined: Mar 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,522

    mustangsix
    Member

    How narrow does you front track need to be? An MGB has a bolt-on cross member and rack and pinion steering. The spindles use the same A6-A2 bearings as early mustangs and Camaros so you could use those hubs or a wilwood hub.
    But the track is pretty narrow, only about 51" hub to hub. They also have an integrated shock/ upper arm. That saves a little space but it's different.
    Rebuilding one only takes $20 of bushings.
     
    32 Confederate and Ned Ludd like this.
  16. Paladin1962
    Joined: Mar 10, 2025
    Posts: 102

    Paladin1962

    Can someone post a pic of a corvair front suspension unit? I think I have one that was used to rat up my '57 Morris. I saved it (so far, anyway) just in case someone wanted it. I'm just not sure it's actual corvair. The steering box looks like corvair....
     
  17. @In_The_Pink can you share a photo of your Corvair front before installation ?
     
  18. In_The_Pink
    Joined: Jan 9, 2010
    Posts: 960

    In_The_Pink
    Member

    *my ears ringing, a month later*

    Right here: https://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum...52-rambler-wagon.1291532/page-5#post-15121872

    I did a deep dive regarding setting up the steering with my LM (late model, '65+) Corvair front suspension-- Ackerman, etc., but it's a deep rabbit hole, and I have no room to mount the steering linkage components at the rear, so I didn't dive too deeply.

    I suppose like any classic vehicle, you can take it as far as you want, but I will add this: I did the "Blazer" front brake upgrade (basically adding bolt-on hubs, separate rotors, and dual piston front brake calipers) on my DD '98 Sonoma 2WD and I have zero regrets, so I would think it's be a great upgrade for an LM Corvair front suspension. I would probably go that route versus the Metric single piston calipers if both were similar in cost and complexity.

    Scarebird used to offer bolt on LM Corvair disc brake adapters, but I think they have been discontinued for a few years now. The Corvair forums have plenty of folks who have been down this road already, so it'd be worthwhile IMHO to visit there and spend some time searching and reading.
     
  19. larry k
    Joined: Feb 23, 2009
    Posts: 601

    larry k
    Member

    OH MAN , that car will handle just like a safe in a wheelbarrow !!!
     
    49ratfink likes this.
  20. Okie Pete
    Joined: Oct 29, 2008
    Posts: 5,912

    Okie Pete
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Put a straight axle under it and build a gasser
    Just ignore me . I’ve been in the sun all day
     
  21. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 7,665

    RodStRace
    Member

    Okie Pete likes this.
  22. 32 Confederate
    Joined: Jan 28, 2024
    Posts: 10

    32 Confederate

    You guys are GREAT! Still doing research as the job/commute/life, never allow the time I'd like to dedicate to the projects.... seem to have fallen behind on my chores around the house while I was down for 4 1/2 months for eye surgery on both eyes.... keep the ideas coming... I'm still kickin'!
     
  23. 42merc
    Joined: Dec 19, 2010
    Posts: 963

    42merc
    Member

    In the very early '70's I put 2nd gen Corvair fronts under a '34 Ford cpe & a little later an " A" delivery. Used front mounted Pinto R&P with shortened arms on both.
    Drove well, steered well.
    Worked for me.
    An after thought : Springs, got with the local GM parts guy and sourced a heavier Corvair spring, worked good with SBC engine weight.
     
    Last edited: Aug 4, 2025 at 1:39 PM
  24. 32 Confederate
    Joined: Jan 28, 2024
    Posts: 10

    32 Confederate

    So much for "OH MAN , that car will handle just like a safe in a wheelbarrow !!!"
     
  25. Dick Stevens
    Joined: Aug 7, 2012
    Posts: 4,032

    Dick Stevens
    Member

    If you don't have anything intelligent to add to the conversation, don't be a jackass and keep your snarky commnets to yourself!
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.