Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Sbc factory aluminum intake ID help

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Moriarity, Jul 27, 2025 at 8:35 AM.

  1. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 36,013

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    Ok guys any ideas on this? There is a 1/8 npt vacuum port on each pair of runners IMG_4969.jpeg IMG_4970.jpeg IMG_4971.jpeg IMG_4972.jpeg IMG_4973.jpeg IMG_4974.jpeg
     
    Deuces and Sharpone like this.
  2. Rumors are those are military.
    Maybe someone here knows why all the extra holes are there
     
  3. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,211

    squirrel
    Member

    the scant internet consensus is "marine". But military pops up also.

    No idea on the extra vacuum holes.
     
    mad mikey, Deuces, hrm2k and 2 others like this.
  4. Hey Mark, there was an old thread on these several years back where the unofficial decision was that they were military or possibly marine. Apparently the M114 was 283 powered and utilized some aluminum components according to someone on the tri-five Chevy forum who posted a picture of one of their engines.
     
  5. Here’s a military gm v8
    The extra holes by the thermostat housing are for picking it up
    There’s a vacuum line coming from the intake runner. Or looks like it under the other lines. IMG_7554.jpeg
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2025 at 9:06 AM
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,211

    squirrel
    Member

  7. Internet rumors are a date code located under the heat shield.
    Rumors
     
    mad mikey, deathrowdave and Sharpone like this.
  8. M114 info.
    Engine diagram shows the ports in the intake
    IMG_7555.jpeg
    not very good engine pic
    IMG_7556.jpeg
    But the 2 holes next to the water neck and extra bosses behind the carb can be seen with stuff bolted to it
     
  9. JD Miller
    Joined: Nov 12, 2011
    Posts: 2,629

    JD Miller
    Member

  10. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,581

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Not a rumor!
     
  11. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,288

    Fordors
    Member

    I bought two of these pumps years ago, they were also described as being from a military application. No snowflake so they weren’t cast by Winters, but can anyone shed any light on the origin? I’ve done some prep work for polishing, it showed having been sand cast.
    Two things in particular are different, the bypass hole on top is only 3/8-NPT and there are two 1/2-NPT (heater?) ports also.
    IMG_4288.jpeg
    IMG_4289.jpeg
    IMG_4291.jpeg IMG_4294.jpeg IMG_4295.jpeg
    Bill Jenkins said it was military in one of his books.
    IMG_4296.jpeg

    I just noticed another detail, the bypass hole to the No. 2 cylinder was blocked.
     
    Last edited: Jul 27, 2025 at 11:01 AM
  12. Sharpone
    Joined: Jul 25, 2022
    Posts: 2,385

    Sharpone
    Member

    I’m looking at the carburetor bolt pattern, What carb was used? Just curious.
    Dan
     
  13. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 36,013

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    Wcfb
     
    mad mikey, deathrowdave and Sharpone like this.
  14. Sharpone
    Joined: Jul 25, 2022
    Posts: 2,385

    Sharpone
    Member

    Thanks
     
  15. Johnny Gee
    Joined: Dec 3, 2009
    Posts: 14,036

    Johnny Gee
    Member
    from Downey, Ca

  16. brigrat
    Joined: Nov 9, 2007
    Posts: 6,020

    brigrat
    Member
    from Wa.St.

    Rumors are Steve Mc Queen was in the Marine Core, assigned to a tank, tried to hot rod the motor and it blew up, lost a stripe over the deal Did you find that tank and are adding to your collection?
     
    Last edited: Jul 29, 2025 at 2:04 PM
  17. rusty valley
    Joined: Oct 25, 2014
    Posts: 4,213

    rusty valley
    Member

    Same engine in the M116 husky, aluminum hull amphibious troop carrier. I had one back in the 80's missing lots of parts so I moved it on.
     
  18. Fordors
    Joined: Sep 22, 2016
    Posts: 6,288

    Fordors
    Member

    mad mikey, Joe Blow, Deuces and 3 others like this.
  19. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,539

    Beanscoot
    Member

    Too bad Gimpy no longer has access to the GM inside info.
     
    mad mikey, Deuces and Sharpone like this.
  20. redo32
    Joined: Jul 16, 2008
    Posts: 2,276

    redo32
    Member

    When I was a wee little lad in High School (class of '67) working at the Richfield station in town, there was a guy with a yellow chopped '32 5w with what was claimed to be an original '57 Vette 270HP motor. My Corvette buddy pointed out the twin towers on his heads and commented on how rare they were. I have seen little info on the internet to corroborate.
     
  21. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,840

    Paul
    Editor

    interesting
    and not all runners have them,
    only every other in firing order.

    must be to run multiple bells and whistles
     
    mad mikey, Moriarity and Sharpone like this.
  22. Joe Blow
    Joined: Oct 29, 2016
    Posts: 1,620

    Joe Blow
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Last edited: Jul 27, 2025 at 6:41 PM
    mad mikey, Deuces, deuceman32 and 6 others like this.
  23. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,977

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    I've had more than one swap meet seller insist that because this intake is aluminum, it just HAS to be from an early Corvette.
     
  24. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,918

    carbking
    Member

    I would be interested in exactly which carburetor was used for my records.

    According to the Carter master carburetor index, no WCFB was ever sold to Chevrolet specifically for a 283 military engine.

    The contract for the M114 was signed in 1961.

    Carter had a couple of WCFB's around that time with 283 applications: 2818s (S/T) and 3059s (A/T).

    The index also listed number 3058s which was assigned Chevrolet part number 3796894. There is no record in the Carter index this carb was produced, nor is there an application suggested. There are no catalog pages, and if a TFN exists, I don't have it.

    Of course, there were also the dual quad WCFB's but I didn't list them.

    Anyone have a copy of the military TM for the M114? Reprints are available on ebay, but I really don't need another book just to get a single part number.

    Jon
     
    mad mikey, Sharpone and Deuces like this.
  25. This came up in a military site for a part number
    IMG_7573.jpeg
    Guy was asking what carb for a 1965 m114
    One place list a teapot carb. I think that PN comes up one of those

    kinda looks like one in the previous pics posted
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2025 at 2:50 PM
    mad mikey and Sharpone like this.
  26. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,918

    carbking
    Member

    Thank you Anthony.

    That makes a lot of sense. While the haystack Holley seems to be almost universally despised on this forum; the military used quite a few of them due to their reliability.

    Unfortunately, Holley does not list most of their military carbs in their master index; and the last military Holley TM to my knowledge was printed in 1953 ?

    Just thinking out loud, I don't remember a haystack Holley with the rectangular bolt pattern; they were the early 3 3/4 x 3 7/8 (almost square).

    Jon
     
  27. Moriarity
    Joined: Apr 11, 2001
    Posts: 36,013

    Moriarity
    SUPER MODERATOR
    Staff Member

    bolt pattern on the manifold is 4 1/4” wide by 5 5/8 center to center
     
  28. carbking
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 3,918

    carbking
    Member

    Thank you Mark.

    After further review, to quote a sports cliche, I have a listing in my database for a haystack Holley type 2140-SG, list number R-1960-1. superseded by R-1960-2A for the Chevrolet military 283. The Chevrolet number is 3823489, which agrees with the post by Anthony.

    For those not familiar with the "SG" suffix, it meant "with governer".

    EDIT: and after even more review (my records show I fabricated several kits for these about 25 years ago), the R-1960 (both the 1A, and the 2A) use flange mounting gasket 8R-634 with is the thicker version of the 3 3/4 by 3 7/8 bolt pattern.

    I wonder if an adapter plate was bolted to the intake ???

    Jon
     
    Last edited: Jul 28, 2025 at 4:35 PM
    pprather, mad mikey and Sharpone like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.