Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Is this ‘63 Impala too high

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Eth727, Sep 18, 2025.

  1. silent rick
    Joined: Nov 7, 2002
    Posts: 5,611

    silent rick
    Member

    I wasn't looking at his neck man
     
    bobss396 and 427 sleeper like this.
  2. Kosmos55
    Joined: Feb 23, 2022
    Posts: 111

    Kosmos55
    Member

    If you cut the springs in half it might sit right… of course the rear would need to come down ~10”.
     
    enloe likes this.
  3. Lone Star Mopar
    Joined: Nov 2, 2005
    Posts: 4,193

    Lone Star Mopar
    Member

    Yup, I got a nosebleed just looking at the picture..
     
  4. Eth727
    Joined: Jun 20, 2024
    Posts: 306

    Eth727

    So I ditched those moog springs are cut one coil off the original springs. Looks normal and rides better. Yeah stay away from moog springs. Post pics tomorrow
     
  5. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 7,008

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Let's re-examine the meaning of "high"... love the whitewalls with Cragars. In the 70s our family car was a '72 Nova with Cragars and Sears whitewalls.
     
    anthony myrick likes this.
  6. ClayMart
    Joined: Oct 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,722

    ClayMart
    Member

  7. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,683

    bobss396
    Member

    I took 2 coils out of my '66 Belair springs. I got them from Rock Auto, name brand.

    The wire diameter was a little bigger than the stock ones, that could do it. 20250608_093817.jpg We tried one side. It was way too high.
     
    enloe, tractorguy and 05snopro440 like this.
  8. 05snopro440
    Joined: Mar 15, 2011
    Posts: 2,941

    05snopro440
    Member

    Those MOOG springs were the right part number from what I recall when you were installing them. People here warned you that something was wrong at the time of initial install by your description that you were struggling to get them in with the car otherwise at full weight. It's always easier to sort out bad parts the first time.

    Now that you've changed springs and ride height it needs an alignment again.

    Did they ride stiff too? I've got a set of Moog springs waiting to go in my 62 Chevy. Generally, Moog stuff is very good. Maybe a mistake was made on that batch or part number.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2025
    tractorguy and Moriarity like this.
  9. Eth727
    Joined: Jun 20, 2024
    Posts: 306

    Eth727

  10. Eth727
    Joined: Jun 20, 2024
    Posts: 306

    Eth727

  11. Cut a couple coils
     
    enloe, 38Chevy454 and Moriarity like this.
  12. MAD MIKE
    Joined: Aug 1, 2009
    Posts: 942

    MAD MIKE
    Member
    from 94577

    Which part number did you use?
    6000, 6084, or 658A?

    Measure the free height of the spring as well as the wire diameter.
     
  13. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,782

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Rock Auto shows a couple of choices for Moog springs for 63 small block Impalas A 658A in the heavy duty side for 9 passenger wagons with air. or a 6000 for converts, hardtops or sedans without air .
    Are you sure that you don't have the station wagon springs?
    Back in the 60's when the jacked up in the front look was the hot lick it was common for guys with those Chevys to install a set of station wagon springs to lift the front end up but not use spacers or other nonsense. Screenshot (968).png Screenshot (969).png Screenshot (970).png
     
    tractorguy and big duece like this.
  14. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 7,008

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    I looked there also for the 6cyl application, same options. Thinking maybe with a spring for a lighter engine, it would settle down more with a v8. When I converted a '67 Camaro to BBC, I installed springs for a 396 car, but still had the 327 in at the time and the front end was raised until the engine swap.
     
  15. MAD MIKE
    Joined: Aug 1, 2009
    Posts: 942

    MAD MIKE
    Member
    from 94577

    *Laughs in ~650lbs of Stovebolt.*
     
  16. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 7,008

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Got me there... I figured the 6 would be lighter!
     
  17. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,169

    Budget36
    Member

    Would a ‘63 have a 230?
     
    05snopro440 and Johnny Gee like this.
  18. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 7,008

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Yes, they phased the stove bolt out in '62.
     
    05snopro440 likes this.
  19. Scott Younker
    Joined: Feb 3, 2022
    Posts: 335

    Scott Younker
    Member

    Coil Springs Specialties in Kansas is the place to go for coil springs. They can dial up or down depending on your taste & application. I’ve used them a few times and they have always been spot on for me. Personally, that original posted picture reminds me of a Jr Stock 1/4 mile car look and I LIKEY!
     
    Super/Stock Poncho likes this.
  20. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 5,244

    ekimneirbo
    Member
    from Brooks Ky

    If you cut coil springs 1/4 of a coil, how will they sit properly in the little "seat" on the A frame ? Seems like it needs to be a complete coil. Maybe one cut at a quarter turn could be split between top and bottom seats for minor adjustment. :cool:
     
  21. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 8,264

    RodStRace
    Member

    Just needed to raise the back a little!
    [​IMG]
     
    enloe, 427 sleeper and 63Biscuit like this.
  22. This is a Hot Rod and Custom car site, "Low Riders belong somewhere else, not here, They are neither Rod or Custom

    Oh Boy here comes the "Heat" !
     
  23. captaintaytay
    Joined: May 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,189

    captaintaytay
    Member

  24. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,982

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Yeah, what up widat?
     
    SS327 likes this.
  25. 550Coupe
    Joined: Jul 21, 2009
    Posts: 912

    550Coupe
    Member

    Looks like an early sixties Super Stocker. I like it.
     
    enloe and 65pacecar like this.
  26. I am sure I am late to the party I see you replaced the rebuilt the front end and replaced the springs did you do replace or rebuild any part of the rear suspension?

    If not, the front end may not be high the rear end might be low (sagged)
     
  27. lostn51
    Joined: Jan 24, 2008
    Posts: 3,098

    lostn51
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Tennessee

    I love the way you are going with this car, it’s looking really nice and would love to have it sitting in my driveway :D
     
    bobss396 likes this.
  28. 38Chevy454
    Joined: Oct 19, 2001
    Posts: 6,746

    38Chevy454
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    In my opinion the question should be "is this too low?" And the answer is always no.

    Even after you cut a coil, it sits too high for my preference. Cut another coil.
     
    63Biscuit likes this.
  29. 63Biscuit
    Joined: Mar 7, 2007
    Posts: 818

    63Biscuit
    Member
    from Hudson, WI

    I'll admit I'm biased, but I think '63 Chevies look best really low. This is how mine sits now...and it was lower until I moved over to disc brakes which required me raising the front end about an inch due to fender rub.
    [​IMG]
     
  30. 05snopro440
    Joined: Mar 15, 2011
    Posts: 2,941

    05snopro440
    Member

    I went with the CPP "original offset" front disc kit so it didn't kick the tires out like basically every other kit. Didn't need to raise the front, I'm tucking the whitewall on 15's on my 62.

    [​IMG]
     
    enloe likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.