Register now to get rid of these ads!

Featured Technical Is this ‘63 Impala too high

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Eth727, Sep 18, 2025 at 1:38 PM.

  1. silent rick
    Joined: Nov 7, 2002
    Posts: 5,606

    silent rick
    Member

    I wasn't looking at his neck man
     
    bobss396 and 427 sleeper like this.
  2. Kosmos55
    Joined: Feb 23, 2022
    Posts: 109

    Kosmos55
    Member

    If you cut the springs in half it might sit right… of course the rear would need to come down ~10”.
     
  3. Lone Star Mopar
    Joined: Nov 2, 2005
    Posts: 4,191

    Lone Star Mopar
    Member

    Yup, I got a nosebleed just looking at the picture..
     
  4. Eth727
    Joined: Jun 20, 2024
    Posts: 305

    Eth727

    So I ditched those moog springs are cut one coil off the original springs. Looks normal and rides better. Yeah stay away from moog springs. Post pics tomorrow
     
  5. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,990

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Let's re-examine the meaning of "high"... love the whitewalls with Cragars. In the 70s our family car was a '72 Nova with Cragars and Sears whitewalls.
     
    anthony myrick likes this.
  6. ClayMart
    Joined: Oct 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,715

    ClayMart
    Member

  7. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,679

    bobss396
    Member

    I took 2 coils out of my '66 Belair springs. I got them from Rock Auto, name brand.

    The wire diameter was a little bigger than the stock ones, that could do it. 20250608_093817.jpg We tried one side. It was way too high.
     
    05snopro440 likes this.
  8. 05snopro440
    Joined: Mar 15, 2011
    Posts: 2,939

    05snopro440
    Member

    Those MOOG springs were the right part number from what I recall when you were installing them. People here warned you that something was wrong at the time of initial install by your description that you were struggling to get them in with the car otherwise at full weight. It's always easier to sort out bad parts the first time.

    Now that you've changed springs and ride height it needs an alignment again.

    Did they ride stiff too? I've got a set of Moog springs waiting to go in my 62 Chevy. Generally, Moog stuff is very good. Maybe a mistake was made on that batch or part number.
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2025 at 7:34 AM
    Moriarity likes this.
  9. Eth727
    Joined: Jun 20, 2024
    Posts: 305

    Eth727

  10. Eth727
    Joined: Jun 20, 2024
    Posts: 305

    Eth727

  11. Cut a couple coils
     
    Moriarity likes this.
  12. MAD MIKE
    Joined: Aug 1, 2009
    Posts: 938

    MAD MIKE
    Member
    from 94577

    Which part number did you use?
    6000, 6084, or 658A?

    Measure the free height of the spring as well as the wire diameter.
     
  13. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,759

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Rock Auto shows a couple of choices for Moog springs for 63 small block Impalas A 658A in the heavy duty side for 9 passenger wagons with air. or a 6000 for converts, hardtops or sedans without air .
    Are you sure that you don't have the station wagon springs?
    Back in the 60's when the jacked up in the front look was the hot lick it was common for guys with those Chevys to install a set of station wagon springs to lift the front end up but not use spacers or other nonsense. Screenshot (968).png Screenshot (969).png Screenshot (970).png
     
    big duece likes this.
  14. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,990

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    I looked there also for the 6cyl application, same options. Thinking maybe with a spring for a lighter engine, it would settle down more with a v8. When I converted a '67 Camaro to BBC, I installed springs for a 396 car, but still had the 327 in at the time and the front end was raised until the engine swap.
     
  15. MAD MIKE
    Joined: Aug 1, 2009
    Posts: 938

    MAD MIKE
    Member
    from 94577

    *Laughs in ~650lbs of Stovebolt.*
     
    swade41 and loudbang like this.
  16. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,990

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Got me there... I figured the 6 would be lighter!
     
  17. Budget36
    Joined: Nov 29, 2014
    Posts: 15,146

    Budget36
    Member

    Would a ‘63 have a 230?
     
    Johnny Gee likes this.
  18. big duece
    Joined: Jul 28, 2008
    Posts: 6,990

    big duece
    Member
    from kansas

    Yes, they phased the stove bolt out in '62.
     
  19. Scott Younker
    Joined: Feb 3, 2022
    Posts: 331

    Scott Younker
    Member

    Coil Springs Specialties in Kansas is the place to go for coil springs. They can dial up or down depending on your taste & application. I’ve used them a few times and they have always been spot on for me. Personally, that original posted picture reminds me of a Jr Stock 1/4 mile car look and I LIKEY!
     
  20. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 5,230

    ekimneirbo
    Member
    from Brooks Ky

    If you cut coil springs 1/4 of a coil, how will they sit properly in the little "seat" on the A frame ? Seems like it needs to be a complete coil. Maybe one cut at a quarter turn could be split between top and bottom seats for minor adjustment. :cool:
     
  21. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 8,142

    RodStRace
    Member

    Just needed to raise the back a little!
    [​IMG]
     
  22. This is a Hot Rod and Custom car site, "Low Riders belong somewhere else, not here, They are neither Rod or Custom

    Oh Boy here comes the "Heat" !
     
    loudbang and Fitty Toomuch like this.
  23. captaintaytay
    Joined: May 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,189

    captaintaytay
    Member

  24. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 21,964

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    Yeah, what up widat?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.