Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rods Other engines

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by sweetdick2, Sep 14, 2025.

  1. johnnymac1
    Joined: Sep 16, 2012
    Posts: 277

    johnnymac1
    Member

    I sorta like marching to a different drum , realized I don't need a gazillion cubes or horsepower, just wanted lots of fun cruising. Had an old Chevy 250 six kicking around, figured why not. Then go and do what we do, bore it, balance it, deck it, plane it, lump port it, street port the exhaust, jump valve size, screw in studs, roller rockers, triple angle valve job, tri power, and let the fun begin. I get many, many comments on my choice, but it's all good. Wait and see what my plan is for my 32 Coupe build,
    IMG_20201214_135051679.jpg IMG_20160727_171811188_HDR.jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 26, 2025
  2. Jethro
    Joined: Mar 5, 2001
    Posts: 1,954

    Jethro
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Inlines rule! 20230311_151905.jpg
     
    skooch, Sharpone, 2devilles and 10 others like this.
  3. warbird1
    Joined: Jan 3, 2015
    Posts: 1,333

    warbird1
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Put 185 miles behind an "Other Engine" today. Avg. 17.4 mpg with dual quads. No fuss, no muss, no sbc Ross Lake 092325.JPG

    '31 A roadster with a Cadillac 331 and early Hydro...
     
  4. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,599

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    MPG is not a deal maker in hotrod speak but my blown flathead gets 14. As long as we are in double digits I think we have it made. I think we should call it MPS (miles per smile).
     
  5. 63Biscuit
    Joined: Mar 7, 2007
    Posts: 818

    63Biscuit
    Member
    from Hudson, WI

    The '63 Biscayne in my avatar is originally a 230ci inliner, and when that died I had a hot 292 Chevy put together with high compression pistons, lumpy cam, lump port head with SBC valves, 4-bbl, dual exhaust, etc. good for roughly 300hp and 300 lb-ft. I love the motor BUT it has turned into a "hybrid" consuming over a quart of oil in 450 miles. I love the motor, but I'll be deeper into a rebuild moneywise than going to a crate Chevy 350, and I'll get more power and torque outta the V8. Plus, I'm juts old enough now that I want to ensure reliability for my own driving and for when one of my daughters hopefully ends up driving it (they're 17 and 20 right now).
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  6. Toms Dogs
    Joined: Dec 16, 2005
    Posts: 972

    Toms Dogs
    Member
    from NJ

  7. D-Russ
    Joined: Mar 15, 2006
    Posts: 1,748

    D-Russ
    Member

    GMC 321.

    gmc.jpg
     
    Last edited: Sep 24, 2025
  8. benchseat4speed
    Joined: Feb 11, 2008
    Posts: 457

    benchseat4speed
    Member
    from Golden, CO

    If you have to ask why everyone runs this engine you’re dismissed. I’m not even gonna try to explain this one.
    IMG_0133.jpeg

    My ‘other’ engine lol. Some really cool powerplants in this thread!!
    IMG_0134.jpeg
     
  9. Ziggster
    Joined: Aug 27, 2018
    Posts: 2,723

    Ziggster
    Member

    Interesting…

    IMG_0379.jpeg
    IMG_0380.jpeg
     
    skooch and Sharpone like this.
  10. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,062

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Every flathead I have ever owned since 1957 got 14 mpg in regular use. Fords, Mercury's, stock, modified, and even worn out beaters.
     
    Sharpone and Bandit Billy like this.
  11. Stan Back
    Joined: Mar 9, 2007
    Posts: 2,685

    Stan Back
    Member
    from California

    Sedan Pix.jpg

    I put a 231" Buick iron V-6 in my Sedan. I used the standard cowl and hood and even saved the stock cowl gas tank and dash. I don't know the mileage, but I believe it's somewhere between 15 and 20. I've driven it to Bonneville a few times and in one trip, I'd calculated with my Isky Dream Wheel how many RPM would be needed with the 18s on the back to top 100 MPH. It was surely not a 1/4-mile, but came in soon with the old Halibrands needing better balancing!
     
  12. 1952henry
    Joined: Jan 8, 2006
    Posts: 1,571

    1952henry
    Member

    seb fontana likes this.
  13. saltflats
    Joined: Aug 14, 2007
    Posts: 13,457

    saltflats
    Member
    from Missouri

    I run a 409.
    20250730_162521.jpg
    20250924_153819.jpg
     
    BigRRR, CSPIDY, RMR&C and 3 others like this.
  14. chrisp
    Joined: Jan 27, 2007
    Posts: 1,287

    chrisp
    Member

    When you pay over $8.00 per gallon the smile tends to be tense.
     
    SS327, RMR&C, warbird1 and 3 others like this.
  15. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 15,599

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That would turn a smile into more of a pucker.
     
    Hotrodmyk and Sharpone like this.
  16. 1971BB427
    Joined: Mar 6, 2010
    Posts: 9,771

    1971BB427
    Member
    from Oregon

    The "why" for choosing a SBC or SBF or BBC, etc. is pretty simple. Not even sure why someone asks the why question?
    The reason is simply economics, and availability. These engines are common, parts are well supported, plentiful, and cheap; so it only makes sense for people to choose them. It may not be everyone's cup of tea, and for those who are brand loyal to various other engines they can build and install whatever they like. I have great admiration for those who swap in less common engines, and do so regardless of cost. It's not something I'll do as I'm always budget conscious, and "belly button engines" save me money that i can spend elsewhere on my builds. I'm not too concerned if others don't like my choice. If it bothers them too much I'd gladly accept a well built hemi, Pontiac, Buick, etc. if they want to help me be a non conformist and get rid of my belly button engines.
     
    GuyW and Sharpone like this.
  17. FlatheadFritz
    Joined: Nov 4, 2017
    Posts: 175

    FlatheadFritz
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Dodge 315 with 10:1 forged pistons and mild cam waiting for the 1930 Model A Coupe body and 1932 chassis to be completed. IMG_2041.png IMG_2040.png IMG_2039.png
     
    2devilles, BigRRR, Hotrodmyk and 7 others like this.
  18. ROADSTER1927
    Joined: Feb 14, 2009
    Posts: 3,284

    ROADSTER1927
    Member

    2devilles, 40two, warbird1 and 7 others like this.
  19. ROADSTER1927
    Joined: Feb 14, 2009
    Posts: 3,284

    ROADSTER1927
    Member

  20. dana barlow
    Joined: May 30, 2006
    Posts: 5,411

    dana barlow
    Member
    from Miami Fla.

    My first hotrod build in the late 1950s,I knew I wanted a over head valve V8. My limits were,had to be free or close to free an running with tranny needed. I hoped to find a Studebaker,but brand was not a must have! Tiny hotrod piggy bank,with luck, was what shaped what I'd use. The parts I could find,in the woods n down dirt roads dumped junk car,drag parts home,over the last 3 years of the 50s.
    I was lucky getting a Ford"Y" V8,w tranny! It ran with out needing much.
    I drove my 28A to Sr high school,love how it turned out,still have it !
    Even thought I also built a full custom Henry J,after finding out I super need a car with roll up windows an a top with fenders. { I put a Olds Rocket 88 in to the "J",got Olds from my buddy who was going into the Navy"} Also did an helped with a lot of rods for others,with a wide number of brand engines.
    I've kept my rod,"Y" powered always.
    Only updates are,now chrome headers an alt. replaced old gen. ,the rest still looks same as it did in Sr High. 001 (4).JPG
     
    2devilles, Charlie K, BigRRR and 9 others like this.
  21. GlassThamesDoug
    Joined: May 25, 2008
    Posts: 1,936

    GlassThamesDoug
    Member

    2bbl holleys, my kinda fuel system.
     
    Sharpone and rod1 like this.
  22. ekimneirbo
    Joined: Apr 29, 2017
    Posts: 5,258

    ekimneirbo
    Member
    from Brooks Ky

    Only on the Hamb is there a 1965 rule and its not devoid of exceptions. For the rest of the world, we get to decide what we want. I'm not going to knock the smallblock Chevy, I have always liked them and they earned their way as the top choice. That said, today the multitude of small blocks installed in old hot rods were not made before 1965. The 350 was not introduced until 1967. Most of the decent engines (power wise) by other manufacturers also came along during that time period.

    Personally I have a soft spot for the old Cadillac engines as I had a 33 Ford with a 365 Caddy and 2 fours in the sixties. Today I'm building a 32 Coupe and it will have the newer version 500 Caddy for an engine. I think they are a great choice for a driver with power. They are really inexpensive to purchase, often in running condition. They have low compression but decent heads. You can easily pull 500 HP from one, but their torq is there thru the whole rpm range......which makes driving one very pleasant. Still they can be made to accelerate very well by replacing the stock cam and rocker arms.....and still have torque everywhere......and run "regular" gas, not premium. Often they run as purchased and are reasonably low mileage, but you can purchase some cheap pistons ($250/$300) and bump compression a little and still run regular gas. I have 3 of them I picked up for $500 each. That seems to be the going price for one. Some come with a Turbo 400 attached. Mine is going to have a Tremec 6 speed manual tranny. ($$$) I wanted a trans that can take the torque and I like shifting gears. I should be able to cruise at 80+ mph and have the engine sipping gas with the overdrive.

    Here are a few pictures showing that some of these less popular engines do look good in hot rods.

    Intake example tp1.JPG

    Intake example 27d.jpg

    32 Ford Cad Engine 2x.jpg

    32 Ford Cad Engine 2 001.jpg

    Cad engine example 5j.jpg
    Cad ^^^^^

    Engine Picture 3a.jpg

    Engine Picture 20a.jpg

    Engine Picture 21a Cad.jpg

    Bad Engine 3.jpg

    Bad Engine 5.jpg

    32 Ford Cad Engine 1 001.jpg

    VCEarlyScriptNFinsPolish.jpg

    Lots of engines look good in Hot Rods.......but that doesn't mean I don't like or respect smallblock Chevy engines too.:):)
     
    2devilles, warbird1, CSPIDY and 6 others like this.
  23. Compare the actual regular mileage used by each and it's self explanatory.
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  24. Stephen Barrett
    Joined: Sep 24, 2019
    Posts: 838

    Stephen Barrett
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Here’s my Nailhead in a 32’ 5 window. IMG_9740.jpeg
     
  25. Jeff34
    Joined: Jun 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,218

    Jeff34
    Member

    I built this Cadillac for a boat I was building. Never built the boat. Thought about putting it in my roadster, but it's a monster! Sold it to a guy building his own boat in Seattle who has finished his project... boat 2.jpg
     
    warbird1, loudbang, RMR&C and 2 others like this.
  26. wheeltramp brian
    Joined: Jun 11, 2010
    Posts: 3,317

    wheeltramp brian
    Member

    Tell us about this monster Cadillac.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.