Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects Timm builds a model A

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Tim, Mar 8, 2016.

  1. RodStRace
    Joined: Dec 7, 2007
    Posts: 8,397

    RodStRace
    Member

    This build may not be using all the old Ford parts in HAMB style, but it should be one of the builds that is referenced for new folks that want to build an A.
    Get stuff to fit, get the car sitting right, make the parts work together.
     
    osage orange, Thor1, rjgideon and 2 others like this.
  2. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    As an aside to current focus I did spend most of Sunday looking at driveshaft options after talking to a friend about options for his project and looking for some resources.

    A quick measure got me in the 36.5” ball park for my project. The pinion is in the wrong position and there is a brace in the way of my tape measure but it’s close enough to let me look for donors.

    IMG_2082.jpeg As far as I’m aware my r10 over drive has a bolted on yoke as pictured above. No slip yoke!

    From what I’ve gathered I think Studebaker trucks and Willy’s truck may have been the only ones to get this option.

    which means I need a collapsing/ telescoping/ slip joint drive shaft depending on what brand your looking at.

    I found some JK jeeps have a front shaft that’s right exactly where I’d need to be. However the factory shafts have a weird flange on one end that wouldn’t work and the aftermarket’s with unjoints and a beefy cv joint that I don’t need are quite a bit out of budget.

    IMG_2083.png IMG_2084.png Then I stumbled across this option!
    Pork and Beaner had suggested a chevy slip shaft and looking around I found this one that seems to be the exact length I need. I’m not a c-10 guy but best I can tell this would be the second shaft in a factory set up that utilizes a carrier bearing. Like an X frame impala etc. I believe I’ve also seen this shown drive shaft listed for both c10 and impala so maybe it’s the same one.

    If I can find a good used one for cheap that would be ideal but the listed price for a new one is a lot less than what many new driveshafts cost shafts cost these days so buying it when the time comes isn’t the worst option either.

    maybe a c10 or impala guy could run a tape and confirm this is the same part?
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2025
    Stogy and Thor1 like this.
  3. Six Ball
    Joined: Oct 8, 2007
    Posts: 6,871

    Six Ball
    Member
    from Nevada

    I have never seen an R10 with a slip yoke. K need to check the stock shaft from my son's '54 wagon. I don't remember. The "slip" joint on my '68 C20 flat bed is mostly just a rubber bushing/connector at the front of the shaft. There isn't a lot of movement. Srver 4x4s have a slip joint in the front shaft.
    Great progress by the way!
     
    Stogy and Tim like this.
  4. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    @Six Ball surprising how little info I’m finding on the yokes. For as many vehicles that used these over drives I can’t find much talk about that specific bit.

    I was really curious if I could remove the bolt on yoke and swap a slip yoke in. That would simplify a fair amount.

    maybe I just havnt figured out the right search words or “stude speak”
     
    Stogy, Thor1, Six Ball and 1 other person like this.
  5. Six Ball
    Joined: Oct 8, 2007
    Posts: 6,871

    Six Ball
    Member
    from Nevada

    I 'll try to do some looking tomorrow. I have both piles of treasure and old parts books. I also have a guy working on my roof and a guy using my computer to take a DUI class. The guy on the roof knows what he is doing.
     
    Stogy and osage orange like this.
  6. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    lol well at least there’s one of you that does.

    I sifted through a lot of stuff this afternoon and found a video of someone taking a bolt on yoke off a ramble with this trans/over drive and the end of the shaft is threaded. So the yoke is not held on with a bolt into the center of the shaft like a th400 some times has.

    So I think you’d need to get the exactly same trans, over drive and other parts combo except with a slip yoke and then swap that shaft into your existing trans/overdrive set up.

    Im thinking for trans parts, a slip yoke, u joints and a drive shaft that $280 for a slip shaft with joints sounds like a much better deal.

    Though I am thinking that they probably don’t want you installing them at their full extended length so the one I found in the previous post is going to be to short. I’ll have to sort through a driveshaft website or something and find a donor that’s longer that I can cut down.

    Lord forbid we ever take the easy route lol
     
    Stogy, Six Ball and Thor1 like this.
  7. RAK
    Joined: Jul 15, 2011
    Posts: 183

    RAK
    Member

    Tim,
    I have an OD trans from an early 60's Lark V8 that has a yoke for a driveshaft (attachments). It looks to me like your trans could be from a C/K body Stude that used a 2 piece driveshaft or a truck as you said. stude od 1 (1).jpg stude od 2.jpg
     
    Stogy, Six Ball and Tim like this.
  8. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    Yeah best I can figure this car engine was rebuilt and then put in a truck. And then the drivetrain was pulled and bought at auction by the friend I got it from.
     
    Last edited: Sep 30, 2025
    Stogy and Six Ball like this.
  9. Six Ball
    Joined: Oct 8, 2007
    Posts: 6,871

    Six Ball
    Member
    from Nevada

    There's an easy route?
    Tim in my last post I was just talking about the other two guys but I understand why you put me in the group, and you are right.
     
    Stogy and Tim like this.
  10. rjgideon
    Joined: Sep 12, 2005
    Posts: 573

    rjgideon
    Member

    Before I moved to Texas, I needed a custom shaft made to mate up to a motorhome 727 that doesn't have a slip yoke. I took the measurements of everything with pictures to Fast Shafts in Des Moines and they had one done in a few days with the slip shaft as you showed before. It was around $325 if memory serves me, but that was about 20 years ago.
     
    Stogy and Tim like this.
  11. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    As much as I like the idea of finding an existing shaft that will work or one I can cut down I think having one made is probably the best use of time/ money. IMG_2117.jpeg found this on eBay and looks to be the ticket. Now I just need $300 and an eBay account. I’m not quite ready yet anyhow but it’s good to have it figured out before I’m ready.
     
    Stogy, Thor1, rjgideon and 1 other person like this.
  12. Jeff34
    Joined: Jun 2, 2015
    Posts: 1,218

    Jeff34
    Member

    IMG_4933.jpeg I have a '51 R10 from a Mercury, and it's got a slip yoke.
     
    Last edited: Oct 3, 2025
    Stogy, Tim and Six Ball like this.
  13. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    Yeah there’s a lot of them that take a slip yoke. In my nosing around I’m suprised at how many variations of even the same trans and over drive unit there are. Nash Healy - I believe- roadsters got them for maybe two years and they came with an end that was for torque tube!
     
    Stogy, Thor1 and Six Ball like this.
  14. nrgwizard
    Joined: Aug 18, 2006
    Posts: 3,027

    nrgwizard
    Member
    from Minn. uSA

    AFAIK, Stude R-10 OD(short case tailshaft, whether used behind a 6 or v8) used bolt-on u-joint w/a slip-joint on the 'shaft, R-11 OD(long-case tailshaft) used slip-yoke for the output. If you do go the used route, know that apparently there is some unwritten "law" that forbids greasing the slip-joints. Most every slip-joint I've worked with in the past(mostly non-stude, & 4x4, but still...), the splines were worn to the point that swapping slip-parts didn't work. Unless filled/packed w/grease, which lasted for all of ~10 seconds. If there is any movement other than forward n back, suspect that joint to be bad. FWIW. The ones for one of my IH 4x4s got a bit expensive, & that just was a stocker set-up.
    Marcus...
     
    Stogy, Thor1 and Six Ball like this.
  15. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    Good to know Marcus.

    I’ve seen a few in my googling around that have grease zerks on them, and some mention having seals, I assume in an attempt to keep the grease inside.
     
    Stogy and Six Ball like this.
  16. I've got an eBay account if that helps lol
     
    Stogy, Six Ball and Tim like this.
  17. Stogy
    Joined: Feb 10, 2007
    Posts: 27,089

    Stogy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Nice money shot there Jeff...what's behind the little blister...glad I clicked on it...;)
     
    Tim likes this.
  18. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    @Stogy a lot of times a small blister right there is for mag clearance
     
    Stogy likes this.
  19. I had a driveshaft made for the Chevy when I built it. I want to say the place was called Empire Driveline? Kind of a backyard shop in Kansas City. That was 15 years or so ago though...
     
    Stogy and Tim like this.
  20. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    Yeah I’ve seen the name pop up :)

    Going to start working on the rear springs tomorrow. Using my Sunday internet browsing to look at battery mounting spots. I had intended under the passenger side floor but between exhaust, ladder bars, and saddle tanks it’s really gonna be a squeeze.

    See a lot of guys put them on the firewall but I don’t love that idea for a few reasons.
     
    Stogy, Six Ball, Thor1 and 1 other person like this.
  21. So wait would early flathead 3 speed with od transmission parts help? I actually have access to a couple
     
    Stogy, Six Ball and Tim like this.
  22. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    @The Chevy Pope i wouldn’t mind having them around. They mostly used r10’s which is exactly what I have. Most r10 guts seem to interchange.
     
    Stogy likes this.
  23. I'll message my buddy. He had like two or three of them
     
    Stogy likes this.
  24. I may have a pic. I know they'd need love so definitely parts transmissions
     
    Stogy likes this.
  25. Six Ball
    Joined: Oct 8, 2007
    Posts: 6,871

    Six Ball
    Member
    from Nevada

    Yes, The R10 innards are mostly the same. The cases vary greatly and there are several different kick down switches. Different switches and alternate wiring are options. Solenoids can be repaired, never throw them away.
     
    Thor1, Stogy and Tim like this.
  26. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    If there is anything a hotrod guy knows how to do it’s keep and fix :) getting ready to cut a mount plate for the drivers side rear spring. I think I’ve got it mostly figured out. Getting harder and harder to crawl in and out of this thing as we add stuff but I don’t want to pull the body yet.

    came up with an idea for lower shock mounts as well since my original idea doesn’t have room to work
     
    Six Ball, Thor1, Stogy and 1 other person like this.
  27. Stogy
    Joined: Feb 10, 2007
    Posts: 27,089

    Stogy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Wow @Tim, ground ups are no cakewalk, that's for sure. Your original configuration was not really straightforward either but it's great to have the support from the members here and the others close to home to help round out the numbers and connect the dots.
     
    Six Ball, Thor1 and Tim like this.
  28. Tim
    Joined: Mar 2, 2001
    Posts: 19,908

    Tim
    Member
    from KCMO

    Yeah I can’t imagine trying to do this without the community.
     
    Six Ball, Thor1 and Stogy like this.
  29. Six Ball
    Joined: Oct 8, 2007
    Posts: 6,871

    Six Ball
    Member
    from Nevada

    I got here because this thing was going to run a 153 Chevy 4 banger. I stuck around because it is a cool build and I really like Stude V8s. If you had stuck to the 153 it would probably be on the road and just a little less cool than the Studebaker version. :D
     
    Thor1 likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.