Register now to get rid of these ads!

Featured Art & Inspiration Kodachrome

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Ryan, Nov 11, 2025 at 2:47 PM.

  1. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 22,788

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    I love the Fuji recipe… I like it far better than real Kodachrome. It gives you the color pop without losing all the dynamic range of the xtrans sensor.

    But, it doesn’t give me the same feeling as real Kodachrome… the shadows and highlights falloff differently and the grain isn’t right. I also think the color profile is a little too exaggerated.

    when I get to the office, I will post an image with the most downloaded Fuji recipe and my own for comparison.
     
    porkshop, 41 GMC K-18 and Sharpone like this.
  2. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 22,788

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    OK... Here we go. These are straight out of camera (Fuji GFX 50R). The Fuji Recipe is the McCurry Kodachrome based on Classic Chrome. It's the most "liked" emulation of Kodachrome, but they are all pretty close in profile to my eye.

    My version takes the original Fuji Raw and applies my Kodachrome Profile and then spits out a jpg. So, it's straight out of camera as well for all intents and purposes...

    Fuji Kodachrome:
    FujiKoda.jpg

    Ryan Kodachrome:
    RyanKoda.jpg

    A few things to notice:

    1. Mine is a bit cooler in tone... I used Nat Geo for all of my example images because there was very little if any aging to the colors themselves. I found them to be surprisingly cooler than most Kodachrome prints that I have physically.... and that have been exposed to UV for decades.

    2. Note the shadow and highlight falloff (look at the wheel well) on mine is a bit more gradual... The fuji feels more like manipulated digital than film to me. Like an Instagram filter or something... trying a bit too hard both with contrast and popping color.

    3. Grain. Fuji uses some sort of random generation on the grain and I don't like it. In monochrome, it can work... but I don't think it works at all in color. Mine feels more natural, because it sort of is... It's based off 200 iso Kodachrome and I think it just works better.

    A few things to keep in mind:

    1. I am not an expert. Not even close. I've never shot real Kodachrome in my life.... and much prefer Portra...

    2. This is all very subjective.

    3. Kodachome 64 has VERY little grain... and that's where mine has the biggest advantage I think. So take the grain away from both of these and I don't think the differences are all that obvious.

    I like grain though.
     
  3. 69fury
    Joined: Feb 24, 2009
    Posts: 1,724

    69fury
    Member
    from Topeka

    Outstanding!


    -rick
     
    Sharpone likes this.
  4. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,703

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I'm sorry but someone had to say it~

    … Kodachrome
    They give us those nice bright colors
    Give us the greens of summers
    Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, oh yeah
    I got a Nikon camera
    I love to take a photograph
    So mama, don't take my Kodachrome away! ;)

    You camera nerds amaze me with how you can manipulate images, for many years I have struggled with some of the better made manual cameras and film,after decades I decided that a simple digital point and shoot camera far exceeds anything I could do on my own. HRP
     
    porkshop and Sharpone like this.
  5. rob-redm
    Joined: Nov 15, 2005
    Posts: 6,548

    rob-redm
    Member

    I dig it...Those old Kodachrome just have a certain pop !
     
    porkshop, TerrytheK and Sharpone like this.
  6. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 22,788

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    Here's an example of how I got here. First shot is of a friend's kid in Hawaii... I shot it using a Leica M11 and a 35mm Lux. I just took it back to the flat raw and applied my Kodachrome profile and grain.

    Next shot is from McCurry's last roll of Kodachrome.

    My lens is far sharper than McCurry's, but everything else is as close as I can get it... I think colors and grain are pretty darned close.

    surf1.jpg

    surf2.jpg

    I need to take a*****load of shots featuring cars and then compare them to real Kodachrome shots of the same subject in like lighting conditions. Once I have done that enough, I will finalize my code, put it in the camera, and then presto - digital Kodachrome only camera.
     
    NoSurf, Joe Blow, porkshop and 6 others like this.
  7. TerrytheK
    Joined: Sep 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,631

    TerrytheK
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Interesting thread. What a rabbit hole you're exploring!
    I've shot loads of Kodachrome 64, in fact most of the older slides (1970s-early 90s) I have. Always found it a bit tricky to use depending on the lighting but when it worked the results were great.
    Over the past few years I've been digitizing many of my own slides and to be honest I'm not nearly as concerned about color accuracy. Many of those slides were taken by my dad, dating from about the same time frames as the Cobbs photos. And my prime objective is to preserve those [historical] images for easy viewing. I sometimes do some color tweaking in Photoshop, mainly to correct major degradation that can occur over time in the slides themselves, mostly stemming from improper storage.
    As far as cleaning slides, here's what I've done:
    Rinse them in a solution of VERY mild dish soap - a few drops in maybe a cup of room-temp water.
    Rinse again in clear room-temp water. I use bottled distilled water. Finally, I have a Kodak product called "Photoflo" which is a rinse that allows streak and spot-free drying of film. The issue here is that slides are generally in cardboard mounts, so I will carefully remove the slide itself from the mount before all this. I handle the slide itself with a small clamp along the edges or tweezers. I have plastic snap-together slide mounts to re-mount the slide.
    Most of the time though, if there's any major cleaning to do I'll retouch in Photoshop. It's way easier.
    Bottom line for me, as I said, is preserving the slide images. Most of the relatives and friends who've gotten copies of them aren't all that concerned about perfect color. When it comes to older photos, it could well be considered normal for the color to be a bit out of whack - part of the charm of older photos!
     
    porkshop, Sharpone and 41 GMC K-18 like this.
  8. TerrytheK
    Joined: Sep 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,631

    TerrytheK
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Don't worry man, I've got ya covered! ;)

    DSC_2311_1200.jpg

    Projection screen is in the background so no need to find a white garage wall.... :D
    The projector on the right is for medium-format (120/aka 2-1/4" square) slides. It's a genuine 1950s survivor that belonged to my dad and it still works.
     
    porkshop, brad2v, Moriarity and 2 others like this.
  9. 41 GMC K-18
    Joined: Jun 27, 2019
    Posts: 5,169

    41 GMC K-18
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Isn't it amazing @TerrytheK that only us older geezer's have such fine vintage projectors as these! @Moriarity wishes he had one of these!

    I still have all of the stuff that you have displayed, its great to participate in show and tell!

    Thanks from Dennis.

    vintage projector 1.jpg vintage projector 2.jpg vintage projector 3.jpg vintage projector 4.jpg vintage projector 5.jpg
     
    TerrytheK, brad2v, Sharpone and 2 others like this.
  10. Relic Stew
    Joined: Apr 17, 2005
    Posts: 1,241

    Relic Stew
    Member
    from Wisconsin

  11. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 22,788

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    It would take me all day to pull out all of my***** to prove my complete lack of self control when it comes to vintage camera gear, but I'll give ya a taste:

    01.jpg

    02.jpg

    03.jpg

    04.jpg

    05.jpg

    06.jpg

    The photo of the Harley is perfect Kodachrome colors and exposure... Your dad wasn't*****ing around man...
     
  12. 41 GMC K-18
    Joined: Jun 27, 2019
    Posts: 5,169

    41 GMC K-18
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    My interpretation of what "Carl Zeiss" really looked like !
    Those in the know, know he really didn't look like this, you would be surprised at how many people I have fooled with this piece of artwork !

    Carl Zeiss.jpg
    You definitely have a great addiction and a great collection of fine photographic gear!
    Thanks from Dennis.
     
    TerrytheK and Sharpone like this.
  13. lostn51
    Joined: Jan 24, 2008
    Posts: 3,255

    lostn51
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Tennessee

    Ryan you nailed it!
     
    TerrytheK, Sharpone and 41 GMC K-18 like this.
  14. 51 mercules
    Joined: Nov 29, 2008
    Posts: 4,389

    51 mercules
    Member

    Cool!I have breakfast sometimes on Saturday with Jim Davis an original member of the Krankers of Berdoo with Ron Aguirre(X-Sonic). He used to own a Camera Shop in San Bernardino and he's been selling off his camera collection. Been selling off a lot off cameras like you have.
     
    41 GMC K-18 and Sharpone like this.
  15. pwschuh
    Joined: Oct 27, 2008
    Posts: 2,960

    pwschuh
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I shot Kodachrome for a few years in my Nikon FE. Scanned all of the slides to digital over a decade ago and not sure I even still have the originals.
     
    41 GMC K-18 and Sharpone like this.
  16. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 22,788

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    If he has anything German made to get rid of, tell him to holler at me!
     
    41 GMC K-18 and Sharpone like this.
  17. 51 mercules
    Joined: Nov 29, 2008
    Posts: 4,389

    51 mercules
    Member

    Will do! Left him a message on his phone. I'll let you know!
     
    41 GMC K-18 and Sharpone like this.
  18. JD Miller
    Joined: Nov 12, 2011
    Posts: 2,646

    JD Miller
    Member

    Be fun watchin those in the rear view mirror blow out on the freeway :D ... I can picture the rice burners spinning out and crashing

    [​IMG]
     
    41 GMC K-18 and 51 mercules like this.
  19. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,409

    FrozenMerc
    Member

    Excellent work Ryan, and there is no need to apologize for falling down a rabbit hole.

    I came across this video a while back and was fascinated by the information presented. Is it relevant to what you are doing, perhaps, or perhaps not. But for those of us who are fans of a certain era and the engineering that was behind the scenes during that era, I found it absolutely fascinating.

     
  20. BrerHair
    Joined: Jan 30, 2007
    Posts: 5,112

    BrerHair
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Rabbit hole indeed . . . but I am dealing with it!

    Impressive nitpicking detail . . . you have an incurable illness (not that there's anything wrong with that).
     
    41 GMC K-18, Sharpone and TerrytheK like this.
  21. TerrytheK
    Joined: Sep 12, 2004
    Posts: 1,631

    TerrytheK
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Funny how we seem to run in circles sometimes.
    Lotsa folks thought digital was supposed to be the end of film. But now digital is imitating film?
    Huh. Who knew?
    So far, I've been able to manage my own obsession with vintage photo gear. Most of what I've kept is stuff that I actually use from time to time. Quite a while ago I sold this absolute piece of jewelry, a Zeiss-Ikon medium format:
    zeissikon2.JPG

    Used 120 film, rectangular 2-1/4" x 3-1/4" negatives. Sat around for I don't know how many years and I ran maybe a couple rolls of film through it. Yeah, I miss it at times but hopefully someone now is enjoying it in a way I never did. I do salute you guys and your collections of veteran Kodachrome-friendly equipment. Here's to keeping the Kodachrome legacy alive and well for future generations!
     
    kadillackid, 41 GMC K-18 and Sharpone like this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.