Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical brake fluid issue

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by dan utecht, Dec 26, 2025 at 11:08 AM.

  1. dan utecht
    Joined: Sep 12, 2017
    Posts: 4

    dan utecht
    Member

    i am plumbing my ch***is brake lines,on my 32 ply all new disc brakes all around.i have always used dot 5 on custom motorcycles,is dot 5 good to go on my hot rod. opinions?
     
  2. TCTND
    Joined: Dec 27, 2019
    Posts: 761

    TCTND
    Member

    You might get some pretty heated opinions on this. All I'll say is that I've used it in all my "speciality" vehicles (cars & bikes) for 30 odd years and never had an issue. Love that it's non hydroscopic and doesn't damage paint.
     
  3. dan utecht
    Joined: Sep 12, 2017
    Posts: 4

    dan utecht
    Member

    i appreiciate the input,i really prefer to use dot 5,the choppers i built got pretty heated brakes with no issues. thanks
     
    milwscruffy likes this.
  4. lake_harley
    Joined: Jun 4, 2017
    Posts: 2,453

    lake_harley
    Member

    I vote Yes on dot 5 brake fluid. I've used it in two hot rods and a front engine dragster without issue. To me it seems like a no-brainer if you're plumbing from scratch. You don't have to worry about contamination or mixing with other types of brake fluid.

    Lynn
     
    seb fontana and milwscruffy like this.
  5. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,019

    squirrel
    Member

    Just wait till you're done painting, before you put it in the car. It's a ***** to remove silicone, when prepping for paint!
     
  6. Bandit Billy
    Joined: Sep 16, 2014
    Posts: 16,113

    Bandit Billy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I use DOT 3 in all my stuff other than the dailies; they are new and get whatever the factory says to use. I have a hydraulic clutch in the roadster, and you cannot use DOT-5 in that so why carry 2 different types of fluid and chance using the wrong fluid when topping off a M/C? I used DOT-3 in the pickup that I built from scratch as well. Of course, the muscle cars and the dune buggy get the same. I only need one bottle in the cupboard. Works for me.

    And DOT-3 does not remove paint...If you build and flare your lines correctly.

    We almost made it to the end of 2025 without asking this one. So close. Oh well, thems the "brakes"!
     
  7. BJR
    Joined: Mar 11, 2005
    Posts: 11,360

    BJR
    Member

    NAPA has a Dot 3-4 Synthetic that we started to put in the cars at the collection I work at.
     
    winduptoy and Sharpone like this.
  8. lostone
    Joined: Oct 13, 2013
    Posts: 3,628

    lostone
    Member
    from kansas

    I prefer dot 4, any moisture is absorbed by the fluid, dot 5 the moisture pools together and can create a rust area where it pools.

    Dot 5 has more compression ability than dot 4. There's a reason dot 5 isn't used in new vehicles or motor cycles anymore or in hydraulic clutches.

    Dot 4 is easy to find anywhere. Again as stated above don't have to carry 2 separate brake fluids if you run a hydraulic clutch.

    Dot 4 is easily washed away with water should you get it on anything.

    Dot 5 isn't as popular as it once was, and I see they have come out with 5.1 that isn't compatible with 5. But going back to dot 4 compatibility.

    I expect 10 yrs from now dot 5 will be an orphan.

    ..
     
    winduptoy and warbird1 like this.
  9. Rodney Dangercar
    Joined: May 19, 2024
    Posts: 97

    Rodney Dangercar
    Member

    I've used Dot 5 for over 40 years in our fun cars and motorcycles without a problem. We live on the Pacific coast in a high humidity area and no problems with water buildup in the systems.

    Use what you believe is best for your vehicle is my recommendation. There are pros and cons to both...
     
    dirt t and seb fontana like this.
  10. Dot 3 and 4 are virtually identical fluids , only real difference is boiling point ( just like “ super dot 4 “ higher boiling point . You can mix dot 3 and 4 fluids with no ill gains . ( “ The book “ states you can top up 3 with 4 but not 4 with 3 , simply due to boiling point being lower on 3 .

    the

    I prefer dot 3 and 4 brake fluid , simply because it’s easy to find if you’re in a jam .

    Dot 5 is great fluid , does not harm paint if you have a slow drip and don’t see it . Not a fan of dot 5 , seems to leak more on the stuff I service at work over dot 3 or 4 fluid .

    the “ new “ super dot 5.1 glycol based fluid , seems cool . Can be mixed with dot 3,4 fluids not with dot 5 synthetic.

    I like simple and what’s easy for me to get when on the road .


    Also want to add dot 5 not being hydroscopitic is a bit of a misnomer .

    regular dot3 and 4 fluid the water it absorbs is distributed evenly in the fluid , that’s why when the fluid is contaminated with water , the water can boil and introduce air bubbles in the fluid and cause issues .

    dot 5 all the water will collect in the low points of the system, if you live someplace where it freezes you now have the possibility of ice forming in lines or other parts of the system creating a blockage , and also a big ol chunk of ice grating across seals and bores creating havoc .
     
    Last edited: Dec 26, 2025 at 6:01 PM
    V8 Bob, Bandit Billy and lostone like this.
  11. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,249

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER


    DOT-5 is already an orphan. It started as a military only item and spread to the mainstream. Unfortunately, it is incompatible with anti-lock brake systems, so none of the current manufacturers use it. This means it will die out or become a very expensive specialty item. I had it in my '68 Corvette, and once I got it in and bled correctly, it was great. Bleeding that system was one of the most frustrating experiences I have ever had.
     
    warbird1, winduptoy and V8 Bob like this.
  12. doug3968
    Joined: Sep 13, 2014
    Posts: 77

    doug3968
    Member

    Put dot 5 and all new or rebuilt brake parts in 39 chev 36yrs ago, haven’t needed to add more yet. Followed directions from Russell Eng, bleeding can be a pain.
     
    milwscruffy likes this.
  13. '29 Gizmo
    Joined: Nov 6, 2022
    Posts: 1,186

    '29 Gizmo
    Member
    from UK

    Dot5 (silicone) has 2 significant weaknesses

    1) its compressible so can't be used in ABS systems. It can also lead to more brake pedal travel

    2) water/frost. If moisture gets in, and it can it has nowhere to go. Its heavier than the brake fluid so s*** in the bottom if the cylinders and can't be removed through conventional bleeding. If it freezes in cold weather, no brakes. It can also corrode the cylinder and piston. I have seen this in Harley brake calipers.

    These are the reasons its hardly ever used in OEM applications.

    If you can live with these issues, its fine.
     
    V8 Bob likes this.
  14. V8 Bob
    Joined: Feb 6, 2007
    Posts: 3,165

    V8 Bob
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    JFYI, DOT 3 and 4 brake fluids are all technically "synthetic". Adding synthetic wording is just marketing.
     
    Beanscoot, BJR and 427 sleeper like this.
  15. I'm using Dot 5 and agree that bleeding can be agonizing. I've constantly fought a leak at the regulator, still unable to pinpoint precisely where the leak is occurring. It's not much, just enough to taunt me every time I climb under the frame to search for the problem.
     
  16. milwscruffy
    Joined: Aug 29, 2006
    Posts: 4,190

    milwscruffy
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    There will be lover & haters on this. I'm in the lovers camp as not a single issue with Dot 5 in over 40 years. I think the key is to have really well done flares, I bleed them as a one man job with a pressure pot bleeder.
     
  17. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,542

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    I think (the) bigger issue than the moisture debate is whether or not the (type) of rubber in any given brake system will be compatible with certain brake fluids.
    I'm not articulate enough to explain the pros/cons of it all so I'll let the real chemical experts put their stamp on it.
     
  18. CSPIDY
    Joined: Nov 15, 2020
    Posts: 985

    CSPIDY
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I put dot 5 in my 62 pickup in 1992, when I restored the brake system this year all I needed to do was run a light honing in the cylinders and replaced the seals. This truck sat for 28 years mostly out side.
    I put dot 5 back in.
    but
    On all my other cars I’ve switched to dot5.1, which is compatible with 3&4 but not 5!
     
  19. lake_harley
    Joined: Jun 4, 2017
    Posts: 2,453

    lake_harley
    Member

    Given the comments about soft pedal and bleeding issues, just make certain you don't shake the can of fluid and pour it in very gently so you don't introduce bubbles. Micro bubbles can take a while to rise to the surface in dot 5 fluid.

    Lynn
     
    osage orange likes this.
  20. '29 Gizmo
    Joined: Nov 6, 2022
    Posts: 1,186

    '29 Gizmo
    Member
    from UK

    A bit of a myth. ALL DOT fluids are compatable with the rubber used in brake system components. The issue is swapping fluid. Rubber absorbs a tiny amount of fluid so changing to an alternate chemistry can lead to contamination issues. Flushing with isopropyl alcohol can help if you want to swap.
     
  21. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,676

    Beanscoot
    Member

    Any idea of exactly why it is incompatible with anti-lock brake systems?
     
  22. tubman
    Joined: May 16, 2007
    Posts: 8,249

    tubman
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You can't use DOT 5 brake fluid (silicone-based) with anti-lock brakes because it foams easily when agitated by the ABS pump, creating air bubbles that lead to a spongy pedal and drastically reduced stopping power
     
  23. Beanscoot
    Joined: May 14, 2008
    Posts: 3,676

    Beanscoot
    Member

    Interesting. Thanks for that info.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.