Register now to get rid of these ads!

SBC Torque: 283 vs. 350

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Slide, May 1, 2007.

?
  1. 283 -- more tradition but less cubes

    16 vote(s)
    50.0%
  2. 350 -- more cubes but less tradition

    16 vote(s)
    50.0%
  1. Slide
    Joined: May 11, 2004
    Posts: 3,021

    Slide
    Member

    *If this has been covered before, please feel free to let me know what to search for... I'm coming up empty on the searches I've tried.

    How much torque can you reasonably expect out of a mild 283 compared to a mild 350?


    I have one of each, and both in running condition. I know the 350 is more cubes and longer stroke, but the 283 (from a 67 Impala) is just so much cooler looking and more in-line with the traditional flavor* I want this car to have.

    I have this 52 Chevy Fleetline that I'm pretty much just getting started on. The car will probably be more custom than rod, but I still would like to horse it around a little. I already have a Super T-10 and a 12-bolt posi waiting to be installed.

    They say you buy horsepower, but you drive torque... and I know torque is more fun on the street... especially in a heavier car like my Chevy.

    I did have a 283 in my previous 52 Chevy, but it was way worn out and running through a mushy TH350, so I can't really use that for a real comparison to the 350/Muncie that was in it when I sold it.

    To keep matters a bit more complicated, I'm considering keeping the 350 as a spare motor for my daily beater pickup.

    *I say traditional flavor, because this won't be a period perfect car. (See trans & rear axle info above.) Expect an alternator and probably radials... so dressing the 350 to have the earlier vibe wouldn't be out-of-character here.
     
  2. Rusty
    Joined: Mar 4, 2004
    Posts: 9,475

    Rusty
    Member

    Lets see some pics of the new ride!!!!! I vote 350 cause I may need the 283 for the 32 if I dont find a flatty for cheap
     
  3. 62_Galaxie_500
    Joined: Mar 30, 2007
    Posts: 116

    62_Galaxie_500
    Member

    My father's '56 Chevy has a bored-out 283 (about 299 ci IIRC)mated to a close-ratio T-10 and the original rear axle (3.73 ratio?) and it seems to have plenty of torque for cruising.
     
  4. No replacement for displacement. If it's got a hood, who cares?
     
  5. Omega
    Joined: Jul 11, 2006
    Posts: 874

    Omega
    Member
    from Mass

    he cares.


    Regardless, id go with a 283. sounds cooler.
     
  6. hotrodsnguns
    Joined: Apr 3, 2004
    Posts: 545

    hotrodsnguns
    Member
    from Fresno, CA

    Dress the 350 up with the 283 stuff no one will know the difference
     
  7. Slide
    Joined: May 11, 2004
    Posts: 3,021

    Slide
    Member

    Not much to look at, but...
    [​IMG]

    If I do keep the 350 in the car, I'll prolly harvest some of the cool stuff off of the 283 (bracketry, cooling fan, valve covers, points dizzy, etc.) to stick on the 350.
     
  8. hellbound gasser
    Joined: Dec 13, 2005
    Posts: 435

    hellbound gasser
    Member

    Honestly, no one will know about the t10 and rear end, but with a front fill intake (from a 283), chevrolet script valve covers and a powemaster generator lookalike most people wont be able to tell the difference between the 283and the 350, unless they look for a road draft tube....
     
  9. Slide
    Joined: May 11, 2004
    Posts: 3,021

    Slide
    Member

    It's true that I could make the 350 look passable to all but the purists...

    I guess the heart of the matter is whether or not I should put the 283 in the Fleetline and keep the 350 for if/when my 89 pickup gets too many miles on it.
     
  10. Deuce Roadster
    Joined: Sep 8, 2002
    Posts: 9,519

    Deuce Roadster
    Member Emeritus

    The 350 will pull the old Chevy around so much better. Keep the hood down and enjoy the 350.
     
  11. Dirty2
    Joined: Jun 13, 2004
    Posts: 8,902

    Dirty2
    Member

    Its going to have a hood on it and ac, and power steering . You will need more power to run the compressers for the bags, all that billit stuff . So go with the 350. I have a BOP 350 auto with a lockup. (overdrive) if you need it. Just kidding but I do have the trans..
     
  12. 1950Deluxe
    Joined: Mar 18, 2007
    Posts: 24

    1950Deluxe
    Member
    from Kansas

    Just my input but I would put the 283 in the 52 and keep the 350 for your truck because you will need more torque in the truck for when you bring your next project home on the trailer or tow strap. Put the 283 in the old coupe, it will get decent gas milage and still leave the 350 for the truck!!!
     
  13. 1.1 ft-lb of torque per cubic inch is a good figure for mild to moderate street engines. You do the math.
     
  14. I'm with Danny....if you're going with A/C and alternator, then I'd go with the extra cubes....especially in a car that size.
     
  15. s.r.i.
    Joined: Aug 6, 2005
    Posts: 1,078

    s.r.i.
    Member
    from Hell

    It is a LOT more fun to look at headlights in the mirror, then tail lights in your windshield.
     
  16. Rand Man
    Joined: Aug 23, 2004
    Posts: 5,127

    Rand Man
    Member

    You'll feel a big diff. Use the 350 and make no excuses.
     
  17. Slide
    Joined: May 11, 2004
    Posts: 3,021

    Slide
    Member

    Alright... I guess it's the 350 for the Fleetline... but I might go ahead and stick the 283 in it just to get it on the road, while I build the 350 for a little more grunt. Hmmmm... 350 cubes could take advantage of 8 barrels....

    Danny-- you know I want that auto... NOT! :D
     
  18. skajaquada
    Joined: Sep 14, 2004
    Posts: 1,642

    skajaquada
    Member
    from SLC Utard

    how's that gonna help him...the holes won't line up on the bellhousing :p plus he'd have to wire up a lockup switch/sensor for that bastard. no fun there:rolleyes:
     
  19. Dirty2
    Joined: Jun 13, 2004
    Posts: 8,902

    Dirty2
    Member

    BOP's fit em all. A toggle switch and a pressure switch is easy .:confused:
     
  20. skajaquada
    Joined: Sep 14, 2004
    Posts: 1,642

    skajaquada
    Member
    from SLC Utard

    since when do BOP fit everything...never heard that. only know about the dual pattern ones from the late 70's working for everything.
     
  21. Skankin' Rat Fink
    Joined: Jun 18, 2006
    Posts: 1,512

    Skankin' Rat Fink
    Member
    from NYC

    I'd go with the 283, but that's just me. Of course, a 350 that looks just like a 283 is almost just as good.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.