Register now to get rid of these ads!

radius rod mount, opinion needed

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by flathead31coupe, Jul 25, 2007.

  1. flathead31coupe
    Joined: Mar 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,596

    flathead31coupe
    Member
    from indpls, in

    witch mount would be best to use on a boxed model a frame, and why.... 916-35015_R.jpg

    916-35050_R.jpg
     
  2. Harrison
    Joined: Jan 25, 2002
    Posts: 7,133

    Harrison
    Member

    I like the ones on the bottom with the built-in gussets.

    They would look better too. Neat & clean. Tucked up under the rails.

    JH
     
  3. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    Both aren't bad.....if ya use the top ones, weld 'em to the INSIDE of the rails and use the bolt holes as plug welds......then a triangle gusset from frame bottom towards eye......
     
  4. flathead31coupe
    Joined: Mar 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,596

    flathead31coupe
    Member
    from indpls, in

    so both would work, with no pro/con with eaither...i was just sujested to use the bottom, with a boxed frame, with no explanation to why it was better than the top ones....
     
  5. SimonSez
    Joined: Jul 1, 2001
    Posts: 1,666

    SimonSez
    Member

    I'll give it a go ...

    If you had an un-boxed frame, you would be better to use the top style as it is mounted to the side of the frame which would be the strongest place.

    But when the frame is boxed, the bottom flange would be rigid enough to weld the lower mount to it, and since it is gusetted it will end up being stronger.


     
  6. flathead31coupe
    Joined: Mar 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,596

    flathead31coupe
    Member
    from indpls, in

    so the bottom of the frame rail would be ideal,if it was strong enough, if a stock model a frame..so when you boxed it, its now strong enough, but if i have already have the top ones, any reason to change the the bottom ones other than looks....
     
  7. s.r.i.
    Joined: Aug 6, 2005
    Posts: 1,078

    s.r.i.
    Member
    from Hell

    If you already have the top ones, just use them. The reasons were explained, but the advantage is marginal and both styles have been used for years.
     
  8. flathead31coupe
    Joined: Mar 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,596

    flathead31coupe
    Member
    from indpls, in

    cool thanks i will use the ones i have, on the inside of the boxed frame...then a triangle gusset from frame bottom towards eye......as stated in an ealier post....
     
  9. Ole don
    Joined: Dec 16, 2005
    Posts: 2,915

    Ole don
    Member

    No real need for the gusset, the force is front to rear, not side to side. Use 'em, they will be fine. Look for cracks and tears after the first long trip, then once a year.
     
  10. flathead31coupe
    Joined: Mar 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,596

    flathead31coupe
    Member
    from indpls, in

    ok just when i thought i was out they pull me back in.....the need to ck for cracks is because of that style of mount,or would that apply to the other mount as well...
     
  11. flathead31coupe
    Joined: Mar 23, 2006
    Posts: 1,596

    flathead31coupe
    Member
    from indpls, in

    well with going with the top mounts, making sure the axle is square, set at the ride hight, and my mounts clamped in place i have 5 degree caster...so now iam thinking of setting the cross member back more, it was only 4 degrees when i got the frame...its an after market one for a boxed frame....
     
  12. Rusty
    Joined: Mar 4, 2004
    Posts: 9,487

    Rusty
    Member

    5 degrees is fine
     
  13. Rusty
    Joined: Mar 4, 2004
    Posts: 9,487

    Rusty
    Member

    Also the bottom ones have 5/8 I believe holes for heim joint / bolts the top ones has a tapered hole for early for tie-rod ends

    Rusty
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.