Register now to get rid of these ads!

Hot Rod Problem Solving- Any Ideas

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by JimA, Oct 8, 2007.

  1. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED

    I'm not looking to rip off any great ideas you might have, but as an extension of my SO-CAL shop I am working on some ideas for products that are missing or needed in the hot rod world.
    Some of the ideas include the parts that are not available to make a "traditional" car from scratch from 100% new parts (as simple as a license plate light). Also I have ideas to make pieces that have a more vintage look where now only flame-cut parts are available. These parts WORK great in most cases, just look "too new" for a retro car (almost billet). I'm not just talking about hot rods, but even when you open the hood of a '50s or '60s style machine I like every thing under the hood to look "period" and that's the kind of products I want to make.

    I also have some ideas for parts to disguise some of the blatantly modern pieces currently used in most builds. One of these pieces will cure that Borgeson joint and double-D shaft that JUMPS OUT AT YOU under the hood of an otherwise traditional early hot rod. My dad just got a really nice early style hot rod- and that steering shaft next to a nicely dressed flathead really bothers me.

    Let me know what you think- Thanks Jim
     
  2. Rusty
    Joined: Mar 4, 2004
    Posts: 9,474

    Rusty
    Member

    All the early Ansen stuff, motor mounts, pedals, Cal Custom stuff, early wire, chrome generators, regulators, I know some of that is store bought stuff but it is usually in high demand.
     
  3. Frank
    Joined: Jul 30, 2004
    Posts: 2,325

    Frank
    Member

    You mean like castings or machined parts? Or sheet metal and brackets and such?
     
  4. Evel
    Joined: Jun 25, 2002
    Posts: 9,044

    Evel
    Member
    1. 60s Show Rods

    Mad Fab DVD's are missing at So-Cal LA hahahahahahahaahaha
     
  5. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED

    You should have been invited to stop by with Troy today for lunch- let me know if you are in the neighborhood or just want to send me the stuff- Thanks Jim
     
  6. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED

    I'm thinking cast pieces- and brackets made from more interesting stock like oval tubing.
     
  7. I'd kill for a tilt steering column that was no larger than the collar on a '40 Ford column. Make it as small as a '39 collar & you're a true hero.

    JH
     
  8. brandon
    Joined: Jul 19, 2002
    Posts: 6,369

    brandon
    Member

    seems like tri-c makes a small column like that.... brandon:D
     
  9. Fat Hack
    Joined: Nov 30, 2002
    Posts: 7,709

    Fat Hack
    Member
    from Detroit

    Good ideas:

    New (repo) Ford wide-5 wheels

    New stock (repo) 32 front axles & unsplit bones

    New (repo) 40 ford steering boxes

    New or rebuilt banjo rear axles (closed drive) with upgraded INTERNALS

    New (repo) 6v cloth covered wire harnesses for flatheads w/generators

    New Model A frames for flatheads (AV8s) that don't LOOK like brand new 2x3 frames...I'm thinking faithfull reproductions of a Model A frame with flathead V8 mounts.

    Bad Ideas:

    Things that cover up or "hide" modern components strike me as being worse than having those components there in the first place (on a truly "traditional" car). To build a faithfull "traditional" or "period correct" car, means just that...no "modern" stuff...hidden or otherwise, right??? Concentrate on reproducing 'new' stuff that passes for suitable 'service replacement' parts for the old stuff that is often worn out, beat-up, hard to find or overpriced.

    It WOULD be cool to be able to build an accurately styled trad car from 100% new parts if some of those parts were available!
     
  10. They do...... but the SOB is $700. :eek:

    JH
     
  11. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED

    I hear you Hack- but when you see what I'm talking about it's not really the same as Olds valve covers on a Chevy- and believe me, if I had the money to produce a BRAND NEW side load steering box (F-100 with upgraded internals) that would be at the top of my list! But unless someone has an extra quarter million you get that one started it won't be happening soon.

    Most of the items on you list are also thankfully being produced currently by other people.
     
  12. DirtyThirty
    Joined: Mar 8, 2007
    Posts: 2,396

    DirtyThirty
    Member
    from nowhere...


    I agree...completely.
    thats why I built a "traditionally-styled" hot rod...
    I think people get WAY too hung up on this...I personally would rather brazenly flaunt my MSD, then hide my "modern" dist., in shame, under a phony Magneto cover...but thats just me, and I'm not inflexably bound by tradition...
     
  13. Fat Hack
    Joined: Nov 30, 2002
    Posts: 7,709

    Fat Hack
    Member
    from Detroit

    Ha Ha...the world certainly doesn't need any more of THAT for sure!! :D
     
  14. joeycarpunk
    Joined: Jun 21, 2004
    Posts: 4,446

    joeycarpunk
    Member
    from MN,USA

    Cast aluminum radiator drops for lower flathead hoses, I've seen some custom ones, but I don't know of anybody producing them. Lots of people lower the radiator/grille height and have to deal with this problem.
     
  15. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    It'd be really cool to build a "trad" car 100% from a catalog.......
     
  16. hudson_hawk
    Joined: Aug 27, 2002
    Posts: 646

    hudson_hawk
    Member

    cal custom/badger style scoops are needed out there
     
  17. DirtyThirty
    Joined: Mar 8, 2007
    Posts: 2,396

    DirtyThirty
    Member
    from nowhere...

    well, now thats just blatant, outright, falsifying...
    :D
    I don't know...I think, part of me at least, that it IS nice to see truly "correct" cars, but, I also think that being driven mad by something like the DD steering shaft, is actually splitting an even finer hair than the obvious "faux-olds" valve covers...It IS after all, 2007...
     
  18. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED

    Don't know if you are joking- but many are doing it and coming up short in a few areas- and that's what I would like to address. I tried it myself and ended up with a few parts I still don't like and would like a more "traditional" (i.e. NOT Street Rod) alternative.
     
  19. DrJ
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 9,419

    DrJ
    Member

    That one's easy, just make one that looks like a cross drilled Snap-on or Craftsman 3/4" drive wobbly. :cool:
     
  20. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED

    Yeah, but Lokar linkage and other "modern" pieces will NEVER look right to me on or next to a vintage mill no matter what year it is. No one says you have to buy it, but if the alternative exists I'd at least like to put it out there. There were people that said a reproduction '32 Roadster body would NEVER sell- have you seen the backlog??
     
  21. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 57,606

    squirrel
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Kill two birds with one stone...if you make the right steering gear, then guys won't need the borgeson ujoint.

    Seriously though, I thought much of the fun of building a trad car is finding the old parts. I guess I'm just not with it.
     
  22. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED

    I love the hunt too- but outside of the HAMB lots of guys just want to buy it all new and are stuck with some parts that are the ONLY option. And I'm not saying you have to have a 100% new car to use these parts- but at least have all the areas covered rather than just a select few.
     
  23. DirtyThirty
    Joined: Mar 8, 2007
    Posts: 2,396

    DirtyThirty
    Member
    from nowhere...

    oh, yeah...you know it! hey, I'm not against even 'glass bodies...I like different things for different reasons, ya' know? I don't like the overly-slick look of Lokar stuff, either, but, it comes down to exactly that: the look. Modern, does not bother me, in and of itself...what bothers me is: Bulky, Overly-slick, un-appealing forms, whether modern or not. Thats why I don't like a Mustang Two suspension on a fenderless car...not 'cuz the car is now not absolutely "period correct", but because its not attractive.
    My opinions, tend to vary daily, also...:D
    the important thing, to me, is to not mix styles...no flathead powered modifieds with difital dashes, ya' know?
    I think it drains the enjoyment, when it is SUCH an obsession with historical accuracy...starts to sound like restoration...not hot-rodding...
     
  24. JimA
    Joined: Apr 1, 2001
    Posts: 4,795

    JimA
    BANNED

    I'm totally with you! I just don't like being taken out of the illusion of a car being from 1955 over a $50- part.
    I'm only obsessed with keeping the UGLY parts off and trying to solve the situations where the ONLY option is something modern and unattractive. Beauty is in the parts- old or new.
     
  25. Slide
    Joined: May 11, 2004
    Posts: 3,021

    Slide
    Member

    Does anybody make any spark plug wire looms or line clamps that look like they belong on an old car?

    How about a steering column that has a built-in turn signal switch, but looks like it came from 1957 or so? (Not the ididit/Flaming River/junkyard GM stuff.)

    A cable-operated throttle pedal that looks like something from a 50's car... the 30's guys have several choices of "spoons", but these don't look any better in a sled than the billet stuff IMO.
     
  26. the "eliterate"redneck
    Joined: Jun 26, 2006
    Posts: 341

    the "eliterate"redneck
    BANNED

    if its billet ,blast it and spray it gray. looks cast.

    "mustangs"(86-93)have traditional looking joints. and ive used the 65-70 gearboxes so many different ways.


    so if your doing a resto job then those parts would be great
    but if your (hot rodin) then you make what you dont have and MAKE it look right:cool:
     
  27. Roupe
    Joined: Feb 11, 2006
    Posts: 723

    Roupe
    Member

    I just saw some cast radiator drops on someones web site a couple weeks ago. Give me a minute I can't remember who's site it was.
     
  28. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,638

    Paul
    Editor

    leaf springs that taper like old stock springs

    header tubes with less sharp radius bends

    easy recolor kit for modern graded fasteners
     
  29. eaglebeak
    Joined: Sep 17, 2007
    Posts: 1,283

    eaglebeak
    Member

    I'm having a hard time finding a reasonable priced '49 Chev license plate frame. These could be cast aluminum and chromed.
    I thought I saw an ad for them once. Maybe Briz?
     
  30. Kevin Lee
    Joined: Nov 12, 2001
    Posts: 7,626

    Kevin Lee
    Super Moderator
    Staff Member

    I think what you're wanting to do is a really good concept. And I have given a lot of thought to this sort of thing over the past few years myself - even came up with a few items I'd like to produce eventually. But it's sometimes maddening how finicky a hot rodder can be. (and I'm among the worst) Seems no matter what you would do and how universal you want to make it you're producing for a niche market within the hot rodding niche. And if it's a traditional part you're three levels deep minimum.

    I've had good luck with what I do (the wheelcovers) and I think it came from just doing what I wanted for myself. Then the rest just happened. Seems like you have the same sort of mindset so as long as you don't end up producing something like, "retro styled finned aluminum Borgeson u-joint covers" or something I'll bet it works out.

    Good luck. The Ansen suggestion seems cool. And the radiator drops are smart. (I've actualy seen those before but the manufacturer was pretty obscure... if I knew SoCal carried them I would call them first.)
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.