Register now to get rid of these ads!

optimal freeway RPM's for a small block chevy??

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 49ratfink, May 28, 2008.

  1. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,935

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    lets say yer gonna go 200 miles on the freeway... what RPM would be the max you'd care to run for that long??

    my last chevy (350) would spin 3000 at freeway speed, which I guess was around 65 -70. going with the flow of traffic. I didn't like to go above that for prolonged periods.

    my new car will have a 305, 700R4 and 3.08's. even with smallish tires at 24" tall I'll be spinning 2000 @ 70 MPH. somthing like that... (I lost my link to the RPM / MPH formula)

    what do you think?? at what point to yo start putting excessive strain on your motor??
     
  2. Buzznut
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,349

    Buzznut
    Member

    I don't like running over 2,500 rpm max for extended periods of time. Most engines are not efficient above that range, and if you're going hundreds of miles at 3,000 plus you had better have a ****** cooler as well. For mileage (and peace-of-mind) 1,800 to 2,200 seems about right...
     
  3. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    i would think that on a good engine 2000 rpm would be good.. good fuel economy, good for the life of the engine. some where around between 2000 and 2500.
     
  4. 53sled
    Joined: Jul 5, 2005
    Posts: 5,817

    53sled
    Member
    from KCMO

    Depends more on the cam profile, to get in the sweet spot. anything below 3000 would be safe, as long as you're cooling system is up to it. I wonder if 2000 is enough to get into a 305's torque band?
     
    rhoke398, bonesy and tb33anda3rd like this.
  5. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,935

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    I wonder if 2000 is enough to get into a 305's torque band?


    that's kind of what I was wondering too.... I might have to do 85 - 90.
     
  6. jchav62
    Joined: Jan 30, 2007
    Posts: 1,932

    jchav62
    Member

    2500-3000...
     
  7. gnichols
    Joined: Mar 6, 2008
    Posts: 11,412

    gnichols
    Member
    from Tampa, FL

    Seems someone on this list just told me about carefully monitoring manifold va***e for optimum running - and how it is directly related to fuel consumtion and the proper running of the carb. And metering fuel air ratios? I've never done that but certainly will on my next build. I image if you are "lugging" it, either or both of these measurements will be effected, along with mileage, eh? Or not? Gary
     
  8. Buzznut
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,349

    Buzznut
    Member

    Are you building the engine? If so, there are a few ways to get the torque band down. If you want low end torque out of a 305 you need to keep the cam small...larger cam shifts the rpm up. With 3.08's you will have a bit of a time getting where you want to be. Raising the compression ration would help, and headers would help too, but just keep the cam small.
     
  9. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage


    absolutly true!
     
  10. raven
    Joined: Aug 19, 2002
    Posts: 4,707

    raven
    Member

    Like 53sled said, your cam will dictate where the sweet spot is in the RPM range. You want to be cruising where you are just starting to 'climb up' on the torque/power range of your cam.
    Either find a cam that will fir your rear gears and final drive ratio of your ******, or find a cam that suits you and change the other two to match your cam.
    r
     
  11. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    im working on this very issue right now with my 53 chevy with a 327 in it.
    I just got done putting larger valve heads on it with a bit larger cam in it. my trans is a th350 and rear gear is 3:73 and a 26" tall tire in the back..im thinking with all the math that i did my 65 to 70 mph cruzin mode should be right in the sweet spot of this combo..night before last on my way down the e-way she felt so much better. and if i stuck my foot in it at 70 she would pull like a beast.
    Im hoping i nailed it. just got to do a bit more tweeking on the timing and carb adjustments .
     
  12. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,935

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    the 305 came from a wrecked Trans Am. I regasketed it, hi output oil pump, new timing chain and a "RV Grind" cam... don't recall the specs, my machine shop guy picked it out. edelbrock performer and a Holley 390. no headers, but 2" duals.

    I think I may have gone from one extreme to the other... too many freeway RPMs in the last one, and not enough in this one.
     
  13. Shifty Shifterton
    Joined: Oct 1, 2006
    Posts: 4,964

    Shifty Shifterton
    Member

    Decades ago Jeff Smith and super chevy did a SBC efficiency series that went fairly in depth. Car was a 70-72 monte. Moral of the story was cruise RPM in the range of 1800-2200 worked best for most p***enger car builds.

    I have OT cars with overdrive and drag race gears that do road trips at 3100ish. Was nerve racking at first, tens of thousands later no biggie. But I also change oil every 3k with full synthetic. Also I have a non OD pickup with a 454 that cruises 32-3300 all day long with a loaded car trailer and 1500 lbs of junk in the bed. Chevy geared it that way, not me. Barely whimpers with tall hills and huge loads.

    You should see some of the RPM punishment 350s take in ramp/tow trucks and duallys. Some of those guys turn nearly 4k going down the highway.
     
  14. Shifty Shifterton
    Joined: Oct 1, 2006
    Posts: 4,964

    Shifty Shifterton
    Member

    Not to be a post hog, but 3.08s and OD is right on the edge of acceptable IMO. GM loved to do that combo on G bodies, and they just don't use OD unless it's on clear highway, and even then it's kicking out the converter for everything. MCSS used 305/OD/3.73 with great success, I put 100K on one and it's a very acceptable setup, and much easier on the engine and trans too. RPM and speeds just match up and rarely does either component struggle against the other. Good luck
     
    olscrounger likes this.
  15. specialk
    Joined: Sep 28, 2005
    Posts: 598

    specialk
    Member

    All I know is my 62 C10 with a 4.10 does 3000 rpm @ 65mph and it is NOT a comfortable ride :( At least with the manual transmission I'm not worried about a cooler.
     
  16. el Scotto
    Joined: Mar 3, 2004
    Posts: 4,722

    el Scotto
    Member
    from Tracy, CA

    In my '57 Chevy truck with a 350, T-5, and 3.08 geared twelve bolt with 30" tall tires I usually cruise about 2200 rpm, I'll go 2500 rpm if I need to get somewhere in a hurry, or 3000 in 4th going up hills.
     
  17. The Hank
    Joined: Mar 18, 2008
    Posts: 779

    The Hank
    Member
    from CO

    Damn I had a 92 chevy PU [ 5 speed standard ] 5.7 and it would cruise about 75 right around 1800 rpm . very smooth. It was geared tall. It seemed to be at the lower end of the power range.
     
  18. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 22,857

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    Weird how this works... I've just been thinking about this as well... Here is what I am doing (I think):

    - zz383 crate motor: torque comes on at about 2300rpm
    - 700r4 ******
    - 27" tall tires

    The car (kind of a secret at the moment) currently has 4.11 gears in it and it's wrapped too tight at highway speeds even with the OD. So, I'm thinking I'm going to go with a 3.55 rear gear.

    That should put me at about 2311 rpms at 75mph and 2619 rpms at 85mph.
     
  19. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,935

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    who's got the RPM's x trans X tires = speed formula?

    I have it onmy computer at home...not here where I'm supposed to be working.
     
  20. SinisterCustom
    Joined: Feb 18, 2004
    Posts: 8,277

    SinisterCustom
    Member

    I run @ 2500rpm at 60 mph in my hotrod pu, 350/th400/3.73/33" tires....seems to like it just fine.
    My OT car w/440 runs @ 3500 rpm.....@ 65mph.....been that way for years....
     
  21. raven
    Joined: Aug 19, 2002
    Posts: 4,707

    raven
    Member

    I'd suggest you not use the 390 cfm Holley on a 305, especially if you have a non-stock cam.
    It'l starve the engine.
    USe a Holley 600 vac*** secondary and tune the secondary spring.
    r
     
  22. Terry
    Joined: Jul 3, 2002
    Posts: 1,824

    Terry
    Member

    I think you guys are under-shooting it a bit. For 2 years I drove Odessa to Lubbock, then returned every weekend. I drove a 56 Chevy pickup with a 30 over 350, M22 4 spd, and a set of 388s in a '69 12 bolt. Thats about 300 miles each weekend counting in the town driving.

    At 75 - 80 I averaged 3800 - 4000 RPMs. When I finally wore the motor out it had over 100,000 miles on it.
     
    tb33anda3rd likes this.
  23. Imo, lugging the engine is harder on it than spinning it a bit.

    That said, doubling the rpm squares the stresses on the engine from what I understand.

    But, lugging it creates stresses of another kind, detonation is a possibility and it's harder on bearings.

    Good mileage is not all about slow rpms on the highway, but it helps.

    As you can see, every aspect of running an engine is a two-edged sword that cuts both ways.

    Monitoring a vacuum gauge can help quite a bit.
    I note that my 88 Mustang GT with 5.4 liter and 5-speed would pull a higher vacuum in 4th on long desert highways with their subtle - in some cases - grades.
    Slide the trans up into 5th, vacuum dropped 3"-4".

    Mileage running from point A to point B was 24.5 mpg using 5th during all the moderate grades and flatland running.
    Same route using 4th on the grades returned 25.5 mpg.


    Couple of weeks back, ran the roadster at 3300 rpm - 80 per - and vacuum was about 16"-17" during most of the 60 mile trip.
    Too much rpm though, don't know what the mpg was, we were more interested in getting home after a long hot day than we were in mileage.

    One thing to think about when running elevated rpms for a while is that there's a lot of oil tossed up into the engine valley and under some conditions it can be hard to control.
    You'll know how your oil control system is doing if you nail the throttle after extended high rpm running and get a whole lot of blue smoke.
    Any other time no smoke probs when running through the gears.

    An improvement in oil control will help here, but popping in a set of 3.00 gears in place of the 3.70s will help the most.
     
  24. Tony
    Joined: Dec 3, 2002
    Posts: 7,351

    Tony
    Member

    Here's a link i found while searching the net for formulas.
    Lot's of good formulas here.
    The gear ratio one is what i was searching for.
    The ******** Mustang Drag Racers Forum - Drag Race Calculators and Math Formulas

    I used this when i set up my 53..
    My last 'daily' hot rod ran a slightly warmed over, high mileage 305 and it would cruise all day long right around 2600..that was about 65-70 mph.


    Tony
     
  25. art.resi
    Joined: Oct 15, 2006
    Posts: 214

    art.resi
    Member

    I'm building my 59pu with a 30 over 327 running a t56 and 355s but I dont think I can use 6th (.50 overdrive) even with 25 inch tires. Looking for a set of 411s for my dana 60 then hope to use both overdrives.
     
  26. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,935

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California


    use the carb formula in the link above^^. this is a 305 which will never see the other side of 4,500 RPM. at 5500 max the formula calls for 412.58 CFM. plus I got the carb with a K&N filter in almost new condition for $25.00.
     
  27. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,935

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    ...that's a great link. 23" tires I'll be doing 73 @2200. 26" =79mph..
     
  28. Buzznut
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,349

    Buzznut
    Member

    My Chevy pickup has a 327 running 10.5:1 with 3:2X something rearend and a M22....and IMO I would like to jump up to 3:73's or so. it's hard to get that 327 up on the pipe with such a shallow rearend.

    And the fact that I want to jump up to 29" tires doesn't help too much either...
     
    olscrounger likes this.
  29. Fogger
    Joined: Aug 18, 2007
    Posts: 1,959

    Fogger
    Member

    mph = rpm x tire diameter divided by gear ratio x 336
    rpm = mph x gear ratio x 336 divided by tire diameter
    tire diameter = mph x gear ratio x 336 divided by rpm
    gear ratio = rpm x tire diameter divided by mph x 336
    The FOGGER
     
  30. jhutch
    Joined: Jul 18, 2011
    Posts: 137

    jhutch
    Member

    This is basically the combo that I have in my 62 Bel Air Wagon. I'm about 60 at 2800, 65/3k, 70/3200. As far as I know, it's stock 327. I feel like an O/D would help to bring the RPMs down on the highway. I keep thinking about changing the rear gearing, but the around town acceleration is good so I hate to get too low and kill the performance when not on the highway.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.