Register now to get rid of these ads!

Are There Any Auot Trannys That Bolt To A Ford 223

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by rollin on heels, Jun 6, 2008.

  1. rollin on heels
    Joined: Apr 11, 2008
    Posts: 23

    rollin on heels
    Member

    What Would Be The Best Applacation For My 57 F100 With A Stcok Motor
     
  2. I have one with a Fordomatic in it. That is a 2 speed auto.
    Not sure what later ******s would mate up without an adapter.
     
  3. rollin on heels
    Joined: Apr 11, 2008
    Posts: 23

    rollin on heels
    Member

    Fordomatic Thinkyou I Also Herd About Fmx And A Cruzomatic Ill Try 2 Figur It Out
     
  4. socal57chevy
    Joined: Jun 3, 2008
    Posts: 57

    socal57chevy
    Member

  5. Crankhole
    Joined: Apr 7, 2005
    Posts: 2,644

    Crankhole
    Member

    Really? Curious, how?
     
  6. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,703

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    Since the 223 was made untill 64 I would think there is a C-4 that will bolt up,find a 64 galaxie or custom with the 223 with a automatic and I would think it would be a C-4 since 64 was the first year. It might be hard to find one since it would be a one year trans but there should be some out there. jeff
     
  7. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    Cooter, any trans with a rear pump can be push started. The pump turns with the driveshaft.
    rollin, never seen a 223 with anything but a 2-speed Fordomatic.
     
  8. socal57chevy
    Joined: Jun 3, 2008
    Posts: 57

    socal57chevy
    Member

    +1 ... The rear pump turns and all hydraulic functions work even without the car running allowing you to be pushed, apply low gear, turn the key and voila...the car starts.
    I turned mine into a brush buggy (a really heavy one) then sold it to a kid for a demolition derby, bought it back for $20 and drove it home. This particular trans was tough as woodpecker lips.
    You can also throw that baby in neutral and tow it with all 4 tires on the ground.
     
  9. socal57chevy
    Joined: Jun 3, 2008
    Posts: 57

    socal57chevy
    Member

  10. T-Time
    Joined: Jan 5, 2007
    Posts: 1,627

    T-Time
    Member
    from USA

    The Fordomatic (FX/MX series) is not a two speed transmission. There was a Fordomatic two-speed that came out in the Fairlanes (and maybe Falcons?) circa 1962/63, though. Not the same ******, at all.
     
  11. lewislynn
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,425

    lewislynn
    Member

    My 56 223 has the rear motor mounts on the bell housing. If your 57 is the same wouldn't you need a crossmember for the auto transmission mount?

    I didn't see where anyone said a Fordomatic or a Cruise-o-matic would bolt right up...torque converter and all.
     
  12. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,703

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    Too bad you are so far from me as I just remembered a local junkyard has a 64 custom with a 223 and a automatic trans. Jeff
     
  13. socal57chevy
    Joined: Jun 3, 2008
    Posts: 57

    socal57chevy
    Member

    Not if the donor car used mounts on the bellhousing.

    If the donor had a 215, 223, or 262 the bell housing will (should) pysically bolt to the block. The V-8s seem to be a different bolt pattern. TCs and flywheels should be checked for weights. A custom bent dipstick tube is not too hard to fab. Pay attention to starter orientation, also.

    Another link with fordomatic info...http://www.charlie******.com/2speed.htm
     
  14. d2_willys
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,343

    d2_willys
    Member
    from Kansas

    Fordomatics - two very different versions

    1st version is really a three speed automatic (if you use LO). Normally in Dr the transmission starts in 2nd and shifts to 3rd. Lo is really a 1st gear, and it is possible to start off in 1st when in DR. This is accomplished by depressing the accelerator to the floor hard. The transmission will start in 1st, then shift to 2nd and then 3rd.

    2nd version - 1959-63. This one is really a two speed and was used for 144 and 170 sixes in Falcons, Comets, Fairlanes, and Meteors. It was also used with 221 and 260 V-8s in those cars.

    I believe that all 223 sixes used the 1st version of the Fordomatic, and possibly the Cruiseomatic. I don't think they ever used the 2nd version.

    As far as being used with the C4, it is possible for 1964 in the big cars. But if you think carefully, the bell housing for the 223 and 240/300 sixes are the same I believe. So it may be possible to use C4's and possibly AOD's on the 223.

    You may want to research this information.
     
  15. lewislynn
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,425

    lewislynn
    Member

    As I recall from my youth, any car with an automatic that could be push started would have to get up to about 25 MPH...or maybe it was 15. Anyway You couldn't start them with 2 guys pushing it running down the street like you could with a clutch.

    I do like the idea that the Fordomatic can be towed on all fours. I really do prefer an automatic trans. and I've been thinking of using my F100 as a tow vehicle behind my motorhome.
     
  16. socal57chevy
    Joined: Jun 3, 2008
    Posts: 57

    socal57chevy
    Member

    Mine would fire off at around 10 to 15mph. Parking it on a decent hill was enough.
    Rollin-on-heels, are you bent on a automatic. The more I read, the more I'd go with an original overdrive.
     
  17. lewislynn
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,425

    lewislynn
    Member

    Good luck finding one.
     
  18. socal57chevy
    Joined: Jun 3, 2008
    Posts: 57

    socal57chevy
    Member

    rare, are they?

    See, this is why there are so many fords with 350/350 chevy combos in them. All the cool stuff was crushed cuz it was so crazy heavy or broken beyond repair by racers.
     
  19. Dzus
    Joined: Apr 3, 2006
    Posts: 321

    Dzus
    Member

    The stock F100 223 fordomatic setups are out there. A Ford experienced ****** guy can put a later FMX behind the truck fordomatic bellhousing with the mounting ears. This more commonly done with Y blocks but is the same idea.

    But if your F100 223 is like my F100 223, then every horse wheezed out of it needs to make it to the pavement. I'd stay with a stick. The T86-OD's are out there also. Just make sure you get the truck version with the big input shaft and R11 OD.
     
  20. junkyardjeff
    Joined: Jul 23, 2005
    Posts: 8,703

    junkyardjeff
    Member

    A T-5 might be a better trans to put behind the 223,I put one behind the 235 in my 37 chevuy p/u and with the 2.79 gears it seems to work just fine. Jeff
     
  21. lewislynn
    Joined: Apr 29, 2006
    Posts: 3,425

    lewislynn
    Member

    My long term goal is to use a Clifford cam, 4bbl intake and headers to compensate for the loss of power. My days of wanting to burn the rubber off my tires are over. And shifting isn't fun anymore either.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.