Register now to get rid of these ads!

Life with Nail & Flat head.

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by seesko, Mar 1, 2009.

  1. Just wondering about living with a Buick Nailhead or Ford flatty.
    Just basic stuff. Costs for buying or rebuilding.
    Stuff to look out for that could be a problem. Does running a 5 speed behind the Ford make them more livable on the street? I've read quite a bit about both but just want to get the straight poop on them..:confused:
    I want to build an "A" type roadster pick-up. If I don't go with one of the above engine it'll probably be a small block Ford.

    I've had LOTS of small block Fords. I've ALWAYS been a powerd by Ford guy in the past. Hi po 289s, A Boss 302, Assorted other 302's.
    My 40 Mercury has a Bellybutton 350.
    I know the stigma that goes with the SBC but after having one I "get it". ;)Common as they may be It's pretty hard to beat for just getting in and going. Some day I'd like to put a blue 347 in it but for now the Chev is just fine.:)
    Thanks for any feed back.
     
  2. Fraz
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 1,818

    Fraz
    Member
    from Dixon, MO

    I live with a 401 nailhead every day. Love the torque, love the sound, HATE the gas milage, course my 60 LeSabre is a 5000lb beast and the dynaflow doesn't help, nor my heavy right foot.

    Found what I've needed for it off eBay for reasonable. I am going to tear it down once my income tax gets here and have it bored and balanced, do a lil port work, stick a ST400 behind it with a new rear and new rear suspension, and then proceed to buy new rear tires regularly. Mmmm....burnouts.....lol.
     
  3. Ryan
    Joined: Jan 2, 1995
    Posts: 22,354

    Ryan
    ADMINISTRATOR
    Staff Member

    I personally think that the nailhead and the flathead are two of the best sounding American motors ever... They each take a little maintenance and I guess the nailhead has a better reputation for reliability, but my Tardel built flathead has been absolute joy - easy to service and I've never had anything major issues.
     
  4. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,783

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    Neither is cheap. Both put together right and maintained are reliable. Both sound distinctive. Both look cool.
     
  5. One thing to think about where the OHVs are concerned is that they're built to power heavy cars.

    With the lightweight cars we're involved with OHVs last a long time since they're not working hard in normal driving.

    Half throttle in most of our cars leaves the traffic behind and doesn't make so much noise that it will attract attention from the Gendarmes.

    But . . . you gotta nail the throttle once in a while.

    Just to keep em cleaned out and running good.

    Ya know?;)

    Sure you do....:D
     
  6. kein
    Joined: Oct 28, 2007
    Posts: 199

    kein
    Member

    Both motors would be perfect for your build but I prefer my Nailhead. The rebuild kit was a bit pricey but since the rebuild this thing has been reliable to a fault. I think they look great in old rods too. Just make sure you have a full plan for your build before just slapping it together.
     
  7. I like my Nailhead.
     
  8. Theopwk
    Joined: Sep 29, 2006
    Posts: 99

    Theopwk
    Member
    from Spokane WA

    If its going into a Model A, I say the Nailhead. The sound is like no other and nailheads are very pleasing to the eye when they are all dressed up.
     
  9. 39cent
    Joined: Apr 4, 2006
    Posts: 1,569

    39cent
    Member
    from socal

    the nailhead is all about TORQ. You can put as high a rear gear as you want it wont complain, coupled to a turbo 400 trans [especially a "'switch pitch'" and you have a indestructable tiresmokin beast! they were designed for pulling huge monster Buicks with dynaflow trans. Excellent street engine.
     
  10. Von Dago
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 506

    Von Dago
    Member
    from New Jersey

    If leg room is an issue, and it probably is in a Model A roadster pick-up, you wouldn't have to recess the firewall with the Flathead.
    I don't know about the Nailhead.
     
  11. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,783

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    That's the funny thing. The only difference should be the cost of the parts.
     
  12. thunderbirdesq
    Joined: Feb 15, 2006
    Posts: 7,091

    thunderbirdesq
    Member

    For a sharp cookie machinist anyhow. I know if anything other than a SBC comes into a few shops I know of, the guys will complain, try to talk you out of it, or charge you an astronimical ammount to do the work on it. Weird, you'd think they'd get bored building 383 strokers after a while...
     
  13. zman
    Joined: Apr 2, 2001
    Posts: 16,783

    zman
    Member
    from Garner, NC

    The local guys I use for engine machining ( I assemble them but farm out boring, honing, and stuff like that) don't charge any different for a SBC or a Nailhead. And they do good work. They also refer business to me as well as they don't do complete builds.
     
  14. 35 Woodie
    Joined: Jan 20, 2006
    Posts: 194

    35 Woodie
    Member

    I love both engines. I have a 1946 59A flathead with late 8RT heads and a Thickstun PM-7 in my '35 woodie. And I just finished a 1964 401 nailhead for my deuce hiboy under construction. During the engine build, I found both Carmen Faso in Tonawanda, NY and Russell Martin in CA, www.nailheadbuick.com to be great people to deal with on my nailhead rebuild kit and all the other stuff I needed. They have forgotten more than I will ever know about nailheads. Carmen and Russell make this hobby fun!!:D

    [​IMG]
     
  15. dirthawker1313
    Joined: Apr 18, 2005
    Posts: 647

    dirthawker1313
    Member

    my rebuilt flathead cost me 1700 bucks.. its totally stock. damn shame its been sitting on an engine stand for over 2 years.. maybe one day ill actually use it..
     
  16. Well YEAH! Ya gotta do that. :cool:
     
  17. HEATHEN
    Joined: Nov 22, 2005
    Posts: 8,947

    HEATHEN
    Member
    from SIDNEY, NY

    In my opinion, a nailhead gives you the advantages of a vintage look as well as the advantages that most modern engines have over flatheads. Even a stock 322 will put more power to the rear wheels than anything but the most radical (and very pricey) flathead, and speed equipment is still quite prevalent for them.
     
  18. Good information and great looking Buick. I got wood too. :D
    Thanks
     
  19. This has been very helpful. I appriciate all the positive input and inside dope on these engines.
    Street Rodder had a really good series about the Nailhead a few years ago that really got my attention. I do like the "look" of them too. But then the flat head is soooo cool too.
    Thanks guys.
     
  20. R.Allan
    Joined: Sep 28, 2008
    Posts: 412

    R.Allan
    BANNED
    from Ca

    ive got a 401 goin in the sedan.
     
  21. kruizin
    Joined: Jan 23, 2009
    Posts: 41

    kruizin
    Member

    Well my flatty has been running strong for 20 years, it still has the Mercomatic hooked up, its been shootin flames and I never let up when travelin around. All I have ever done to it is screw around with the carb tring different set ups and put a alternator..It has made me look good since day one..and nail heads they just keep going, lots still out there being used..
     
  22. I just picked up my 3rd flattie a few weeks back. I wanted a builder and got this for $200. It has the desirable 2 piece truck bell housing and a giant boat anchor 4 speed with PTO attachement. Won't use the tranny. Plan to build it into a mild street engine and hook it with a T-5 for the roadster project that now has a stock flattie. Hope to get this car on the road and then swap engines. This new engine is not a runner and we started the teardown this weekend - man is it gunked up! Came outa a '52 (?) COE truck. Try to get it dipped soon to see what we got to work with. I've had a stock flattie in my '36 sedan for over 20 years - its always been reliable what little I drive it. Hope to build this new one using modern water pumps, electron. ignition, etc.
     
  23. DrewDay
    Joined: Oct 24, 2007
    Posts: 249

    DrewDay
    Member
    from Austin, Tx

    Theyre both definately beautiful engines
     
  24. 39cent
    Joined: Apr 4, 2006
    Posts: 1,569

    39cent
    Member
    from socal

    the only rod I rode in that could pull the front wheels off the ground was a rag tag beast of a model A coupe powered by a 56 nailhead
     
  25. repoguy
    Joined: Jul 27, 2002
    Posts: 2,085

    repoguy
    Member

    My Riviera was a daily driver for 2 years and I never had the slightest of issues. Ran like a top.
     
  26. mow too much
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 906

    mow too much
    Member

    This is the reason I would like to use a nailhead the look is to neat for words, and getting wood at 56 dosn't happen on just anything. :D
     
  27. I have two nail heads. One is a stock 322. the other is a 401 with weiand 2x4 intake and valve covers. I am temped to install the 401 in a tri five chev. Their torque was so good that chev factory installed 322 engines in the truck tractors in 1956:eek:. The nailhead is quite narrow in with and will easily fit in most engine bays. I prefer mine with a stick shift. Flatheads are good also but it is hard to find a block that isnt cracked. You also need a very good cooling system with a flathead. I think the cost would be about the same for either engine. OldWolf
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.