Register now to get rid of these ads!

Track style or more traditional approach

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Iceman7578, Nov 24, 2009.

  1. Iceman7578
    Joined: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 82

    Iceman7578
    Member

    Looking for opinions. I have a 23 T body a 31 grille and a 49 flathead. Want to start the buildup but dont know if I want to ditch the 31 grille and go for a track nose or keep it and go with a more traditional approach. I know its all personal preference but what do you guys think? Maybe some pics would help. Thanks everyone!
     
  2. irace2win41
    Joined: Jan 19, 2009
    Posts: 120

    irace2win41
    Member

    The December 2009 copy of Streetroder pages 54-58 had a great review of T's in different forms. I don't have the pictures but I like them both with the track T nose or a early 28-29 nose. Good luck and post some pictures of your project.

    Rod
     
  3. shadetreerodder
    Joined: Aug 4, 2006
    Posts: 291

    shadetreerodder
    Member

    Track style. That is what I would do with it. They are too cool. Just my yhought but you do whatever makes you happy cause it will be your car.
     
  4. SUHRsc
    Joined: Sep 27, 2005
    Posts: 5,098

    SUHRsc
    Member

    do some research on the actual "dirt track" roadsters.... an awful lot of then ran a model-T through 32 grill shell with the front suspension infront of it....

    I've always kinda wanted to have one in that style, myself.....
     
  5. Track-T
    Joined: Feb 25, 2003
    Posts: 366

    Track-T
    Member

    Here's my '27...
     

    Attached Files:

  6. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,847

    -Brent-
    Member

    Post some pics of it...

    I didn't know about that Street Rodder, it sounds interesting, is that issue on news stands now?
     
  7. pasadenahotrod
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 11,772

    pasadenahotrod
    Member
    from Texas

    Track nosed cars look best when they have the engine covered.
    Just adding a track nose without a hood leaves a visual with something missing.
     
  8. Chili Phil
    Joined: Jan 15, 2004
    Posts: 7,597

    Chili Phil
    Member

    That's exactly right. Form follows function. A track nose is only PART of the streamlining.
     
  9. 50Fraud
    Joined: May 6, 2001
    Posts: 10,099

    50Fraud
    Member Emeritus

    Personally, I think '23s look best with T radiator shells:

    [​IMG]
     
  10. OoltewahSpeedShop
    Joined: Oct 18, 2007
    Posts: 3,103

    OoltewahSpeedShop
    Member

  11. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,788

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    I like the trackstyle, but as mentioned, in order to complete the picture you should run a hood and sides. They were ment to be wind cheaters.
     
  12. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,788

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    Damn, I love that T.
     
  13. Track-T
    Joined: Feb 25, 2003
    Posts: 366

    Track-T
    Member

    Seems to me, if it has a stock type nose it would be of a modified then
    a "track style" car.
    Nothing wrong with modified, but it doesn't have the "race" look to them
     
  14. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,847

    -Brent-
    Member

    I guess it really depends on the type of race car.
     
  15. weez
    Joined: Dec 5, 2002
    Posts: 860

    weez
    Member

    "Track T" is its functional intent, it could be high tech or traditional or whatever, right? My fave is the Rico Squaglia T.
     
  16. Ebert
    Joined: Feb 13, 2006
    Posts: 1,920

    Ebert
    Member
    from Keller, TX

    Instead, I would go with a "Lakes" version.....get ahold of some Don Montgomery books and do the research. You will probably find both '32 grilles and track noses and it matters what you do with the rest of it! Give 'em hell!
    E
     
  17. Go your own way, it's your car and you are obligated to give it your own signature, but this is one fine looking T........
     
  18. Track-T
    Joined: Feb 25, 2003
    Posts: 366

    Track-T
    Member

    No argument from me, It's up to you and your tastes.
    and yes it is a fine looking car...
     
  19. oldebob
    Joined: Oct 21, 2008
    Posts: 782

    oldebob
    Member
    from Spokane WA

    You are wise to consider this before starting the build. To me a track nose needs to be part of a concept right from the start. The Mack T is a good example . In silhouette the car flows perfectly. As far as history goes, very few real traditional Track Roadsters actually had "track noses" .
     
  20. sota
    Joined: Oct 14, 2006
    Posts: 717

    sota
    Member

    Here are the two styles side by side. The model A grill shell was narrowed about 4 inches.I agree with others if your running a track nose then you need to run a full hood for the right look.
    [​IMG]
     
  21. chop&drop
    Joined: Oct 11, 2006
    Posts: 684

    chop&drop
    Member

    sota -

    Two VERY nice T's. Both styles are "perfect".
     
  22. sota
    Joined: Oct 14, 2006
    Posts: 717

    sota
    Member

    Thanks chop&drop!
     
  23. Turbo26T
    Joined: May 19, 2004
    Posts: 1,260

    Turbo26T
    Member

    SOTA: Thats a coupla killer T's . What w/shield posts were used on the T w/ A grille ?
    Thanks,
    Stan
     
  24. sota
    Joined: Oct 14, 2006
    Posts: 717

    sota
    Member

    Thanks STAN!!! They are 27 Ford chop about 2 inches or so.
     
  25. lugnutz9032
    Joined: Nov 22, 2008
    Posts: 264

    lugnutz9032
    Member
    from Palatka,Fl

    "Go with a more traditional approach"?(Para-phrased)Track T's are just as traditional.I'd say close your eyes and picture the car you want.Whatever pops into your head first is what you go with.You're the only one you have to please.
     
  26. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,847

    -Brent-
    Member

    There's a lot of info out there, so I've learned. I came across this photo and it reminded me of your combo. Not exactly sure on the grill other than early thirties, looks like it could be Chevy. None-the-less, it's very similar.
     

    Attached Files:

  27. 50Fraud
    Joined: May 6, 2001
    Posts: 10,099

    50Fraud
    Member Emeritus

    That's a great looking pair, Sota; they look like brothers. Are they both yours, or were they built together? What's powering them?
     
  28. sota
    Joined: Oct 14, 2006
    Posts: 717

    sota
    Member

    Thanks 50Fraud!!
    No I built the Mutt Special and my friend Chris Staneck built the other one. I started mine and he got to close to it and you all know what happens next!So yes they were built somewhat together.They are both powered on 2.3 Ford Ranger blocks and upgraded from there.
     
  29. Iceman7578
    Joined: May 24, 2007
    Posts: 82

    Iceman7578
    Member

    Sota- I definitely like the T with the track nose on the right. I think the lines and proportions are perfect.

    Brent- That pic is great! Thats what I pictured when I said "more traditional". I really dig that early 30's lakes look!

    Thanks for the replies everyone
     
  30. zzford
    Joined: May 5, 2005
    Posts: 1,822

    zzford
    Member

    Hey, Sota! Knock out roadsters! And two of 'em to boot! 'Course, I've always been a ****er for a nice pair.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.