Register now to get rid of these ads!

So-Cal DMV

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by 57tony31, Jan 1, 2010.

  1. 57tony31
    Joined: Jul 20, 2008
    Posts: 632

    57tony31
    Member
    from Woods

    Just reading my new SEMA "Driving Force". Looks like Big Brother DMV is at it again. Begginning today, DMV sez if you lied on the ***le application for your '32 Ford roadster, you have until December 31, 2010 to fess up or face up to a $4000 fine plus they take your ***le. If ya fess up this year, you will fall into the "Amnesty catagory". What if a Californian bought a turn key '33 from Virginia with a '33 Ford Virginia ***le ?

    The SoCal '32 Roadster got a GM Green LS3 engine, $7,900 plus $5K to install. If you Rod will not p*** emmisions, ya gotta go this route.....duh ?

    Does this mean Cal DMV will be doing door knocks with "Rod experts" in hand ??

    Cal needs bucks...broke again. But looks like they will run the Street Rod industry & hobby out of the State. What will Jay Leno do ??


    Accordimng to the CHP, they not only will take your ***le, if you have bogus vin# they can send your car to the crusher and you might end up in jail. There is going to be a conversion kit also available that consists mainly of elect. fuel injection with exhaust and cats. Also a smog legal grate engine you can buy for GM. Its not cheap either. I'm sure glad I got the smog exemption now but if I build another one it sure won't be in sunny So.Cal.:eek::eek:
     
  2. poofus1929
    Joined: Jan 29, 2008
    Posts: 897

    poofus1929
    Member
    from So Cal

    That's just more inspiration to get the hell out of this ****py over-taxed, over-priced state. California ****s.
     
  3. SlmLrd
    Joined: Oct 27, 2007
    Posts: 999

    SlmLrd
    Member
    from DAGO

    What the hell are you still doing here? Complaining?

    Move to the midwest and complain about the snow.
     
  4. 61TBird
    Joined: Mar 16, 2008
    Posts: 2,641

    61TBird
    Member

    That's one less complainer.
    How many others can you take with you??
     
  5. stuart in mn
    Joined: Nov 22, 2007
    Posts: 2,785

    stuart in mn
    Member

    I guess that means if you didn't lie on your ***le application you're ok. Seems simple enough to me.
     
  6. banditomerc
    Joined: Dec 18, 2005
    Posts: 2,515

    banditomerc
    Member

    California...Love,or leave it...and don't come back,more room for us!
     
  7. Special Ed
    Joined: Nov 1, 2007
    Posts: 8,661

    Special Ed
    Member

    If you broke the law, it will cost you. Fraud is a no-no. Maybe Missouri has no laws?
     
  8. outlaw256
    Joined: Jun 26, 2008
    Posts: 2,022

    outlaw256
    Member

    ive always wanted to open a hot rod shop in s. ca. but thats the main reason i wont. more damn car and bike laws than is reasonable.god i love the south.we can pretty much do what we want to a hot rod or bike and the law mostly dont mess with ya.ive been stop in the last ten yrs at least 2 dozen times and yet to be gien a ticket. no plates, taillite or headlite out and even speeding. and most times it was to just look at the car.have always been told to take her home.
     
  9. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,788

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    So... people cheat the system, get caught and then get pissed?:confused: Seems like if you take the risk, you have to take the payout. Good or bad.
     
  10. Special Ed
    Joined: Nov 1, 2007
    Posts: 8,661

    Special Ed
    Member

    Exactly...There are consequences to your actions. :)
     
  11. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,522

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Yup, and all of the ***le and VIN related shenanigans are felonies.

    As far as I am concerned, if you are willing to commit a felony to have a car on the road, I don't want you in my state, my hobby, or my business.

    You will ruin it for everyone.
     
  12. Rich Wright
    Joined: Jan 9, 2008
    Posts: 3,918

    Rich Wright

    The only problem with the complainers leaving CA is that Nevada is right next door.... They're most likely just gonna come here and complain about life here:D

    I've never understood why it's such a bad thing to ***le and register a car for what it is...... Unless it's a question of shame or embarr***ment.

    Or... What???? Is it to avoid smog requirements? It's pretty easy to use a vintage engine, if that's what the issue is..???..
     
  13. Mazooma1
    Joined: Jun 5, 2007
    Posts: 13,545

    Mazooma1
    Member

    Gee, I've always had legally registered hot rods since 1966. Look at all the drama I've missed out on by doing things in a legal and honest way!!!
     
  14. VonWegener
    Joined: Nov 19, 2009
    Posts: 786

    VonWegener
    Member

    I like the hard core at***ude - BUT what the new law means is that every car built with a custom frame is now in violation of the law.
    Be it American Stamping rails or a homemade T-bucket frame. This is, if strictly enforced, disastrous for the owners and ch***is builders in Cali.
    We are not supposed to get political here but now would be a good time to contact your local politician and get this overturned.
     
  15. banditomerc
    Joined: Dec 18, 2005
    Posts: 2,515

    banditomerc
    Member

    Maybe someone on here can access the exact wording of the statute in question,then we can get someone on here to put it into plain english then we can?..
     
  16. Special Ed
    Joined: Nov 1, 2007
    Posts: 8,661

    Special Ed
    Member

    That is completely incorrect. Check your facts, please. SEMA is comprised of the guys that build and sell those ch***is. They worked with the DMV to get this done. :)
     
  17. Hot Rod Michelle
    Joined: May 3, 2007
    Posts: 1,620

    Hot Rod Michelle
    Member

    Easy, easy..... if you don't like it, then lead the way out. Don't let the door knob hit you on your way out.;)
     
    Last edited: Jan 1, 2010
  18. 2002p51
    Joined: Oct 27, 2004
    Posts: 1,362

    2002p51
    Member

    ***le issues aside, the way I think the law is written is that if you have a "new construction" vehicle (i.e., Brookeville body, TCI frame, etc) that you are registering (honestly) for the first time, unless you're lucky enough to be first in line for one of those 500 smog exemptions, you must then install that "official state approved" GM crate engine and cats at nearly $13,000!

    And that's the only way you will p*** smog and get your ***le. Is that right?
     
  19. chuckw2
    Joined: Feb 11, 2007
    Posts: 143

    chuckw2
    Member
    from So Cal

    from the SEMA website:


    http://www.semasan.com/main/main.aspx?id=62654
     
  20. VonWegener
    Joined: Nov 19, 2009
    Posts: 786

    VonWegener
    Member

    It is very simple. If you change the frame on a car the car becomes legaly a "Special Construction" vehicle and all smog laws pertaining to the year the frame was built will apply. Cali does not have a engine year smog law.
    So if you bought a black plate 32 Ford in 1966 and in 1998 updated the car to a TCI ch***is you would have needed to reregister your car as a 1998 Special Construction. If you did not do that this new law will give authorities the right to make you pay and eventually take your car away.
    If you bought a 31 coupe and channeled it over a homemade frame and licensed the car as a 31 Ford you are in violation of the law and you need to reregister as a 2009 Special construction.
    How many cars in Cali run around on custom frames? The DMV is going to be fat with cash when this is over.
     
  21. billygoat67
    Joined: Jul 13, 2007
    Posts: 341

    billygoat67
    Member

    i agree , get the whole law, post it and mabe a lawer type will tell you what exactly it means. in real english.
    i'm shure there is a few on here.
     
  22. Special Ed
    Joined: Nov 1, 2007
    Posts: 8,661

    Special Ed
    Member

    That is again, incorrect.
     
  23. Special Ed
    Joined: Nov 1, 2007
    Posts: 8,661

    Special Ed
    Member

    We've been through this several times on here. Please do a search, as this is a waste of time to be so redundant. The sky is NOT falling, kids...:)
     
  24. chuckw2
    Joined: Feb 11, 2007
    Posts: 143

    chuckw2
    Member
    from So Cal

    sounds like a money-maker for someone.

    How much should I expect to pay for the “retrofit” kit? How much should I expect to pay for the GM engine and powertrain?

    "The retrofit kit is a collection of emissions-related parts with specifications developed by SEMA for which a variety of aftermarket manufacturers will be able to supply components. On average, the kit should cost approximately $6,000. The labor to install the package will likely cost an additional $5,000. If you choose to use a new engine and powertrain package from GM, the current LS3 package will retail at an estimated $7,900. GM will also offer a number of other emissions-approved engine packages with a variety of performance options and price levels. Estimated installation cost for the GM system is approximately $6,000."
     
  25. Hot Rod Michelle
    Joined: May 3, 2007
    Posts: 1,620

    Hot Rod Michelle
    Member

    You guys all realize, that certain builders, (not to Boyd mention any Coddington names mind you), but certain builders made it a habbit to build new aluminum or fibergl*** cars and consistantly p*** them off as original Ford tin. As a result, the legislature has had no choice, but to stop this *******ization of the smog and vehicle codes and laws. So, there you have it. It is necessary to create law that stops the bad guys. If you're a bad guy, then get right with the law. End of discussion.
     
  26. VonWegener
    Joined: Nov 19, 2009
    Posts: 786

    VonWegener
    Member

    Tell me what is incorrect about this. The law about custom frames has been on the books forever. Since the eighties if I remember correctly. It is illegal to stamp VIN numbers into frames. How can you legally take your 31 coupe on a custom frame to the DMV and not be a Special Construction?
    You used to get away with calling it a 31 but those days are now over.
    I hope that your Muntz sits on an original frame...
     
  27. Special Ed
    Joined: Nov 1, 2007
    Posts: 8,661

    Special Ed
    Member

    No it doesn't. There was no part of the frame that was salvagable. It is a custom frame. I own two cars with custom frames, and they are both ***led and registered as to the year of the body that sits on them, with their VIN's intact, and they are both legal and have been verified by the California Highway Patrol. :) OK, I need to get back out to my garage now, and finish putting my motor back together...
     
  28. krylon32
    Joined: Jan 29, 2006
    Posts: 10,794

    krylon32
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Nebraska

    Been putting beans on the table for almost 30 years building custom 32/48 Ford ch***is, maybe my time is coming to an end. I will be loading a Brookville 32 pkg car on a transport heading for CA. within the hour. ?????????????????
     
  29. VonWegener
    Joined: Nov 19, 2009
    Posts: 786

    VonWegener
    Member

    These verifications are what is being questioned now. We all enjoyed a certain leeway when it came to registering our cars. Instead of grandfathering all cars built before 2010 this fascist law is retroactive and I would not be surprised if in the future there will be payouts to informants who turn us scofflaws in...
     
  30. Hot Rod Michelle
    Joined: May 3, 2007
    Posts: 1,620

    Hot Rod Michelle
    Member

    As California goes, so goes the rest of the nation.:p
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.