Register now to get rid of these ads!

Barn Job #18, '10 Build Thread.

Discussion in 'HA/GR' started by Old6rodder, Jan 22, 2010.

  1. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    HA/GR #18 '10 build thread
    Link to '09 build thread.
    Link to '07/'08 build thread.

    Name: "Barn Job #18" (Build photos link)
    Status: Racing
    Team: "Geezerspeed"

    [​IMG]

    Engine: '60 225" Chrysler "slant" six
    Carbs: three HIF6 SUs
    Gearbox: '62 Valiant 3 sp.
    Rear end: '62 Valiant 7.25", 4.10>1
    Wheelbase: 124"
    ET: 12.941
    MPH: 105.50

    Records:
    '07 first mid engine HA/GR.
    '07 first running HA/GR, left coast.
    '08 winner, 1st HA/GR (unofficial) "meet", left coast.
    '08 quickest HA/GR, left coast.
    '08 fastest HA/GR, left coast.
    '09 2nd place, ANRA I Open Wheel cl***.
    '09 1st place, ANRA II HA/GR sub meet.
    '09 2nd place, ANRA II Open Wheel cl***.
    '09 1st 12 sec HA/GR run, left coast.
    '10 First two left coast HA/GR clutch explosions, ANRA I. :rolleyes:
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2011
  2. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    Well kiddies,

    We made it to 2010, with 2009 "in the books". What a year that was. :D

    I've once again survived the Rose Parade and spent most of January recuperating, catching up on work & home maintainance and keeping our heads above the waterline this year.
    Still, I've managed to find a little time to tickle the HAMBster a bit as well. :cool:

    Failing to locate an available rear sump (pick up truck) oil pan last year, I gave up and re-cobbled a spare 987 (mid-sump) one I had on the shelf. I moved the sump back of course, added a rear baffle and relocated the dipstick tube to the side of the pan. Next up; stretching the oil pick-up tube to fit.

    Following that we'll make the spacers for the new rear wheels we got last year and finally mount'em up.

    Then it'll be a full tear down for some minor ch***is re-engineering and hopefully some weight reduction. We'll touch up the paint then too.

    Lastly (if we can get a few more "round tuits"), a proper cooling system & temp gauge, an oil pressure idiot light and a cam cut specifically for our set-up. Some of these may have to wait for later in the season.

    Russ is finished with his surgeries and recuperating in Palm Springs ........ bored out of his skull. :rolleyes:
    He'll likely be back aboard by mid year. And likely ready to race, ya think? :D
    And he still weighs 50+ lbs less than I do. ;)

    I'm also still way behind on the photo album but will try to get it caught up this month.
     
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2010
  3. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    Looking forward to seeing the results of your efforts...gonna have to start crackin' so we can stage with you this year.;)
     
  4. Toymaker
    Joined: Mar 26, 2006
    Posts: 3,924

    Toymaker
    Member
    from Fresno,CA

    You better "Start Crackin'", we need a full field this year at Eagle Field:D Notice I didn't say which event as I thought I'd be kind! Rocky
     
  5. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    Thank you for your continued support...we don't know which event either, but plan giving it our best shot.:p
     
  6. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    One with a drag race? :D

    Tom, I'll likely make it over next week. :cool:
     
  7. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    I'll likely be here. :cool:
     
  8. Toymaker
    Joined: Mar 26, 2006
    Posts: 3,924

    Toymaker
    Member
    from Fresno,CA

    HaHaHaHa! The boys with the straight 8 picked up a manual trans set-up, look out. Rocky
     
  9. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    cool!!
     
  10. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    OK kiddies, I finally updated the build album.

    I got around to putting'er on a diet this year but won't know how much she shed 'til I can get'er to a scale. Looking for 100 lbs but likely'll only get close to it.
    Also spiffied up the front end a bit and will leave the new carb stacks on (they work! :D).

    When the engine goes back together it'll be with a bit better cam, a bit more off the head and a bit more off the weight there too.

    Other than that we're adding the L78 Cokers we bought last season, and that's about it. Hoping to keep'er in the 12s and have fun drivin'er. :cool:

    Here's one of the new pics .....

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2010
  11. bobw
    Joined: Mar 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,376

    bobw
    Member

    Thanks for the update, ****. You are showing what can be achieved with a slant without shoveling tons of money into it. Good luck this season.
     
  12. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    You da man!!:D

    The "hole" world of HA/GR bows down to you!!:p
     
  13. Toymaker
    Joined: Mar 26, 2006
    Posts: 3,924

    Toymaker
    Member
    from Fresno,CA

    The "God Father" of HA/GR's
     
  14. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    Thanks Bob, that's where the fun is for me.


    No Rocky, I drilled each and every one of these holes with a drill, not a Thompson. :D
     
    Last edited: Mar 31, 2010
  15. nexxussian
    Joined: Mar 14, 2007
    Posts: 3,237

    nexxussian
    Member

    Aw, c-mon, the Thompson would have put the reinforcing flanges in all at the same time.:D
     
  16. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    For the size of them holes he would have had to use a 105.:D
     
  17. nexxussian
    Joined: Mar 14, 2007
    Posts: 3,237

    nexxussian
    Member


    This is true, but you might have secondary distortion "issues".:eek: :D
     
  18. I like all the updates, however.....how much 'flex' is there in the front end? from this side of the pond it looks like you have removed a dramatic amount of steel from both the split bones and the axle, and whilst I appreciate that the core 'structural' elements remain, the length of those slots concerns me, especially given the kind of speeds you're going to be reaching....am I over reacting, how is it in the flesh? any details on the shortened box and electric motor used on the water pump?

    Cheers,

    Drewfus
     
  19. ThingyM
    Joined: Sep 4, 2006
    Posts: 812

    ThingyM
    Member

    I've been using a Ford heater motor on the waterpump since day one.And BobW also put one on his..I got mine belted with a 4-1 ratio. Adds about another 5 hp to the motor..
     
  20. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    Howdy Drewfus,

    Sorry, I'll need to take a couple paragraphs for a proper explanation.

    Our front end is (functionally) an unequal length four link system with a bit of give in the joints as well, not the rigid bones design it appears to be.

    Bone loadings;
    Ford's solid mounted design relied on an intact wishbone, which rodders typically defeat by "splitting the bones". This then torsionally loads both the bones and the axle in a way Ford never intended and just chaffs the hell out of the engineer in me. It looks cool ...... but.
    I have our bones set up to actually work as links (using flexible attachments at the axle ends in addition to the ch***is ends) so that the joints take the movements as I've designed. They're weaker torsionally of course but no longer recieve any torsional loading.

    Their beam strength is near original as the slots do not intrude on the arch portion of the oblong cross section. Thus the upper and lower chords are untouched, they're actually well over strength for their new function.

    Spring loadings;
    The spring loops (tips) are rubber sleeved like the bone's axle ends to allow for a bit of compression. This effectively eliminates the minor torsional loading inherent in unequal link layouts applied to limited travel designs.

    Axle loadings;
    It's torsional resistance is way down of course, particularly from the two slots outboard of the bone mounts. However there are no front brakes in my application, thus inducing no brake torsional load to the axle in the first place. The free mounting of the bones also eliminates any torsional loading to the axle from them as well.

    Again, the top and bottom chords are unmolested, leaving the beam strength near original.

    Weight loading;
    Pretty much self explanatory in a dedicated drag racer, nowhere near what the equipment's originally designed for.
    Not so, the other end of the car, and you'll notice the rear bones fully unmolested in spite of the fact that they're only taking compression & tension loads, no torsional at all. :D

    I've been asked this before, but I've not before explianed it, merely responded that this is a strip only build, and only a fool would try it on the street. This in an admitted effort to keep neophytes from doing ill considered things.

    The short gearbox is working well. The early output shaft has enough meat to allow re-splining for a later style slip joint after shortening. There after it's but a matter of shortening a later rear housing (with seal) to fit.
    The original rear bushing's pretty much a sinecure, so the actual rear box bearing carries the load as the factory intended.

    The original early ball & trunion joint could be done the same I expect, as the trunion plate was splined onto the output shaft as well. There'd be a bit of extra machining in the Jesus nut threads of course but it'd be perfectly do-able.

    The electric motor for the pump is in an after market kit sold by Mr. Gasket, but it appears to be nothing more than a heater blower motor adapted to the service, the toothed belt & pulleys being the big deal. This is their cheapest kit, the injection molded pump end pulley doesn't fit the belt very well and I had to nobble the bracket a fair bit (it's designed for V8s). Still, it works.
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2010
  21. Thanks, appreciate the feed back, as your explanation was both informative, and explanitory for your application.

    Have you weighed the car lately?

    Cheers,

    Drewfus:)
     
  22. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    Not yet, some annoying customers interrupted putting the engine back in with actual work. :D It'll be a few more days before I can get back to it.

    Forgive the pun but now it'll be a race to get'er back together for the 18th.
     
  23. bobw
    Joined: Mar 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,376

    bobw
    Member

    What? You engineered the changes to your car? There oughta be a law against that sort of thing.:)
     
  24. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    He's been backyard engineering since the early 60s if not before, (I've only known him since the early 60s so I can't go back any farther) and some of his engineering still amazes me.

    If you think the Barn Job is interesting...you should see some of the stuff he makes that is hidden beneath all of the flowers on the Sierra Madre Rose Parade Float!
     
  25. bobw
    Joined: Mar 24, 2006
    Posts: 2,376

    bobw
    Member

    The only reason I teased **** is cuz I know he's good.:)
     
  26. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    :D

    Easy gentlemen, if this sort of stuff goes to my head I could decide to run for public office.

    THEN you'd be sorry ........ :rolleyes:

    I think the site (perhaps all sites) needs a decent "tongue in cheek" icon. :cool:
     
  27. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    Either that or a good "foot in mouth" icon.:p
     
  28. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    Ran into some unusual problems putting the new engine back together and am having to have a couple parts modified to fit. Still plan to make the ANRA opener but now it'll take a few midnighters to do it.

    Cross your fingers gentlemen.
     
  29. Old6rodder
    Joined: Jun 20, 2006
    Posts: 2,546

    Old6rodder
    Member
    from SoCal

    Well, I've gotten'er all back together (pending the new back wheels' spacers) but with no time to do more than fire'er up in the garage we'll be an unknwn quan***y for the ANRA opener.

    I believe I got close to 100 lbs off'er (and 10 off myself :rolleyes:), hope to weigh'er at the meet.
    Other than that, just a new bump stick this year.

    Didn't get to port out the manifold like I wanted, that flywheel and clutch thing ate up the play time I'd allowed for it. I'll get to it later in the season.

    We're finally getting a smarter camera, so I hope to have some better pictures to add to the album as well.

    See you all after the meet.
     
  30. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,434

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    Go fast...go quick...smile a lot!! We'll be there in spirit, say hi to the gang for us.:D
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.