Register now to get rid of these ads!

Anyone use an Essex,or other oddball frame under their Model A?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by STUKA, Apr 3, 2010.

  1. STUKA
    Joined: Apr 14, 2004
    Posts: 393

    STUKA
    Member

    I have a 30-31 "Coupe" project going,and a guy nearby has an early Es*** frame for really cheap($75,cheaper than buying steel).

    I was thinking I could use it,since it has a rear kickup and front "horns" already,and with my Model A front and rear crossmembers welded in it would look better than a tube frame.I know Id have to shorten the wheelbase,which is why Id use my crossmembers.Just looking for anyone else who has done anything similar..

    Mind you,Im cheap,I hate the look of 2x4 tubing,the car will be channeled,and Ill be running a 330 Olds.Thoughts?
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2010
  2. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,496

    The37Kid
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    You would be better off offering the Es*** ch***is to someone who plans to build a vintage dirt track car. That was the ch***is to start with back in the day. Please post a photo of it.
     
  3. STUKA
    Joined: Apr 14, 2004
    Posts: 393

    STUKA
    Member

    I dont own it yet..If I buy it,Ill put up pics I guess.The guy did mention that they were the bee's knees in the late '30's..
     
  4. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    I wouldn't use the es*** frame. I'm surprised you can't find a original Model A ch***is.
     
  5. STUKA
    Joined: Apr 14, 2004
    Posts: 393

    STUKA
    Member

    Thanks for the input,but as a matter of fact,I have 2 Model A frames. I want something more substantial for the Olds engine,and something that has a kick up to lower it.
    Rather than going to all the trouble of boxing and Z-ing a Model A frame,or building a new frame,I want something that looks old,and is beefier.Therefore,I was looking for ideas from anyone who has used anything OTHER THAN A MODEL A FRAME,OR NEW STEEL TUBING.
    Hope that clarifies things.
     
  6. Hot Rod Michelle
    Joined: May 3, 2007
    Posts: 1,620

    Hot Rod Michelle
    Member

    Well, for what its worth, my Model-A is sitting on a '37 Ford frame and it looks killer. I would use that Es*** frame if I were you. Could be really cool. And if not, then you switch the body out with a roadster turttle deck T and build a modified tracker.
     
    Last edited: Apr 3, 2010
  7. They are good looking frames. you cant see it but the Neikamp roadster has one.
     
  8. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    awe I see. I have no clue what the es*** frame looks like. But I now understand what you're thinking. Good idea. I picked up a 42-47 f1 pickup frame for free last week. I got it for the trans crossmember. Now that I have been staring at it for awhile I have had a few similar ideas. It has a kick up in the rear. I was thinking about using part of it to step the rear of my A frame. But I am still leaning towards just stacking another one on top.
     
  9. STUKA
    Joined: Apr 14, 2004
    Posts: 393

    STUKA
    Member

    I saw that in the R&C article when it was restored in the 70's..I never could tell either,which is what Im going for.BTW,didn't Niekamp HAND FILE all the welds,since he didnt own a grinder? Something like that.********!
     
  10. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    so, a Es*** frame is traditional? an I thought you were going to get chewed out for building outside "the code";)
     
  11. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,496

    The37Kid
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Everything was cut with a hacksaw, not a torch. He believed that made for stronger, joints and chrome plating came out better. Funny how you remember things like that from an article you read 30+ years ago. :)
     
  12. Very traditional but as stated more widely used by guys building what we would later call sprint cars.
     
  13. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    you two and a few others make it painfully apparent how much I have to learn.

    to the OP. I think you should go for it!
     
  14. Read,study,research LOTS!
    Most of us were not there so that and actually doing/recreating is all we can do to learn.
     
  15. STUKA
    Joined: Apr 14, 2004
    Posts: 393

    STUKA
    Member

    "The code" can **** it. An Es***,or any other vintage frame,is a lot cooler than anything these Jesse James wanna-be's can make up with 20 feet of tubing at his job at Oil Can Henry's. (Insert lame job ***le here..)
     
  16. STUKA
    Joined: Apr 14, 2004
    Posts: 393

    STUKA
    Member

    Ahh..I knew it was something along those lines..And,unfortunately,it was only 10 years ago that I read it..I wasnt even hatched in 1970!!
     
  17. Hot Rod Michelle
    Joined: May 3, 2007
    Posts: 1,620

    Hot Rod Michelle
    Member

    Ok....... So, which is it?:confused: Make up your mind. Sheesh.... and they say women are indecisive.
     
  18. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    Well, I'm trying. If you guys knew the difference in how I would build a car when I joined the hamb and now......:eek:

    Yeah there is something cool about 80 year old formed steel that can never be captured in rectangular steel tubing. I think it's called soul... I really hope you grab that frame now, I'm super interested to see this happen.
     
  19. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    at first it sounded like an abortion in the making. but I did some google searching. looks like a cool frame.


    Btw, I didn't know we weren't allowed to change our opinions.
     
  20. Hot Rod Michelle
    Joined: May 3, 2007
    Posts: 1,620

    Hot Rod Michelle
    Member

    Its not that one isn't allowed to change their stance or opinion, its just that, when someone comes up with a different idea about doing something, everyone else is so quick to pooh pooh on it.;)

    You know..... I'm just saying.
     
  21. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    Yeah, I understand. I wasn't trying to pooh pooh on it. I just had a very different idea of what the frame looked like and I thought he was having trouble finding a Model A frame. He clarified and my viewpoint changed.
     
  22. Hot Rod Michelle
    Joined: May 3, 2007
    Posts: 1,620

    Hot Rod Michelle
    Member

    No worries.... we're all better now. Thanks for the clarification.:)
     
  23. HotRodFreak
    Joined: Mar 25, 2005
    Posts: 1,935

    HotRodFreak
    Member

    Es*** frames are *****EN! Nothing new and real old skool.
     
  24. Hitchhiker
    Joined: May 1, 2008
    Posts: 8,507

    Hitchhiker
    Member

    cool. you're welcome. btw any more pictures of your frame floating around besides what's in your profile?
     
  25. scruff
    Joined: Apr 11, 2004
    Posts: 317

    scruff
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I believe Niekamp used a 27 Es*** frame;deeper channel than model a ,so more strength with a nice kickup in the back.Supposedly Niekamp liked to avoid building in stresses with welding and cutting(with a torch) so he bolted in the crossmembers.What a masterpiece.
     
  26. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,496

    The37Kid
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Just to clarify, my original reply, I wanted the original poster to know that an Es*** frame has value to vintage race car builders/restorers. Sometimes flipping something for funds is worthwhile, building something different is always a welcome sight.:)
     
  27. Floorboardinit
    Joined: Dec 2, 2004
    Posts: 771

    Floorboardinit
    Member

    Ed Iskenderian used es*** rails on his T. So I would say they would work, of course with an overhead that might be a bit much for those rails. Johnny
     
  28. RMR&C
    Joined: Dec 26, 2009
    Posts: 4,929

    RMR&C
    Member
    from NW Montana

    I say use it and don't look back...my 31 plymouth is sitting on a 33 chevy frame, it fit really well. Amazing how similar these old cars are. I have a 29 Buick frame I'm saving for a future project.......
     
  29. Hot Rod Michelle
    Joined: May 3, 2007
    Posts: 1,620

    Hot Rod Michelle
    Member

  30. draggin breath
    Joined: Feb 5, 2006
    Posts: 510

    draggin breath
    Member

    'Tis better to think outside the box than to have another belly****on car. I have a '30 Dodge frame whose rails will go under a traditional '27 roadster with a strait six someday soon.................looking for a Hudson 7x engine I can afford. 1954 style build. Don't build a belly****on car and be a sheeple.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.