Register now to get rid of these ads!

429/460 or fe

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by pie pie, Feb 25, 2011.

?

460 or fe

Poll closed Apr 26, 2011.
  1. fe

    125 vote(s)
    58.4%
  2. 429/460

    89 vote(s)
    41.6%
  1. pie pie
    Joined: Jun 29, 2008
    Posts: 673

    pie pie
    Member
    from missouri

    just wanting input on engines. ford guys, would you rather build an fe motor or 460 based motor? not talking about race engines either. how do they compare to both price, power and reliability?
     
  2. atomickustom
    Joined: Aug 30, 2005
    Posts: 3,407

    atomickustom
    Member

    I have had a few of each and they are both great motors (and I am NOT a Ford guy!). FE are smoother and seem a tad more durable, but either way they are hard to beat. I'm not voting because I would vote for both and just go with whichever one you find first.
     
  3. R Pope
    Joined: Jan 23, 2006
    Posts: 3,309

    R Pope
    Member

    Price, not much to choose from, everything is ****** expensive!
    Reliability, an FE is as reliable as a brick, properly done it will run forever. 460's will rev more if that's what you want, FE's don't like really high RPM for extended periods.
    Power, well you can't beat cubic inches. Unless you luck out and find a 427 or some such, a 460 will make better power for the bucks.
     
  4. I prefer the look fo the FE over the later motor but bang for your buck you can't beat a 460. They are a dime a dozen and cheap to overhaul compared to the FE.

    I may lean towards a 429 SCJ or CJ if I could find one but being me I would want to leave it in stock trim. But if I was to find one of those I may want to find a factory high performance 390 the price is going to be com[paribel. Either one of those in all probabbility is going to need gone through. The 429 would cost a little less than the FE but they would also be close.

    Power wise all of the above mentioned engines should be close also with the 460 producing more torque stock out of the box. the only revver in the bunch is going to be the CJ.

    None of this information is what you are looking fior correct?

    Just to middy up the waters I did manage to snag a 390 horse 390 a couple of years ago for the cost of getting it home. But I am lucky when it comes to engines so that really doesn't count. :D
     
  5. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    I run an FE because I'm stupid, and I like the '60s racing heritage, but bang for the buck, I would take a 429/460 HANDS DOWN. No contest.
     
  6. moparob
    Joined: Jan 8, 2009
    Posts: 382

    moparob
    Member

    i dig the nostalgia of the FE 390's and 428's, you got the aftermarket SCJ heads and you cant beat the look of a tri power. bang for the buck though 460!
     
  7. Iceberg460
    Joined: Jun 6, 2007
    Posts: 880

    Iceberg460
    Member

    <<<<< I'm kinda partial to the 429-460 myself:D. Bang for the buck its hard to beat (as far as Fords go).
     
  8. stevechaos13
    Joined: Sep 11, 2008
    Posts: 419

    stevechaos13
    Member

    460's are a lot of fun in every aspect except fuel economy.
    They are RELATIVELY affordable to buy and build. I've seen runners pulled from wrecked cars for anywhere from 250 to 500 bucks.
    I've also seen certain desirable stock heads go for more than that. They heads I had on my 429 were the worst. Everyone told me ot ditch em, as they are prone to grenading...
     
  9. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,740

    bobss396
    Member

    I'd go with the 429/460 myself. I did plenty of work with a 352/390 in the past and dollar for dollar, I feel the newer motor series is wise. There are plenty of go-fast parts available and lots of cores to be had. We used to ferret out the 1968-1971 vintage 429s for stock car racing. Huge valves and huge ports in those heads.

    Bob
     
  10. pie pie
    Joined: Jun 29, 2008
    Posts: 673

    pie pie
    Member
    from missouri

    how do they compare mileage wise? also not trying to get 30mpg but trying to compare the both
     
  11. RAY With
    Joined: Mar 15, 2009
    Posts: 3,132

    RAY With
    Member

    I have driven street FE's and 429,460's and all out race engines of both. Cost wise,availibility and efficiency the 429-460 wins out over all. If you have a nostalgia car and want the period look go with the engine of that time. It's a decision only you can make. 429-460 will out perform in every way over all.
     
  12. atomickustom
    Joined: Aug 30, 2005
    Posts: 3,407

    atomickustom
    Member

    Mileage? Neither is exactly an economizer. Based on my own experience with vaguely similar full-size Fords and Mercuries and one Lincoln, a 390 gets better mileage than a 429 or 460, but it's not like one gets 10 and the other gets 20. More like one gets 11 and the other gets 13, if memory serves?? (Keep in mind, though, these were 4,000-5,000 pound luxury liners I'm talking about. Although if we're talking about the car in your avatar you probably won't be seeing anything over 15 either!)

    Mine were Galaxies, Marquis, LTDs, and one Town Car. (Anyone know the plural of "Marquis"?), ranging from 1968-1978, as well as a 1964 390 in my Dad's 1956 Ford.

    My friend is from a family of drag racers and they are Ford-only. He has a 429 SCJ in his Fairlane and his brother runs a built 460 in an F-150 drag truck, but his dad runs nothing but 427 and 428 motors in his Cyclone drag cars. It's just a matter of what's available unless you're trying to be period-correct to a time before the 429 (1968 or so??)
     
  13. 64gal
    Joined: Jan 18, 2007
    Posts: 148

    64gal
    Member

    The 429-460 is a lot wider and also weighs more, around a hundred lbs. more, I think. In a Galaxie it might not matter too much, but if your swapping into somthing smaller, it may be a problem. Anyway, I vote for the FE, because thats what I like and know. Good luck.
     
  14. pie pie
    Joined: Jun 29, 2008
    Posts: 673

    pie pie
    Member
    from missouri

    yea for the galaxie. this is is first thing other than a small block i have messed with for awhile. i dont think a 351w would make enough tq.
     
  15. 57 300
    Joined: Jan 1, 2010
    Posts: 299

    57 300
    Member
    from 211 Maple

    FE = ****'n expensive.And a host of others,:DBut.........If I had it to do over,I would have stuck with the FE and had a bigger wallet.Sold my stuff and went 385 series and now regreting it.
     
  16. pie pie
    Joined: Jun 29, 2008
    Posts: 673

    pie pie
    Member
    from missouri

    why do you regret it?
     
  17. MeanGene427
    Joined: Dec 15, 2010
    Posts: 2,307

    MeanGene427
    Member
    from Napa

    Too bad you're not a little closer, I have 3 '63-'64 390-4V's out in the shop, and two still have all the drives, manifolds & such on them. For your Galaxie, no question, go with the old rumbler- 390's are actually fairly cheap to rebuild and can run real well, and if you really wanna boogey you can go with a 445 stroker kit that's pretty reasonable. Everything bolts in, headers, both cast iron and tube, are available, and a 3-deuce or 2x4 can't be beat for appearance with the "Thunderbird" valve covers, crossmember is available for a C6, and it all looks "right". Nothing sounds like a good FE with some squeeze and stick, if you could hear the 427 in my 406 car, you probably wouldn't ask the question- Milodon gear drive, solids, and 3" exhaust, and those big tailights go up and down about an inch at idle
    The 385 is cheap and reliable power, even with a stock 2-bolt block which is plenty strong, and get real big real easy, but for just plain fun, the old ****nasty FE has it all over the 385- just loud, obnoxious, in your face fun. My little Falcon has a 514 SVO in it, but I'm going to swap in my 505 FE, just more fun- and did I mention LOUD??

    [​IMG]
     
  18. trailer-Ed
    Joined: May 15, 2002
    Posts: 1,980

    trailer-Ed
    Member
    from JC, MO

    Since your car is equipped with a 390 I would just work with what I have. But if you were to start all over from scratch I'd go 429/460, less cost, better power and comparible gas mileage, in stock forms of course. Another thing to keep in mind, if you switch from FE to 429/460 you will have to change transmissions as well due to bell housing changes, and possibly shorten/ lenghthen a d-shaft. Why change whats not broke???
     
  19. Deuces
    Joined: Nov 3, 2009
    Posts: 26,693

    Deuces

    Old school FE's rule!! :D
     

    Attached Files:

  20. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    The difference is weight between an FE and a 460 is about 50-70 lbs., not enough to matter. I'm a big fan of the Lima motor, but for that Galaxie, if the money were available I'd go FE all the way.
     
  21. weathrmn
    Joined: Apr 15, 2008
    Posts: 322

    weathrmn
    Member

    My selfish opinion is fe. Only because I was raised on them, and love them.
     
  22. mrpowderkeg
    Joined: Mar 11, 2009
    Posts: 178

    mrpowderkeg
    Member

    I respectfully disagree. It's not all that expensive to build, no more so than a BBC (Big Bacon Cheese?!). You don't need a different block to build a big inch engine, the largest I've seen on a factory block is 589. A 557 Ford is a great engine, using a stock 460 block. SO build a comparable size BBC and you're already buying an aftermarket block. A 385 series ford is gonna out cube and have more power potential than a FE.
     
  23. 56don
    Joined: Dec 11, 2005
    Posts: 10,329

    56don
    Member

    I vote the FE as well. Like meangene said, it sounds so good. I used to have a 427 Tunnel Port in a 67 Fairlane with 13:1 compression. When I fired it up I had neighbors from a block away come down to see what that wicked noise was..:D
     
  24. Mike Miller
    Joined: Oct 13, 2008
    Posts: 4,558

    Mike Miller
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I've had both in hot rods and tend to lean toward the 460.
     
  25. falcongeorge
    Joined: Aug 26, 2010
    Posts: 18,339

    falcongeorge
    Member
    from BC

    As I have advised you before, you really need to figure out what your goals are and what you are trying to do. You seem to really be directionless with this car, and it really has a very big influence on what engine I & others would suggest. You dont seem to have any goal set in terms of how much power you plan to make, how fast you expect the car to be, or anything else. It really makes it hard to give advice when we dont have any clear idea as to what you expect from the finished product.
    The car already has an FE in it, if you are just looking for a nice cruiser, and dont have any specific performance goals, why are you considering swapping out the FE? Have you followed the earlier advice you were given, and gotten the car running and driving reliably, so you can get a feel for what you have?
    Not trying to be a wise-*** here, but I watch your threads on this car, and you seem to be heading off in all directions.
     
  26. 57 300
    Joined: Jan 1, 2010
    Posts: 299

    57 300
    Member
    from 211 Maple

    For what it took to reengine the car and a suspenion change,I could have still been running high 11 second times but have had a real nice truck and inclosed trailer.FE's,at least for me,were alot easier to work with.I've had my car for many years so a change to a big cube Lima was alright.Especialy when you do a throttle hit and are on your way to mid and lower 10 second times.:)I was a greedy basterd.Didn't see a long term picture.With your ride....stick with an FE......http://www.jalopyjournal.com/forum/album.php?albumid=22346
     
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2011
  27. 68bug
    Joined: Jun 23, 2009
    Posts: 1

    68bug
    Member

    390 all the way if it is for a older car and your not going racing.
    reliable CHEAP to build if your not racing it. Very Nostalgic and stock mounts to fit your car...Looks Great VEry old school
    For racing 429/460...IF you can afford the Aftermarket heads
     
  28. slickhale
    Joined: Dec 19, 2010
    Posts: 772

    slickhale
    Member
    from Phoenix

    fe seems like the no brainer here, its takes nothing to make great power and your car is set up for one and you have a motor to build. even if actual engine build costs are the same with the 385 series you still need a trans/driveshaft/trans crossmember/motor mounts/exhaust etc...... plus the fe is cooler.
     
  29. flatjack
    Joined: Feb 13, 2007
    Posts: 981

    flatjack
    Member

    Don't know how prices are today as I have lost touch with this market as my name may imply. My first new car was a 66 Cylcone GT with the 390. In 71, I put a 429 CJ in it. There was no comparison, that CJ was one bad motor. Used to shift it at 7 grand. In fact I still have it laying around.
     
  30. F8TL
    Joined: Feb 19, 2011
    Posts: 50

    F8TL
    Member

    wanted a 390, found a 352, 352 sold out from under me then POW

    460 with trans and ford 9...
    $500 for the package...

    looking at putting some fomoco 429 cobra jet heads and WAY ahead of where i would have been
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.