Register now to get rid of these ads!

Best Motor for a big truck?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Cutlassboy68, Jan 13, 2012.

  1. Cutlassboy68
    Joined: Dec 3, 2011
    Posts: 593

    Cutlassboy68
    BANNED
    from Boone, Nc

    Hey there, Im building a 1948 Chevy ton and a half and im making it a period correct car hauler, but trying to keep it usable...
    Any one know what the best period correct motor would be? it has a 1956 235 and a 4 speed, but im thinking that the top speed of that would be around 65...
    Was thinking about a Dodge diesel, but after more thinking its not that good, its way to new... And i dont know jack squat about diesels (or want to)...

    Im planning on going to SEMA this year and want to drive this truck...
    Ideas?
     
  2. Kerrynzl
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 3,598

    Kerrynzl
    Member

    stick with the ***mins 12V they are dead simple,plus you can get huge power from it
     
  3. Cutlassboy68
    Joined: Dec 3, 2011
    Posts: 593

    Cutlassboy68
    BANNED
    from Boone, Nc

    But than its not cool... Its just modern...
     
  4. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,934

    squirrel
    Member

    What are your plans for the rear axle?
     
  5. brad chevy
    Joined: Nov 22, 2009
    Posts: 2,627

    brad chevy
    Member

    If you want to keep it G.M. find you a bigblock G.M 366,they were mostly used in older trucks and buses. Not overpowered but good workhorse engine. Or you can hit the lottery and throw a 348 or 409 in it. Main thing on getting it to be a good cruiser will depend on what ****** and rear gear you run.
     
  6. 235 grannie four speed w/ (maybe) 2-sp rearend .... thats period correct! you cant have it both ways , if you want a powerful hauler go diesel.
     
  7. mike hohnstein
    Joined: Dec 4, 2011
    Posts: 262

    mike hohnstein
    BANNED
    from wisconsin

    Period correct? A 292 inline. Useful? A 454 out of a dually or 'burban w/T-400 and tallest rear gear you can find for the old axle. Then there is the issue of stopping it. We had a 50 ton and a half on the farm, it was howling pretty good @ 55 mph. Then there was the 46 Reo, now that would be a find. Gold Comet power on side of the hood or some such ****.
     
  8. Cutlassboy68
    Joined: Dec 3, 2011
    Posts: 593

    Cutlassboy68
    BANNED
    from Boone, Nc

    2 speed rear ends are geared to low to go much a faster than a normal rear end from the same time... Right?
    Thinkin about rearend out of a 90s 3500hd.

    It doesnt have to be all gm, just kinda thinkin periodish.
     
  9. derbydad276
    Joined: May 29, 2011
    Posts: 1,336

    derbydad276
    Member

    ask yorself do you want it cool or functional?

    12v ***mins with a overdrive trans for drivabilty

    here is a ramp truck that was at the ***** raid

    old school looks for cool
    with new school drivetrain for go

    it was on a ford motorhome ch***is
     

    Attached Files:

  10. Cutlassboy68
    Joined: Dec 3, 2011
    Posts: 593

    Cutlassboy68
    BANNED
    from Boone, Nc


    ... Both... My dilemma...:confused:
     
  11. GassersGarage
    Joined: Jul 1, 2007
    Posts: 4,726

    GassersGarage
    Member

    I'd keep it simple and go Cadillac powered, gobs of torque and plentiful.
     
  12. Cutlassboy68
    Joined: Dec 3, 2011
    Posts: 593

    Cutlassboy68
    BANNED
    from Boone, Nc

    Which caddy?
     
  13. 47Ford - 1.5Ton
    Joined: Apr 22, 2009
    Posts: 116

    47Ford - 1.5Ton
    Member

  14. 49ratfink
    Joined: Feb 8, 2004
    Posts: 24,894

    49ratfink
    Member
    from California

    period correct for a 1948 would be a 216.
     
  15. Rodder29
    Joined: Jan 26, 2009
    Posts: 184

    Rodder29
    Member

  16. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,934

    squirrel
    Member

    If you want to run a little engine like trucks had back then, you'll discover you need to keep the original rearend gearing to be able to haul any weight at all, and you'll only go 50 mph on the highway.

    I recently got my 57 chevy one ton on the road, it's a single wheel model, so I just used the rear from an 80s suburban, with 3.73 gears, and I'm running the normal 80s-90s size tires 235/85R16 which are sort of tall. Engine is a mild 70s 454, trans is the original 4 speed SM420 granny box. It goes down the road ok at 65-70, and stops well enough with rebuilt stock drum brakes up front, and the larger drums that came on the rearend. I haven't really towed with it yet, so I can't say how well it does with that, but I did have the same engine/gearing in another truck years ago, and it did all right.

    If mileage is important, then the diesel thing might be the way to go, but the sound/smell won't be period correct for a small truck like that.

    Engine size, load, and gearing are all related. What it boils down to is that if you want to haul a load with a small engine, you're not gonna be going very fast.
     
  17. tommy
    Joined: Mar 3, 2001
    Posts: 14,756

    tommy
    Member Emeritus

    I'd put a 348 W motor in it. Back in the day we called them dump truck motors. I know that will irritate all the W motor lovers but those are the facts. That's what we thought about them then. Lots of stump pulling torque. BBs came along in the mid 60s and quickly surp***ed the W motors for haulers but they are just too new for my antique mind. Pontiac's and Oldsmobile's were pretty good torque monsters too.
     
  18. Ole don
    Joined: Dec 16, 2005
    Posts: 2,915

    Ole don
    Member

    If you want a gas engine, a 500 Caddy would haul you well. That said, I see you live east, and speak of travel west. Those rocky mountains are big, nothing goes up those hills better than the ***mins turbo with a five speed.
     
  19. Dale Fairfax
    Joined: Jan 10, 2006
    Posts: 2,585

    Dale Fairfax
    Member Emeritus

    In the early '50s my oldest brother drove over the road tractor-trailer rigs. One of his gigs was with Dixie Auto transit where the majority of the tractors were 2 ton (6/60/6000 series) Dodges, Chevies, Studebakers, and the like. One studebaker had an inline six out of a big International transplanted into it. One of the AD Chevies had an Olds v-8. Somebody else else installed a 4-71 Detroit into (I don't remember now) some similar .
     
  20. sunbeam
    Joined: Oct 22, 2010
    Posts: 6,393

    sunbeam
    Member

    The engine bay not very wide go with an inline or a 383 sbc.
     
  21. Hackman
    Joined: Feb 4, 2009
    Posts: 646

    Hackman
    Member
    from Butte, MT

    GM built big trucks equipped with Pontiac V8's in the 60's I believe. How about a bigger cube Poncho? Retro style with all the power you would ever need.
     
  22. SKULL ORCHARD
    Joined: Jul 22, 2009
    Posts: 431

    SKULL ORCHARD
    Member
    from KS

    You are already an OLDS guy 455 /400 combo plenty of torque@ hp for cheap run for ever.
     
  23. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 59,934

    squirrel
    Member

    GMC used Pontaic V8s in the mid-late 50s. Chevy used the Buick 322 in school buses around that time. There may have been others used in trucks, too.

    These engines were all relatively small....not really suited to modern driving conditions.
     
  24. Ned Ludd
    Joined: May 15, 2009
    Posts: 5,507

    Ned Ludd
    Member

    The easy 90% way: take a ***mins, paint everything an old tractor engine colour, paint the valve covers and various ancillaries black, polish the fuel lines, and pay attention to the look of various bits and bobs.

    There are aftermarket valve covers for them but the look is all wrong:
    [​IMG][​IMG]
    One could strip the paint/coating off them and polish them, however, but I'm not sure if there is enough metal there to give the fins a trad-esque curve from front to rear.
     
  25. falconsprint63
    Joined: May 17, 2007
    Posts: 2,358

    falconsprint63
    Member
    from Mayberry

    not to stir the pot here, but I'd argue that just putting a rat fink on the truck doesn't make it "old school." nice truck, but not the least bit traditional IMHO.

     
  26. falconsprint63
    Joined: May 17, 2007
    Posts: 2,358

    falconsprint63
    Member
    from Mayberry

    if you're looking for traditional I say 390. the 331 and 365 are good motors as well, but the 390 is just a better choice if you can lay your hands on it.

    if you're willing to go newer on the engine I'd say go for the 472 not the 500.

     
  27. Barsteel
    Joined: Oct 15, 2008
    Posts: 733

    Barsteel
    Member
    from Monroe, CT

    Ok, for Old School AND fucntional, you could go with a 50s era GMC straight 6. They made a 302, and several larger sizes all the way up to I think a 506. They made some hotrod parts for a 302, so you'd be able to get some more juice out of it.

    We've already heard comments about the rear end gears...those will have to go if you want something that's highway-worthy.

    I don't know the dimensions of your rear, but I have a '59 Apache 3/4 ton...replaced the original Eaton 052 4:56 rear with a Dana 60 from an 87 Dodge 2500. Got 3:54 gears along with limited slip. I had to widen spring perches, but other that that, it was a bolt in. Truck now does 70 with ease.

    Chris
     
  28. The 500 c.i. Cadillac is a torque monster that will move it along and still get fair fuel mileage as a stock rebuild. Get the matching Turbo 400 and you're there.
     
  29. IronFord
    Joined: Jul 13, 2007
    Posts: 494

    IronFord
    Member
    from NoDak

    X2 I vote for the ***MINS
     
  30. Cutlassboy68
    Joined: Dec 3, 2011
    Posts: 593

    Cutlassboy68
    BANNED
    from Boone, Nc

    Thanks guys, Giving me alot to think about that i havent thought about till now...
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.