Register now to get rid of these ads!

Chrysler 354 Build Thread!!! It's Alive!!!

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by D-Russ, Feb 20, 2012.

  1. There are several issues with stock pushrods but the main one is that replacement cams may not have the same base circle and there is no adjustment on the pushrods or rockers to adjust the lash. The solid pushrods aren't very strong either.

    All that said I have a set of stock pushrods I'd give you if you need them. I also have some stock used 354 pistons if you need them. What is the block bored to? Can't let you give up on hemi's that easlily. :)
     
  2. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    87 octane will be fine with stock replacement pistons, but as George noted, there are many examples of new replacement pistons missing the advertised compression. You might want to ask about returning the slugs if they don't measure up.
    Also, until you have assembled the rotating assembly and know what the actual compression is I'd suggest waiting on the cam profile.

    .
     
  3. flattrack19
    Joined: Oct 13, 2011
    Posts: 4

    flattrack19
    Member

    a wise old man once told me don't try too re-invent the wheel save your money and buy the right parts.
     
  4. flattrack19
    Joined: Oct 13, 2011
    Posts: 4

    flattrack19
    Member

    i;m just saying buy the right pistons for the job.
     
  5. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    ...maybe he's a politician? :eek:

    On a similar note...DO NOT fall for the line about installing std bore 392 pistons in a 060 over 354. You won't like the results...

    .
     
  6. Yeah, a lot less swept volume creates a much lower compression.
     
  7. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,905

    George
    Member

    Yup! less stroke, less swept volume & C/R. Typically 1 point less than advertised. 10:1 392 would probably be 9:1 in a 354.
     
  8. mart3406
    Joined: May 31, 2009
    Posts: 3,055

    mart3406
    Member
    from Canada

    -------------------------
    Actually....both....simultaneously!:D

    Mart3406
    ===================
     
  9. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    Tom makes a good point. You need to make the call as to what you can live with. Rely on your machinist to help you decide what is important.

    .
     
  10. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,439

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    It should get pretty darn good mileage with a stock rebuild in a 2500 pound car. My stock 354 still lives in it's original engine compartment, which is that of a 1956 New Yorker. I don't know it's exact weight, but it's probably near a ton more than what you're talking, and has the PowerFlite trans (no overdrive). On the highway cruising between 55 and 60 it will get a solid 20-21 MPG. Radial tires, synthetic lubes in engine, trans and rear end.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2012
  11. Sounds like you can help me fill my gas tank then, Dave!
    That's great new though.
     
  12. scootermcrad
    Joined: Sep 20, 2005
    Posts: 12,383

    scootermcrad
    Member

    Looking forward to seeing what you do, Dave! Keep us posted! I have to say it's actually kind of refreshing to see someone doing just a nice little "driver" motor.

    Looking forward to see what you decide on an intake manifold for this combination as well. Once you get going with this build, maybe do a build thread on the engine like you did with your Victoria threads. Would be a great parallel thread to the Vic build!
     
  13. Rob3865
    Joined: May 23, 2011
    Posts: 106

    Rob3865
    Member

    The 283 pistons will actually work in a 331. I did some quick math over on the united engine web site and the wrist pin location will put the piston .0004" out of the block, which would work. Of course, you'd have to adapt the wristpin size which could be bushed for the difference, plus the bore is just a touch bigger. Maybe that's what someone figured out and wanted to do? Sure wouldn't have a lot of compression though. Also, you'd have to notch the pistons in the right place I am sure.....but physically it would work. Sure would be a lotta trouble though.
     
  14. I thought I'd make this my engine build thread so I changed the thread title. I'll post all the steps as I go. Here's where I'm at right now – just a pile of parts.

    331, 354. :)

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2012
  15. Nice Dave!
    Keep us updated. And good luck finding your dream intake for it!
     
  16. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,627

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    A rare and expensive 3x2? Don't you really want a 6x2???? :D:D:D:D Waiting to hear back on a possible trade on my 6x2 but if that falls through you can expect it up in the classifieds. I'm giving up on the idea of running a HEMI.....going flathead instead.

    One of those engines is going to look incredible in that hot rod of yours. Best of luck.
     
  17. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,905

    George
    Member

    97s or modern 2 bls?:confused: 3 97s are only 450 CFM. You'd need to run the 2 end ones as primaries & the center as the progressive or all 3 nonprogressive, just something to think about....
     
  18. Dave, your vicky should easily exceed 20 mpg, once the induction is dialed-in.

    On the other hand, a whale weighs ~150 lb more than the SBC its replacing, so expect it to understeer a little more in the corners.

    Life's full of compromises... ;)
     
    Last edited: Mar 6, 2012

  19. That should work out great and get you fantasic mileage. My pontiac with tri-power 4 speed and a 3.08 rear gear got 17-20 mpg. It would also boil the hide clean off those tires right thru all 4 gears and not stop until you lifted. 20 mpg not applicable to burnouts. Lol
     
  20. Now you're talking Olds J-2.
    I love it!
     
  21. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,905

    George
    Member

    There is a guy I've seen a few times on the Power Tour with a 57-8(?) Olds with a 392 in it!:)
     
  22. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,905

    George
    Member

    Yeah, I'd say so!:) There's a guy who hasn't finished his engine yet, but is planning on running 2 2GCs on a 2X1 truck intake with adaptors!
     
  23. Dave figure
    ( Cubic inches x ( rpm/2) ) / 1728 = cfm required to feed engine at 100% volumetric efficacy. Reality would be less.

    A 354 needs 102 cfm for every 1000 rpm you want to run at.
    Your 280 cfm center carb would be good for 2700 - 2800 rpm.
     
  24. The go for big money on ebay!

    Just noticed Dave, once you drop the Hemi in there, you'll have to change your HAMB name to "another 31Vicky with a hemi"!
     
  25. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,905

    George
    Member

    yup!
     
  26. A little update: I'm taking the block, heads and crank to the machine shop at lunch today to get cleaned and magnafluxed. Hopefully they'll get a clean bill of health. I'll also know what machine work the engine will require.

    Oh, and these showed up today. I happened to find them on eBay with a buy it now of $99. So I jumped on them. The chrome is a little thin around the bolt holes, but for the price, I'm happy. I also picked up a pair of rechromed original wire covers from hotrodA.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  27. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,627

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    Damn those look great Dave!!! There has never been a better looking valve cover for a hemi then the original Firepower ones installed from the factory bar none.

    Good luck at the machine shop, I hope it all checks out and by some mistake in numbers you end up with a 392 that needs little to no machine work! :D
     
  28. Larry Fulton
    Joined: Jul 3, 2011
    Posts: 31

    Larry Fulton
    Member

    If they are in fact J2 Carbs - All 3 carbs will have / should have the 1 1/4" Diameter Venturi bowl sections.

    The smaller / more common 1 3/32" Diameter Venturi bowl sections (factory adv. 278 cfm) will work just fine with these 331-392 Chrysler HEMI motors... as they don't need as much carburetor / cfm as one might think.

    I'm working on holley / wieand to re-introduce the WC3D...
    I'll let everyone know here when this happens.

    Nice looking project... Keep up the good work!!
     

  29. Mr. Fulton, I was just looking around on your site for a Chrysler hemi 3x2 intake. It would be AWESOME if you reproduced the WC3D! Sign me up.

    Eelco and Vintage Speed both say they're in the process of repoping it, but they don't have the corporate backing of Weiand and Holley.

    What is your development timeline? When will they be available?

    And how would I measure the venturi bowl section on my carbs? Where is that exactly?

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2012
  30. TR Waters
    Joined: Nov 18, 2006
    Posts: 1,439

    TR Waters
    Member
    from Vermont
    1. Early Hemi Tech

    Please let us know how those valve covers fit and seal.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.