Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 54 chrysler new yorker

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by kply39, Sep 6, 2012.

  1. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,756

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    Sometimes you have to go in on a slow day to get the parts guys attention. They will not ignore a garage order for hundreds of $$$ of parts, to look up some obscure part for a car that was old when Cher was a virgin.

    Catch them on a slow day and they may be more obliging.
     
  2. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,892

    George
    Member

    Yes
     
  3. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,892

    George
    Member

    Turns out you are right about the PF on the 54 long tails. Allways heard of only the FD being used on long tails, never thought to look @ the tranny section of the '54 shop manual. The only A/T tranny offered in '54 was the PF!:eek: Listed for both long & short tail.
     
  4. 50dodge4x4
    Joined: Aug 7, 2004
    Posts: 3,534

    50dodge4x4
    Member

    OK, so Kply39 listed the number off the block C251-8-xxxxx. I have a book called the Standard Book of Chrysler that has been very dependable with numbers, options and such info. According to that book, the number stamped on the block identifies it as a standard 54 New Yorker with the 195 HP 331 (which i assume means a 2bbl because the 4bbl motor makes 235 HP) The serial number on the door post agrees with the standard New Yorker, not the deluxe (which had the 4bbl carb). The book listed a 53 motor starting with a C53-8, and the big HP 54 motor starting with C542-8.

    The book also states the PowerFlite transmission was introduced in June 1953 and had over 35,000 PowerFlite transmissions were installed by the end of the 53 model year. The PowerFlite replaced the fluid drive as the automatic transmission choice in June of 1953, all 54 model year automatic transmission cars came with a PowerFlite trans.

    The book lists a production of 2,079 Standard New Yorker 2 door 6 passenger Club Coupes in 1954. BTY, the 2 door coupe weighed 3910 lbs shipping weight. The standard New Yorker had a 195 HP 331 with a Carter WCD 2039S, 2039SA and single exhaust.

    The book also lists a production of 1816 Deluxe New Yorker 2 door 6 passenger club coupes in 1954. The Deluxe 2 door club coupe weighed 4005 lbs. The Deluxe New Yorker had the 235 HP 331 ci with a WCFB Carter with dual exhaust.

    By this info, I think we have a standard length block with a 2bbl carb and a PowerFlite trans, which is what I see when I look at the car.

    As far as the auto parts stores, the one with the paper books is always slow, and the guys move slow, and really don't want to put forth the effort to search for anything that is not standard fair. If the store belonged to me, the whole bunch would be gone, but I think the old guys are the owners. I get a discount from NAPA and the master cylinder kit was less expensive then the price listed at Andy's.

    On a high note, I filled the master and drove the car down the street late this afternoon. MAJOR milestone. We have a lot of stuff to do before we want to drive it too far from home. Gene
     
  5. 50dodge4x4
    Joined: Aug 7, 2004
    Posts: 3,534

    50dodge4x4
    Member

    OK I just read George's post.

    Someone tell me how to identify the extended block by site. The transmission mounting surface is only about 1" behind the distributor and it looks like a normal size bellhousing (from a 70s perspective) to me. There is an additional plate about 3/4" -1" thick between the transmission and the motor.

    How much longer is the block on the extended block then the standard block? I'm beginning to wish i had a factory service manual here for this car. Gene
     
  6. Big_John
    Joined: Mar 28, 2006
    Posts: 334

    Big_John
    Member
    from Upstate NY

  7. gsp392
    Joined: Nov 8, 2010
    Posts: 253

    gsp392
    Member

    Beautiful car. Good luck with the build.
     
  8. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,892

    George
    Member

    From the rise/back end of the valley(in front of the dizzy hole) to the end of the extension is 7". The '54 long tail block is supposed to be the same casting & casting number that was used on the 51-3s, 1323329 Should be on the top of the extension. The short tail # is 1330129 but is between the head & valley cover pass side rear & is difficult to impossible to read with the intake on.
     
  9. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,892

    George
    Member

    If you have a short tail 2 bl with a different casting #, post it!
     
  10. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member


    The top of the extended block looks like this:
    [​IMG]

    You can also look at the under side; does the assembly have a removeable section (bottom half of the bell) that the starter is mounted to? ...cast iron and about 4" wide...2 bolts each side at the split...

    If yours is 'normal' looking then it is a 54 block. Like George says, pretty damned hard to see the casting number...:(

    .
     
  11. mattlowe
    Joined: May 7, 2008
    Posts: 145

    mattlowe
    Member

    ive had good luck with color safe bleach mixed up with water in a spray bottle and rub it in a bit and blot with a towel, should work with out messin up headliner
     
  12. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL


    Your '54 New Yorker is NOT a Club Coupe, but rather a Newport. The Club Coupe is a 2 dr post model, whereas yours is obviously a "hardtop" style with no upper door pillar.

    Ray
     
  13. mr crocket
    Joined: Feb 9, 2009
    Posts: 70

    mr crocket
    Member

    Star bright mold and mildew remover for marine interior use.spray it on and walk away I was suprised how well it did.They also make blockers to keep it from coming back.3M also makes mildew and mold products for marine use that works very good.Also use dessicant containers to control moisture and odors
     
  14. kply39
    Joined: Mar 22, 2007
    Posts: 117

    kply39
    Member
    from N.W. IL

    I really appreciate all the comments and compliments! I have learned alot about this old chrysler this past week. As my dad stated earlier, yesterday we drove it around the block for the first time. We have a few more things to work on but with any luck realisticly we could be on the road with it by end of next week! Thanks Eric
     
  15. Rusty O'Toole
    Joined: Sep 17, 2006
    Posts: 9,756

    Rusty O'Toole
    Member

    C54 = 1952 Imperial motor

    C56-1 = 1953 New Yorker motor

    C56-2 = 1953 New Yorker special motor
     
  16. Piecrust
    Joined: Oct 7, 2011
    Posts: 23

    Piecrust
    Member

    Good lookin car, Here's my Uncle for inspiration.
     

    Attached Files:

  17. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,892

    George
    Member

    What you've posted is CAR model codes C52 51-2 NYer Deluxe, C53 51-2 Imp, C56-1 is 53 NYer & C56-2 NY Deluxe,


    Engine use codes match the year C52 is '52, C53 is '53, & '54 is C541 for 2 bl & C542 for 4 bl
     
  18. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    ...hate to be the bearer of bad news, but...
     

    Attached Files:

  19. 50dodge4x4
    Joined: Aug 7, 2004
    Posts: 3,534

    50dodge4x4
    Member

    Is this picture orientated with the intake towards the top of the picture and the transmission towards the bottom of the picture?

    If the hole in the top left side is the distributor hole, and The trans is below the picture, we do not have a long block. The distance between the ledge the dist sits on and where the bell bolts on is only about an inch, or about the same distance as a LA 318/360.
    There is no way we are going to be able to see any numbers at the back of this motor while its still in the car, we can't even get a camera in there to take a picture. Maybe if I pull the distributor out, I might be able to get a tape measure in there. I'm going to be under the car next week to replace pull the master cylinder, maybe i can get some pictures from the bottom then.

    Big John, does your car have a V8 or is it a six? None of the pictures show a "Y" pipe with the single exhaust, and the only dual exhaust shown is for a 55-56. Those cars are a different body then the 54 is, 55 was a redesign year. It the exhaust for the 55/56 would work on the 54 we would be happy campers.

    Also, thanks to the guys that posted possible solutions to the mold in the headliner question, we will look into those suggestions.

    Hynstay, Thanks, I missed the 2 door Newport 6 passenger, that one had a shipping weight of 4005 lbs and had a production of 1312 cars! This thing is getting more rare by the minute. :)

    If that 2nd picture 73RR posted in the last entry is what an extended block looks like, we definitely do NOT have an extended bell! I may pull the dist tomorrow and get some pictures! Gene
     
    Last edited: Sep 8, 2012
  20. d2_willys
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,323

    d2_willys
    Member
    from Kansas

  21. d2_willys
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,323

    d2_willys
    Member
    from Kansas

    Here is a picture of the long tail engine with Powerflite. Notice the very narrow adapter plate. (From Powerflite video)

    53 powerflite.jpg
     
  22. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,355

    Hnstray
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Quincy, IL

    This thread, with the info about the 'long tail' Powerflite trans, has been a revelation of sorts. I have been fooling around with Chrysler products since about 1960 or so, including owning a '51 NY, a '53 NY, a few Plymouths and a Dodge in that era, and more Mopars in later years. I have two now..........and in all that time I have never come across or heard of the Powerflite pictured above. Amazing!

    This has certainly been an educational experience. Love the HAMB and the depth of knowledge that resides here.

    Ray
     
  23. d2_willys
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,323

    d2_willys
    Member
    from Kansas

    Here's the link:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qf-eX_trcHQ&feature=gv
     
  24. d2_willys
    Joined: Sep 8, 2007
    Posts: 4,323

    d2_willys
    Member
    from Kansas

    Now you got me curious about my 54 NYD. All stock, so I am curious if it has a short tail engine. If the threader has a short tail, I would believe mine is a short tail considering it is the 235hp 4bbl engine.

    I do know something, I believe my car is an early 54 model, as it has GEMMER HYDROGUIDE power steering, while the latter models had CHRYSLER COAXIAL power steering. So who knows what I will find tomorrow. I still believe it is a short tail, so your pictures of the engine number are curious.
     
  25. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,892

    George
    Member

    Could it just be a misstamp? Monday morning screw up?:confused:
     
  26. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,892

    George
    Member

    My '54 4 bl out of my Imp is C542.
     
  27. George
    Joined: Jan 1, 2005
    Posts: 7,892

    George
    Member

    As I mentioned earlier, I had never looked @ the tranny section of my '54 shop manual before. Both the normal & the pancaked bell PFs are shown in it!
     
  28. 73RR
    Joined: Jan 29, 2007
    Posts: 7,342

    73RR
    Member

    First, back to Gene... by your description, you have a 'normal' block.

    As to the 'how-what-why' of the apparent madness that ran rampant in Chrysler in the old days, folks can only shake their collective heads and push on. There are so many examples of odd pairings, year-make-model application mis-match and what can only be attributed to "use up the existing inventory as best you can" packages that we really must consider it entertainment of sorts.
    Like many others, I have been messing with these things a long time and I am never really surprised when someone finds something new... or old.

    .
     

  29. Years ago I used to buy lots of stuff from Andy for my '53. He was always good to deal with back then, hope he still is.
     
  30. Man, you have a rare car...the tudor hardtops were and are hard to find. They are the ones fetching a good price from restorers, the rest of the cars, mostly fordors go under 5K despite condtion. You have a great car. I had a '54 NYer from '64-'67 and used to bait Chevys with it as long as they were Impalas with powerglides and 327 or smaller. They's usually got the NYer off the line but once the secondarys kicked open, it was Bye-bye. I've got a '53 now with the six which I need to do something with....2nd owner and only an actual 83K on it. Hang on to that '54, it is unique at shows like GoodGuys!:D
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.