Register now to get rid of these ads!

Which engine would you run?

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by devotion, Nov 26, 2012.

  1. devotion
    Joined: Apr 15, 2009
    Posts: 193

    devotion
    Member
    from idaho

    The car is a model a sport coupe. 4 inch dropped front, back lowered a few inches, chopped 3 inches, full hood, 40 ford brakes and shells, black wall tires... You get the picture. I have two motor choices available for the car. One is a sbc 305,the other is a ford 2.3 both are solid motors. The 2.3 has been completely rebuilt from the bottom up. It would be a lot lighter, great gas mileage, reliable, and an easy fit. I could retain more leg room. Sbc is going to sound better, have more low end. Need some opinions and I know some of you have those.
     
  2. Dakota
    Joined: Jan 21, 2004
    Posts: 1,535

    Dakota
    Member
    from Beulah, ND

    305 dressed up right.... my opinion. but the 2.3 is a decent motor, if you run a full hood it wouldent matter much.
     
  3. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    I'm doing a 29 RPU on 32 rails high boy style right now with a 2.3 Ford - Esslinger Head, dual side drafts Webers - much more fun than another same old SBC.
     
  4. You know what they say.....could have had a V8!!
     
  5. PackardV8
    Joined: Jun 7, 2007
    Posts: 1,323

    PackardV8
    Member

    With the full hood, the engine isn't a dominant visual element, so it doesn't matter as much. Either would work, but the 305" is the obvious choice.

    jack vines
     
  6. MATACONCEPTS
    Joined: Aug 7, 2009
    Posts: 2,069

    MATACONCEPTS
    BANNED

    Its cooler to run a V8 than a Pinto. The original 4 banger is cooler than a Pinto. No one thinks a Pinto is cool, hence the full hood.
     
  7. Rich Rogers
    Joined: Apr 8, 2006
    Posts: 2,018

    Rich Rogers
    Member

    The 305 setup can give you some good mpg and decent power. A buddy of mine has one with the stock HEI, Edelbrock intake and carb and T-350 trans and I think a 3:00 gear. It runs great in a light car like an A.
     
  8. JeffreyJames
    Joined: Jun 13, 2007
    Posts: 16,626

    JeffreyJames
    Member
    from SUGAR CITY

    Flathead.....wait that's not an option? Oh then V8.
     
  9. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    That just shows your ignorance about the Pinto motor. One of the largest threads on here is devoted to the Pinto Motors and there are a ton of members running them. The stroked to 2.8 version in my Ranger Race truck made right at 300HP with half the weight of a V8 motor.
    And if you don't think this motor is Bad *** looking, you need your heart rate checked, or at least your automotive soul
    [​IMG]

    And I'm not an SBC hater, got one in my 37, but they are white bread, boring same-o same-0, sometimes you need to dare to be different
     
  10. FrozenMerc
    Joined: Sep 4, 2009
    Posts: 3,412

    FrozenMerc
    Member

  11. But how many times more money? I'm guessing he is on a tight budget if he's considering as 305 smog motor instead of a 350, 327, 283, etc.
     
  12. TP
    Joined: Dec 13, 2001
    Posts: 2,023

    TP
    Member
    from conroe tx

    I had a 28 rpu a few years back. I ran a ford thunderbird super coupe intercooled motor. it was fast and economical.
     
  13. Tough choice, I flipped a coin and it was the pinto mill.
     

  14. So how much did it cost to make the same power as a V8 at half the weight?


    I'd run the V8, myself, I don't think it's going to hit you too bad in the milage department if you drive careful and gear it right. But when you need to p*** a guy there's no replacement for that torque, and if these are your only options you're not going to spend the bucks to make that 2.3 perform like a V8 either.
     
  15. 383deuce
    Joined: Jul 10, 2009
    Posts: 3,668

    383deuce
    Member

    To keep the $$$ down as I am guessing you want to. I would go with the V8
     
  16. crminal
    Joined: Jun 6, 2010
    Posts: 1,941

    crminal
    Member

    Had a Esslinger built 2.3 in my sandrail, mid-engine. It was bad*** compared to running a V-dub at the time. Got my moneys worth for sure. Spent about 5 grand all tolled. If I was doing and old school build with a banger flair, I'd use the 2.3 over a banger motor if I wanted a driver. Really think it would would hard to beat for the look.

    Now, IMO, a V8 is a V8 and if that's the later rod look you want, and if you are on a budget, what the heck. Run the 305 and have fun.
     
  17. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage

    yup the 4 bangers are cute..but..they dont sound right..
    and for a hot rod ..theres no replacement for displacement

    how much $ did it take to get 300 ponies out of the banger?
    VS how much it would take $ to get 300 out of an SBC..

    and how many miles will you get out of a mild sbc VS a pumped up steriod enhanced 4 banger?

    time to go break the piggy bank..its only money, right?
     
  18. devotion
    Joined: Apr 15, 2009
    Posts: 193

    devotion
    Member
    from idaho

    The sound! Honestly a huge factor in the decision.
     
  19. crminal
    Joined: Jun 6, 2010
    Posts: 1,941

    crminal
    Member

    Well, if you are interested in the sound as part of the cool factor, go with the 2.3

    When you pull up with a tuned 2.3 and the right pipes, I guarantee people will want to see what your running. They do sound great
     
  20. devotion
    Joined: Apr 15, 2009
    Posts: 193

    devotion
    Member
    from idaho

    Really... Interesting... What exhaust set up have you heard on those motors that sounds right? Seems like they sound good at idle, but get a real tuner sound when they get wound up.
     
  21. MATACONCEPTS
    Joined: Aug 7, 2009
    Posts: 2,069

    MATACONCEPTS
    BANNED


    My Bad Doing. One guy thinks a Pinto is cooler than a SBC.
     
  22. Zapato
    Joined: Mar 5, 2001
    Posts: 2,195

    Zapato
    Member Emeritus

    Couldn't have said it any better. Lots of stuff available to make those motors scream. Go with the 2.3 .
     
  23. travj31
    Joined: May 19, 2008
    Posts: 1,520

    travj31
    Member
    from Western PA

    one thing I didnt see mentioned by the OP was what kind of rear he is planning on using... if going with a banjo, i'd be somewhat tempted to put the 2.3 in for reliability. however, i'm kind of contradicting myself because i just sold a sport soupe that sounds alot like yours but mine had a 350 sbc... it was fenderless, but i did run a hood. i had a banjo, 39-3 speed...blah blah blah. the best part of it was the sound though. people would ***ume it was a banger because of the look of the entire car. all i know was it was a lot of fun when pulling out of the local cruise and hearin' the sound of a sbc and turnin a little tire:D

    in other words... my vote is
    V8!!!

    here is a pic of my sport coupe i just sold...
     

    Attached Files:

  24. 327Eric
    Joined: May 9, 2008
    Posts: 2,203

    327Eric
    Member

    I like both. The 2.3 is a great engine with a turbo, and 5 speed, and a roller 305 can't be beat for economy and power in a light car. I'd do the 2.3 if i could.
     
  25. Stevie Nash
    Joined: Oct 24, 2007
    Posts: 2,999

    Stevie Nash
    Member

    You can run a closed hood, but you're still going to hear the engine. V8 is the obvious choice.
     
  26. CURTL
    Joined: Nov 25, 2012
    Posts: 11

    CURTL
    Member
    from Michigan

    Ford in a ford , 2.3 turbo . But that's just my opinion .
     
  27. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    This thread, like so many on here, is pretty funny.
    All over the HAMB guys ***** about Belly ****on Chevy Small Blocks, then when some guy asks for an alternative opinion versus the weak ****, worst of the SBC's, the 305, everyone raves about how great the SBC is and gee it might cost more to do a 2.3 Ford.
    Well, if you had read his post, he has a rebuilt 2.3, so he won't have to spend a ton of money - I only mentioned my 300HP version to show the potential (as well as the picture of that one prepped for Midget racing)
    Keep being Sheeple and building your belly ****ons while *****ing - carry on.
     
  28. MATACONCEPTS
    Joined: Aug 7, 2009
    Posts: 2,069

    MATACONCEPTS
    BANNED

    eeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaa

    or

    RRRRWWWWOOAAARRR


    What sound do you want coming from your car?
     
  29. Von Rigg Fink
    Joined: Jun 11, 2007
    Posts: 13,401

    Von Rigg Fink
    Member
    from Garage


    Ahhh ok so yer the guy that got this thread off track:D

    PS it dont take a "ton" of money to get 300 ponies out of an SBC;) but I know you already know that:)
     
    Last edited: Nov 26, 2012
  30. devotion
    Joined: Apr 15, 2009
    Posts: 193

    devotion
    Member
    from idaho





    2.3 bottom end rebuilt stock, d port head, milled head, oversized valves, tube header. Nothing major.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.