Register now to get rid of these ads!

Help from anyone who has had a Chevy before

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by rp23g7, May 14, 2013.

  1. rp23g7
    Joined: May 14, 2013
    Posts: 9

    rp23g7
    Member
    from Seattle

    HI, newbie from Seattle here, with some questions.

    So, I may need some help from you that may have had or still has a Chevy before.

    We have a 41 Chrysler Street rod that needs a front end rebuild.

    I contacted the guy that built it, 30 yrs ago and he said he made it with the front suspension of a 70 Monte Carlo, I never believed that as its way too narrow.


    I called him the other day and he said it may be 69 Nova, can any of you guys help?
    I googled the part number of the Pitman arm pictured and it comes up as a 68-69 Chevelle/Firebird/Camaro, so possibly a Nova too,


    I tried the caliper pictured but it didn't come up as anything, do the pictures look familiar to anyone?

    I also tried posting on a few Nova websites, any ideas, thanks everyone
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: May 21, 2013
  2. upspirate
    Joined: Apr 15, 2012
    Posts: 2,303

    upspirate
    Member

  3. upspirate
    Joined: Apr 15, 2012
    Posts: 2,303

    upspirate
    Member

  4. Heck I'm not even convinced the car is a '41 Chrysler. The front clip sure isn't.
     
  5. MATACONCEPTS
    Joined: Aug 7, 2009
    Posts: 2,069

    MATACONCEPTS
    BANNED

    72 & down Chevy's had bolt-on steering arms on the spindles. That is not a metric caliper, so my guess, 73 - 77 GM
     
  6. rp23g7
    Joined: May 14, 2013
    Posts: 9

    rp23g7
    Member
    from Seattle

    Its a 41 Chrysler Business Coupe actually with a 37-38 Chevy nose on it. Pretty original for sure.

    The guy who built it was a body and paint guy, its got 10 coats of hand rubbed Candy Apple Red and Silver on it, he leaded the bodywork and made the front end himself.

    He built it 30 yrs ago, has diabetes, and got sick, he had it sitting in his garage for 5 yrs, I bought it 3 yrs ago, rewired it and put a new interior in it.

    I called him to ask what he used to make it, he has 20 other cars, so he wasn't really sure.
     
  7. wbrw32
    Joined: Oct 27, 2007
    Posts: 7,314

    wbrw32
    Member

    rp23g7...did you click on the link posted by Upspitate????...DO SO..
     
  8. 5window
    Joined: Jan 29, 2005
    Posts: 9,939

    5window
    Member

    Damn, Newbie! Why'd you want to go and post all of those useful pictures? Now the HAMB police won't have anything to gripe about. :) I suppose you should do an intro, but it's mere formality for people to bitch about if you don't. Nobody really reads them, fewer people actually have anything to say in them and 4000 posts later, no one cares.
     
  9. rp23g7
    Joined: May 14, 2013
    Posts: 9

    rp23g7
    Member
    from Seattle

  10. rp23g7
    Joined: May 14, 2013
    Posts: 9

    rp23g7
    Member
    from Seattle

    roger that, did so, sorry
     
  11. upspirate
    Joined: Apr 15, 2012
    Posts: 2,303

    upspirate
    Member

    Be careful when checking calipers....the first I thought I had from chevlle,lemans etc had the hose coming out at a different angle....same casting # etc,but they were different
     
  12. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,814

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I think he hit it just about on the money. As far as I know the one piece Spindle/caliper bracket on that size of car started in 73. 64/72 Chevelle size cars you could unbolt the drum brake stuff from the spindle and bolt on Disk from a 71/72 Chevelle or Monte Carlo. I think I remember the car from rod trots 20/30 years ago but never paid any real attention to it.
     
  13. rp23g7
    Joined: May 14, 2013
    Posts: 9

    rp23g7
    Member
    from Seattle

    It was owned by a man named Jim, (Indian Jim, to his friends), Grey Eagle), he lives in Everett still, would have been cruising it 20 or so yrs ago
     
  14. MATACONCEPTS
    Joined: Aug 7, 2009
    Posts: 2,069

    MATACONCEPTS
    BANNED

    Now we feel better about giving you the proper care & love.
     
  15. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,536

    alchemy
    Member

    I don't have a lot of experience with Chivvies, but the frontend in the '67 Chevelle I had when I was a kid looked a lot like that. Other than the disk brakes.

    As said before, the whole spindle/brake assembly may be from a different car.

    I suggest popping out the bushings and ball joints and taking them with you to the parts store to match up to the new pieces. Take a caliper (the measuring instrument) and compare old to new. Even if the exact year is off a bit, the part may still fit.

    You may get lucky and find a common car the parts all match to, and be able to work backwards to find the clip's identity.
     
  16. mixedupamx
    Joined: Dec 2, 2006
    Posts: 513

    mixedupamx
    Member

    that crossmember is fairly unique with the center bumpout try googleing different cars front suspension and look for the x member bump.
     
  17. MATACONCEPTS
    Joined: Aug 7, 2009
    Posts: 2,069

    MATACONCEPTS
    BANNED

    The frame does kind of look like a NOVA. It could be a pre-72 drum brake chassis with later 73 spindles, disk, & upper a-arms.

    Check the lower a-arm bushing in the frame & see if they are round or oval
     
  18. upspirate
    Joined: Apr 15, 2012
    Posts: 2,303

    upspirate
    Member

    Didn't some GM's have front steer and some rear?

    Nova and Camaro were different if I recall,but don't remember which was which
     
  19. Larry T
    Joined: Nov 24, 2004
    Posts: 7,921

    Larry T
    Member

    Weren't Camaros thru 69 and Novas thru 72 (I think) rear steer. That looks like a front steer setup.

    And you might be suprised how many suspension parts the Camaros and Chevelles/Monte Carlos share if you look in the book.
     
  20. fatkoop
    Joined: Nov 17, 2009
    Posts: 713

    fatkoop
    Member

    Is that a crack I see in the steering box?
     
  21. Russco
    Joined: Nov 27, 2005
    Posts: 4,397

    Russco
    Member
    from Central IL

    Yes, the first gen Camaros and the Novas thru maybe 74 even were rear steer.
     
  22. rusty1
    Joined: Nov 25, 2004
    Posts: 13,011

    rusty1
    Member

    ...I noticed that too.!? ...67-9 Camaro/F-bird and 68-74 Nova /clones were rear-steer so it's not one of those.
     
  23. 34toddster
    Joined: Mar 28, 2006
    Posts: 1,482

    34toddster
    Member
    from Missouri

    My vote is a 73-7? Camaro The rear steer stopped in 72 Nova's. 70 1/2 was the first Camaro for front steer.
    I thought that was a crack in the box too, but I think it's just a stain or something!
     
  24. Thumper
    Joined: Mar 7, 2005
    Posts: 1,610

    Thumper
    Member

    While your in there...you need to take the rubber brake hoses loose and unwind them. It ain't good to run them all twisted like that.:)
     
  25. hotroddon
    Joined: Sep 22, 2007
    Posts: 28,240

    hotroddon
    Member

    The Pitman arm part number is for 67-72 Lemans, GTO, Tempest, Chevelle, Cutlass, Buick Special etc. The date code is from July of 67, so I'd say the steering box and Pitman are 68-72 GM A body as they had probably already shifted to 68 production by July
     
    Last edited: May 15, 2013
  26. rp23g7
    Joined: May 14, 2013
    Posts: 9

    rp23g7
    Member
    from Seattle

    Thanks for everyones help.

    I got under and took some measurments and part numbers if that could help.

    so here are some measurments and numbers.
    Calipers have two hex hold downs, 3/8 hex, the
    left caliper has P/N 18002328 with a 28 8L on it and a G286 on it
    right has the same number
    the rotor has
    337226 with a 866 and a GM 68 on it
    Lower Control Arm measurments
    from center ball joint to the rear attach mount is 16 inches, the front mount to the ball joint is 18 inches
    Upper Control arm rear bolt to upper ball joint is 12 inches
    the center link is 17,5 from center of Pitman Arm to inner tie rod and 23 inches to the idler arm.
    Frame is 26 inches wide at the front, its been cut so don't know if it gets wider in a area that's further forward
    the Cross member has the lower control arm mounts 15 inches apart.
    the spindles have 371676 13 and a 211 on them
    the bleeder on the caliper is 3/8, the castle nuts on the ball joints are 3/4 and 7/8th and the upper CA bushing has 9/16ths





     
  27. rp23g7
    Joined: May 14, 2013
    Posts: 9

    rp23g7
    Member
    from Seattle

    We went to a show today, some late 60s Novas and Chevelles there, looked at a 68 Nova, it looked nothing like the street rods steering, neither did a 69 Chevelle. There was not a 2nd gen Camaro there, but there was a 75 Nova across the street, went to look at it, Perfect Match, WOO HOO
     
  28. mustang6147
    Joined: Feb 26, 2010
    Posts: 1,847

    mustang6147
    Member
    from Kent, Ohio

    I vote 70 ish monte carlo
     
  29. propwash
    Joined: Jul 25, 2005
    Posts: 3,857

    propwash
    Member
    from Las Vegas

    I would suggest that you see if you can figure out why there are so many spring shims sitting in there. That's not good for front end geometry. If the steering box is cracked and there's a need for those spring spacers, you might consider an MII kit or something.
     
  30. raidmagic
    Joined: Dec 10, 2007
    Posts: 1,440

    raidmagic
    Member

    So you didn't read the post directly above yours?
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.