Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical What the hell is going on here?

Discussion in 'Traditional Hot Rods' started by Mr T body, Jan 7, 2014.

  1. Mr T body
    Joined: Nov 2, 2005
    Posts: 2,227

    Mr T body
    Alliance Vendor
    from BHC AZ

    I'm finishing up tacking the nuts inside the frame rails for my '31 coupe and noticed something odd. In everything I've seen, the 2 carriage bolts thru the floor go into the 2 holes on the bracket riveted to the rail. On mine, the FRONT bolt on the body goes thru the BACK hole on the bracket. This means there's only one bolt holding it on to each bracket. I've measured this thing 5 ways from Sunday and all the other mounts line up, and I really don't see a problem with only 1 bolt thru each bracket, but it got me wondering if this frame is for a different model/year/? I even have the original blocks and pads and the imprints show it's been this way for a LONG time.
    [​IMG]
     
  2. aonemarine
    Joined: Nov 2, 2013
    Posts: 500

    aonemarine
    Member
    from Delaware

    I remember something about this....maybe roadster vs sedan?? Someone will chime in..

    Nice cracker box
     
  3. Mr T body
    Joined: Nov 2, 2005
    Posts: 2,227

    Mr T body
    Alliance Vendor
    from BHC AZ

    You gave me enough to find the answer on an old thread.
    From bjinx in a thread about cowl mounting...
    "I had this same issue with my '31 tudor sedan, the rear hole in the subrail would line up with the front hole on the frame bracket and the front hole on the subrail would only line up with the hole in the frame apron. I posted this question on the fordbarn and the answer I got was that Ford changed the location of the frame bracket in early '31 to accomadate the heavier 4 dr bodys and did not feel it would be a problem with the lighter bodies. I have a TCI frame and had to install the frame brackets to my frame, so I located the body so the cross subrail holes lined up with mounting holes in the frame and located the frame bracket so both of the subrail holes lined up with both holes in the bracket. Hope this makes sense and helps"

    Looks like one hole per bracket it is!
     
  4. Mr T body
    Joined: Nov 2, 2005
    Posts: 2,227

    Mr T body
    Alliance Vendor
    from BHC AZ

    Oh, and the pic I modified was backwards. The body pad sits forward of the frame bracket.
     
  5. Cowtown Speed Shop
    Joined: Sep 26, 2010
    Posts: 1,196

    Cowtown Speed Shop
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from KC

    That frame was probably originally for a briggs body (4Dr and Vicky, cabriolet and a few others) Briggs bodys are completely diffren't from standard ford bodys. They are based on wood subrails. Also I think the answer you got from fordbarn is incorrect....As I have seen this same diffrence on a 29 briggs body. So if they changed it in 31 that would not make any sense.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2014
  6. aonemarine
    Joined: Nov 2, 2013
    Posts: 500

    aonemarine
    Member
    from Delaware

    knew it was something like that, surprised no one chimed in... I bet I forget about it by the next time i see it LOL
     
  7. Carter
    Joined: Mar 18, 2006
    Posts: 1,533

    Carter
    Member

    It was indeed a 1931 change to the bracket location. Initially done for the slant windshield cars IIRC, then it became the only frame ***embly used.

    Check out Steve Plucker's website if you'd like to read more about the progression of the model A frame start to end of production, a**** other things.

    http://www.plucks329s.org/

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  8. Mr T body
    Joined: Nov 2, 2005
    Posts: 2,227

    Mr T body
    Alliance Vendor
    from BHC AZ

    Excellent link! Though this is hardly a restoration, it's good to know what running production changes were made so I don't try to reinvent the wheel.
     
  9. Carter
    Joined: Mar 18, 2006
    Posts: 1,533

    Carter
    Member

    Yep, never hurts to learn a little. :D

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  10. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    The main changes (there were many small ones, detailed on Pluck site) were 1930 and the late '31 mentioned. As a rule of thumb, since the newest frame became the service replacement, later frames contained all holes needed for late and early bodies and so interchange is easier in that direction. Radiator pads are slightly higher on '28-9 than '30-31, factory just used shims for back interchange, forward interchange is more of a problem there too.
     
  11. mike bowling
    Joined: Jan 1, 2013
    Posts: 3,559

    mike bowling
    Member

    How about the steering box mounting holes on BOTH sides ( and a "knockout" in the firewall for same. Them Ford boys was definitely not asleep at the wheel. Lotsa holes for lotsa applications.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.