The Jalopy Journal
It would be for a Stovebolt, not a Jimmy. Quite a bit of difference in the port spacing between them....
The other Fatman's thread on here states the their lawyers are contacting people that are owed money to get that resolved. If you are on the list...
Was the plug under the rear main removed when the block was cleaned...? That one is often overlooked too...
The 151 engines had a 4" bore and 3" stroke, they were 1/2 of the 302 Chevy V8, thus 151 cubic inch. There is some interchange between the early...
Isn't he one of the Administrators of The Home Foundry forum. He has a video of that intake. He has several other videos and threads of other...
They would just tell you they are not interested and to take your engine somewhere else. I worked in a race engine shop as a machinist for over 15...
Bigger is not always better for sure! A group of us over on Inliners about 10 or 12 years ago debunked the age old myth that the closed chamber...
I think he meant 300 HP....
I was actually going to make casting patterns for a Weber dual side draft intake for this engine....just never got a good feel for which cylinder...
Devcon is a better epoxy product brand and it can be stiffened up even more by mixing/blending metal shavings into it as you mix the hardener in...
Yes it was! A good feature write up is in Tex Smith's Flathead Ford book. Very innovative and awesome power from such a vintage engine...
X2....no one will ever one up the Flatfire engine!
Where in Tn...?
261's were cast in 1954 also.....the fact it has numbers on the distributor pad indicate it's a production block and not a service block cast in...
It's not just ARP bolts that make you have to resize the rods, it's the distortion of removing the bolt period that is as much of the cause...
Separate names with a comma.
The Jalopy Journal