Register now to get rid of these ads!

"Gowjobs": Depresion Era Performance and Early day hop-up tech

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by MrModelT, Aug 13, 2010.

  1. MrModelT
    Joined: Nov 11, 2008
    Posts: 2,745

    MrModelT
    Member

    That is a good call! The curveture on the botom however isn't quite right. The one in the old phot is cut down T..I just know it is.

    Mid 20's Dodge lower frames are also very similar...I have one on my T. The only issue is the side curves and the hinge studs are not right. Besides that they are damn near identical.

    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  2. chevydave1965
    Joined: May 2, 2010
    Posts: 369

    chevydave1965
    Member
    from Iowa

    AWESOME THREAD Mr model T !!
     
  3. Six Ball
    Joined: Oct 8, 2007
    Posts: 6,624

    Six Ball
    Member
    from Nevada

    Yes, I can see what you are saying the one in the old picture, a Ford we think, has two small curves on the ends and an ugly flat line in the middle. The Chevy has a single pleasing graceful curve from side to side.:D
     
    Outback likes this.
  4. Kume
    Joined: Jan 23, 2010
    Posts: 1,002

    Kume
    Member

    Here are some picks that might help.

    The 1924-26 chev posts can be made to fit a T cowl with a bit of work but cross section of chev posts is square while T is rounded.

    I think the windscreen frames are also very similar.

    1927 & 28 chev posts sit higher on the cowl than T or 24-26 chev so very difficult to adapt.


    Kume
     

    Attached Files:

    • A.jpg
      A.jpg
      File size:
      449.9 KB
      Views:
      433
    • B.jpg
      B.jpg
      File size:
      508 KB
      Views:
      498
    bct likes this.
  5. noboD
    Joined: Jan 29, 2004
    Posts: 8,810

    noboD
    Member

    What year did they start making Maypops? He's got one on the front.
     
  6. denis4x4
    Joined: Apr 23, 2005
    Posts: 4,343

    denis4x4
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Colorado

    When I ordered my Zipper, Darrell offered two windshield posts. One was laid back and the other was more upright like the one in the picture. While the laid back version looks better, it was rather worthless while driving!
     

    Attached Files:

  7. need louvers ?
    Joined: Nov 20, 2008
    Posts: 12,903

    need louvers ?
    Member

    Ha! Just consumed a large part of the morning reading back through the early days of this thread! I just had a couple of deals happen this week that might actually make my "speedster" happen in the near future. I'm building a new frame for a customers full fendered '25 touring and have been given the old one, and punching about 75 louvers has netted me a very nice Model "A" front suspension with a pair of very nice 21" wheels. A friend has committed a nice running "A" engine to this deal, and I have a very nice early '32 rear axle and "T" rear spring. Trying to decide if I want to use one of the touring front halves I have with a cut down back piece or make a more single seat racer type body. It won't be a accurate "T" anything, but should be damned cool either way about it.
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  8. 64 DODGE 440
    Joined: Sep 2, 2006
    Posts: 4,432

    64 DODGE 440
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from so cal

    I'd go with a two seat version, it's always fun to scare a friend. Besides, my wife would prefer to be able to ride shotgun.:)
     
    Outback likes this.
  9. Indian
    Joined: Nov 6, 2008
    Posts: 13

    Indian
    Member
    from Sweden

    Here's my primitive pickup built from mostly 1926 Model T parts. Got it finished 0600 saturday morning, slept for three hours, test drove it half a mile and adjusted the transmission bands, then it was off to a rod meet /barn dance 50 miles away. It's running better the more I drive it. No starter, no fan, no pumps and no trouble :) (may install a hand pump for fuel pressure for higher mounted carbs later on..) primitiv pickup hayloft.jpg
     
    Memphis235, J.Ukrop, Egor and 5 others like this.
  10. Anyone dealt with quarter elliptical springs for a T? I am planning on using some either on the front or the rear. Which would be a better way of going? I am still in the planning phase but this is the idea I am going for.
     

    Attached Files:

    Egor likes this.
  11. rodney woolnough
    Joined: Mar 11, 2008
    Posts: 131

    rodney woolnough
    Member
    from tasmania

    this is my little car i dont know a lot about its history yet i think it was built around 38 in Michigan
     

    Attached Files:

  12. MrModelT
    Joined: Nov 11, 2008
    Posts: 2,745

    MrModelT
    Member


    I like it Rodney :) Give us some more info....what is it running?
     
  13. KKrod
    Joined: Jun 20, 2010
    Posts: 1,458

    KKrod
    Member

    ModifiedNumber6jmedium.jpg Guys, here is another Model T. I think this is about 1939. This was Karl Orr's car. I am curious, what frame is it running? I am really enjoying this thread.
    View attachment 2757590
     
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2014
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  14. -Brent-
    Joined: Nov 20, 2006
    Posts: 7,708

    -Brent-
    Member

    This stuff has really been on my mind, lately. While doing some homework on exhausts I came across this thread and had to bump it.
     
    MrModelT and bct like this.
  15. bct
    Joined: Apr 4, 2005
    Posts: 3,172

    bct
    Member

    If that's the hole in the frame rail for the steering box under the lower rad tube ,it has four rivet holes around it like a chevy mount. Possibly others too tho. I like how the rear kick flows into the usually missing bun panel.
     
    MrModelT likes this.
  16. MrModelT
    Joined: Nov 11, 2008
    Posts: 2,745

    MrModelT
    Member

    I'm thinking early Chevy as well, moded with a T or A rear cross member (for a transverse Ford banjo) and parallel leaves up front with a Chevy axle.

    That setup, the "3-Springer" style was fairly popular in that period....1933-'36.

    It's also running an A motor with a Crager or Riley OHV.....
     
  17. MrModelT
    Joined: Nov 11, 2008
    Posts: 2,745

    MrModelT
    Member

    Thanks Brent! This thread is (and can be) a great resource for 1929-1939 speed, Hop Up and racing tech.

    If anyone has anything they want to add....please do!
     
    Outback likes this.
  18. bct
    Joined: Apr 4, 2005
    Posts: 3,172

    bct
    Member

    If you look again , I think its hairpins up front. The frame is bobbed front and back for sure
     
  19. denis4x4
    Joined: Apr 23, 2005
    Posts: 4,343

    denis4x4
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Colorado

    image.jpg image.jpg Here are some "Gow" jobs at the Speedster Reunion at Speedway last week
     
    kidcampbell71 likes this.
  20. Kume
    Joined: Jan 23, 2010
    Posts: 1,002

    Kume
    Member

    This little beauty showed up on prewarcar

    _1447679251_resized_1927_ford-470.jpg
     
  21. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,228

    The37Kid
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    WOW! That is one nice looking Roadster, thanks for posting Kume. Is that plate 1927 or 1937? Bob
     
  22. Kume
    Joined: Jan 23, 2010
    Posts: 1,002

    Kume
    Member

  23. 37...

    1937 CA License Plate 1.jpg
    ca-license-plates-1927.jpg
     
  24. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,228

    The37Kid
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Thanks! If it had been a '27 it would have been a new or one year old T, in 1937 it would have been a bit outdated speed wise. I really like that dropped front axle. Bob
     
  25. flyin-t
    Joined: Dec 29, 2004
    Posts: 1,586

    flyin-t
    Member

    Damn, what a great looking roadster.
     
  26. MrModelT
    Joined: Nov 11, 2008
    Posts: 2,745

    MrModelT
    Member

    Dat axle though.... :D

    The plates are definitely '37....so that means this is the last "Hoorah" for the Gowjob. The aggressive axle drop is cool..but really narrows the front end ALLOT!
     
    Outback likes this.
  27. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,228

    The37Kid
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Just noticed some early T features, this is a 26-27 T Roadster on an early 1920's chassis.Bob
     
  28. Inked Monkey
    Joined: Apr 19, 2011
    Posts: 1,844

    Inked Monkey
    Member

    Do you think that they really drove the car that much to wear off the tread on the tires? or is that how they came? I wouldn't think dirt and gravel would cause a tire to go bald.
     
  29. The37Kid
    Joined: Apr 30, 2004
    Posts: 32,228

    The37Kid
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The wheels look to be stock Ford wires from 1926-27, if they were new in '27 they have ten years worth of use in that photo. It could have been driven on paved city or town roads, so he was on his way to driving the tires off it. Bob
     
  30. MrModelT
    Joined: Nov 11, 2008
    Posts: 2,745

    MrModelT
    Member

    Those tires are probably all they had. It was a Depression.... New tires for an old car were expensive. They were all most likely used.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.