Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 62 Chrysler 300 Rescued from A Storage Unit

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Insane 1, Aug 27, 2014.

  1. woodbutcher
    Joined: Apr 25, 2012
    Posts: 3,309

    woodbutcher
    Member

    :D Nice score.Enjoy.
    Good luck.Have fun.Be safe.
    Leo
     
  2. mgtstumpy
    Joined: Jul 20, 2006
    Posts: 9,279

    mgtstumpy
    Member

    Nice score, huge land barge
     
  3. tfeverfred
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 15,788

    tfeverfred
    Member Emeritus

    Awesome.;)
     
  4. Jimbo17
    Joined: Aug 19, 2008
    Posts: 3,959

    Jimbo17
    Member

    Very Cool garage find.

    Saving another old car is always a good thing.

    Jimbo
     
  5. rockable
    Joined: Dec 21, 2009
    Posts: 5,060

    rockable
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Whoo Hoo! Jackpot! Congratulations! A factory Custom, for sure.
     
  6. scrap metal 48
    Joined: Sep 6, 2009
    Posts: 6,128

    scrap metal 48
    Member

    WOW!! Great find...
     
  7. rjgideon
    Joined: Sep 12, 2005
    Posts: 573

    rjgideon
    Member

    And a photo under the hood, please. :)
     
  8. swifty
    Joined: Dec 25, 2005
    Posts: 2,583

    swifty
    Member

    Is there a story to this find? We want all the little details then some pics of it all cleaned up.
     
  9. Mr48chev
    Joined: Dec 28, 2007
    Posts: 35,967

    Mr48chev
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    That looks like a nice one. They were a hell of a road burner in their day. I'm like some of the others and what to see the after it had a bath and a buff photos.
     
  10. Insane 1
    Joined: Feb 13, 2005
    Posts: 974

    Insane 1
    Member
    from Ennis TX

    If I would have thought about it this would have been a perfect candidate.

    Okay, okay... I was teasing the reveal a bit!

    It took a little bit to bring the paint back, not going to lie, but still can do a little more.
    Now don't hate on the wheels, but I had them and thought they looked pretty good on her.

    DSC_0417.JPG
    DSC_0419.JPG
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2014
  11. J. A. Miller
    Joined: Dec 30, 2010
    Posts: 2,339

    J. A. Miller
    ALLIANCE MEMBER
    from Central NY

  12. bradshaw
    Joined: Jan 14, 2009
    Posts: 222

    bradshaw
    Member
    from ontario

  13. ClayMart
    Joined: Oct 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,793

    ClayMart
    Member

    Beautiful job on the clean-up! :cool:

    I just realized how much these cars looked like they had a '61 Chevy bubbletop roof grafted onto them, especially from that rear angle shot. :eek:
     
  14. rockable
    Joined: Dec 21, 2009
    Posts: 5,060

    rockable
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Do that interior up in red and that car is totally hot. The wheels are ok with me.
     
  15. xpletiv
    Joined: Jul 9, 2008
    Posts: 938

    xpletiv
    Member
    from chiburbs

    Isn't the interior already red?o_O

    and... Holy **** that looks nice!!
    How many bills was that? Ballpark range? So I can hate you some more.;)
     
  16. HEMI32
    Joined: Sep 6, 2006
    Posts: 8,570

    HEMI32
    Member

    The '62 Chrysler 300 Sport hardtops came from the factory with a 383ci V8.

    If it was a '62 Chrysler 300 H (letter car), then it would have come from the factory with a 413ci V8 ... with in-line dual 4bbl carbs (i.e., no cross ram intakes).
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2014
  17. HEMI32
    Joined: Sep 6, 2006
    Posts: 8,570

    HEMI32
    Member

    @Hnstray -

    Here's a handy reference for the Chrysler 300 letter / non-letter cars:
    • '55 C 300 = 331ci HEMI V8
    • '56 300 B = 354ci HEMI V8
    • '57 300 C = 392ci HEMI V8
    • '58 300 D = 392ci HEMI V8
    • '59 300 E = 413ci V8
    • '60 300 F = 413ci V8 with cross ram intake
    • '61 300 G = 413ci V8 with cross ram intake
    • '62 300 H = 413ci V8 / '62 300 (non-letter) = 383ci V8
    • '63 300 J = 413ci V8 / '63 300 (non-letter) = 383ci V8
    • '64 300 K = 413ci V8 / '64 300 (non-letter) = 383ci V8
    • '65 300 L = 413ci V8 / '65 300 (non-letter) = 383ci V8
     
    Last edited: Aug 28, 2014
  18. stillrunners
    Joined: Aug 27, 2009
    Posts: 10,586

    stillrunners
    Member
    from dallas

    lucky dog....yes the find story?....load it up and bring it to the Mopar Mini Nationals in Garland on Saturday....
     
  19. tommyd
    Joined: Dec 10, 2010
    Posts: 11,999

    tommyd
    Member
    from South Indy

    NOT hating the wheels or anything else about that car.
     
    loudbang likes this.
  20. Ebbsspeed
    Joined: Nov 11, 2005
    Posts: 6,479

    Ebbsspeed
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    The Sonoramic intake was no longer standard on the 300's in '62, but was an available option until '64.
     
    HEMI32 likes this.
  21. 57 Fargo
    Joined: Jan 22, 2012
    Posts: 6,181

    57 Fargo
    Member

    Damn!! Good score!


    Posted using the Full Custom H.A.M.B. App!
     
  22. Insane 1
    Joined: Feb 13, 2005
    Posts: 974

    Insane 1
    Member
    from Ennis TX

    Thanks. I thought about taking it, but going to head to invasion (not w the car) Sat. to hang out. I'll take it next year if it don't fall in line w Invasion. As for loading it up, I drive mine. Car runs good, brakes are the biggest thing it needs, it stops, but barely. Looking to do a drop spindle and add big brakes all the way around. After that, keep it clean and drive it.
     
  23. Taillight lenses on those are tough, the top flat portion really is subject to sun fade and cracking and so forth.
     
  24. slammed
    Joined: Jun 10, 2004
    Posts: 8,150

    slammed
    Member

    The car turned out very nice. 'Hate' is over used term. Some Supremes or Radir 15's will finish this off nicely. And a 3/2 drop.
     
  25. Hnstray
    Joined: Aug 23, 2009
    Posts: 12,357

    Hnstray
    Member
    from Quincy, IL

    Uuhhh, that should be ............

    "I just realized how much it looks like Chevy (GM) copied the 1959 thru 1962 MOPAR bubble top design". :D

    Ray


    P.S. I like the wheels too......
     
  26. 55Brodie
    Joined: Dec 15, 2008
    Posts: 746

    55Brodie
    Member

    Your Chizzler is bad-***, period.
     
  27. NMCarNut
    Joined: Nov 28, 2009
    Posts: 638

    NMCarNut
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Nice car!!
    As Hemi32 stated, a 383 two barrel ("rated" 305 HP) was standard with a 413 with single four (340 HP) or dual fours (380 HP) the optional engines. Also as stated, after 1955 the 1962 was the first year Chrysler offered a non-letter version which for the first time available also in 4 door hardtop and sedan along with the 2 door and convertible. While the 2 door hardtop was the highest production only 11,341 were made.
    Enough for history, now drive the wheels off it!
     
  28. loveoftiki
    Joined: Nov 11, 2006
    Posts: 9,160

    loveoftiki
    Member
    from Livonia,Mi

    Very cool...,the more I see these Mopars the more they grow on me
     
  29. One other minor correction; Chrysler used this body shell from 1960 through 1964 with various changes (and as Dodge, DeSoto and Plymouth models also).
     
  30. ClayMart
    Joined: Oct 26, 2007
    Posts: 7,793

    ClayMart
    Member

    You're right! It's just so seldom that you see one of these cars as a 2dr hardtop. :oops:

    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.