Register now to get rid of these ads!

1952-59 Ford Points to electronic conversion

Discussion in 'Off Topic Hot Rods & Customs' started by JeffB2, Aug 24, 2014.

  1. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    Lately issues have come up with some aftermarket conversions failing and folks getting stuck out on the road,that would ****.Then you find out the local parts house does not have replacement parts in stock for more frustration :mad::mad: So why not do it this way and stay 100% Ford: http://home.earthlink.net/~rcfaulconer/duraspark/eec.htm
     
  2. rick55
    Joined: Aug 25, 2009
    Posts: 119

    rick55
    Member

    Greenbird56 who posts on this forum is a guru on this conversion. He has numerous posting on yblocksforever.com on his methods. Lots of illustrations and photos.
     
  3. danman55
    Joined: Dec 20, 2008
    Posts: 1,011

    danman55
    Member

    good post Jeff - excellent information. I run an ACCEL points eliminator in every Y block I have built and have had 0 issues, but I always look at the Duraspark modification and am tempted to try it out on the next motor I build. Maybe I will have to do that someday.
     
  4. Rui
    Joined: Sep 17, 2012
    Posts: 1,786

    Rui
    Member

    My points run good and I've got spares, but, given the known advantages, I'm tempted.
    I'm all ears..
     
  5. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,754

    bobss396
    Member

    I always carried extra of whatever I needed in the glove box and the necessary tools. Points, condensor, HEI module.. always carry a spare.
     
  6. fordsbyjay
    Joined: Nov 4, 2009
    Posts: 755

    fordsbyjay
    Member
    from Lafayette

    While I could see how HEI is a lot better than points those Ford boxes are notoriously unreliable. That would be the last thing I would swap to. However, the Duraspark distributors are excellent so I would run the newer distributor & parts and use a GM module or an MSD unit for the electronics side but that is just me. The GM module is much smaller (to store a spare if you want) and is available at your local parts store.

    http://www.carbdford.com/tech/HEI/hei.htm

    http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/1311_convert_a_ford_or_chrysler_ignition_to_gm_hei/
     
    Last edited: Aug 25, 2014
  7. Wario777
    Joined: Apr 14, 2014
    Posts: 24

    Wario777
    Member

    im planning on putting the pertronix setup into my 272. its been running really sluggish lately. out of nowhere is boggy. a buddy that builds hot rods swears by them.
     
  8. JeffB2
    Joined: Dec 18, 2006
    Posts: 9,665

    JeffB2
    Member
    from Phoenix,AZ

    You may want to look into the Accel unit danman suggested over the last year Petronix has begun to have failure issues like other companies (guess why?) The Accel is also more wallet friendly.
     
  9. rick55
    Joined: Aug 25, 2009
    Posts: 119

    rick55
    Member

    Years ago I bought a unit off Danman55 on eBay. Been working great since. I haven't had the same luck with Pertronix in the past.
     
  10. rick55
    Joined: Aug 25, 2009
    Posts: 119

    rick55
    Member

    For the initiated, the Accell and Mallory units are merely switches which helps their reliability. They have a small led which emits a light which is interrupted by slots in a plate affixed to the bottom of the rotor ****on. This intermittent light is detected by the base unit. The only downside to the Accell is that it will not fit the early mechanical Ford Distributors, ie the ball bearing based unit with the straight armed vacuum canister as this fouls the mounting base.
     
  11. HOTRODPRIMER
    Joined: Jan 3, 2003
    Posts: 64,922

    HOTRODPRIMER
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    I will play devils advocate,while I know a guy that has the Accel set up Jeff is talking about and he hasn't experienced any problems whatsoever I have great service from the Petronix setup in both my '54 Ford with a 302 and my Deuce with a 327.

    I too have heard stories of failures recently,,mine have been on the road for several years. HRP
     
  12. Dobie Gillis
    Joined: Jun 3, 2013
    Posts: 322

    Dobie Gillis
    Member

    Anybody using the Accel unit with an OD trans? Any issues with the kickdown switch grounding the coil?
     
  13. TUCK66
    Joined: Jul 12, 2011
    Posts: 69

    TUCK66
    Member
    from CORONA,CA.

    I NEED TO BRING THIS BACK UP....if you convert to electronic do you not use vacuum advance do the electronic systems have centrifugal advance
     
  14. Dobie Gillis
    Joined: Jun 3, 2013
    Posts: 322

    Dobie Gillis
    Member

    If you're using an original type Loadomatic distributor there is no centrifugal advance. Converting it to electronic doesn't change that.
     
  15. TUCK66
    Joined: Jul 12, 2011
    Posts: 69

    TUCK66
    Member
    from CORONA,CA.

    ok...thanks dobie
     
  16. rick55
    Joined: Aug 25, 2009
    Posts: 119

    rick55
    Member

    Do yourself a favour get a late model distributor and run both vacuum and mechanical advance. The difference is remarkable when couple with a B manifold, 4 barrel carb and twin exhaust. The engine goes from being a sluggish old girl to a teenager.
     
  17. TUCK66
    Joined: Jul 12, 2011
    Posts: 69

    TUCK66
    Member
    from CORONA,CA.

    ITS A 54 239 will the late dizzy fit my early 239...and is there issues with pulling the dist.as in does the dist.drive the oil pump via a rod..is it attached to the dist. or can it fall in.....
     
  18. Dobie Gillis
    Joined: Jun 3, 2013
    Posts: 322

    Dobie Gillis
    Member

    The late dizzy will fit just fine, however you need to confirm which oil pump drive you have. The 239s originally had a tang drive. Some time in 1955, I believe, Ford changed the design to a hex drive. There's a good chance you have the later drive if the engine has been rebuilt. The pump drive will not fall out, the pump keeps it in place.
     
  19. TUCK66
    Joined: Jul 12, 2011
    Posts: 69

    TUCK66
    Member
    from CORONA,CA.

    so pull the dizzy and look at the drive its hex or a tang right...
     
  20. Dobie Gillis
    Joined: Jun 3, 2013
    Posts: 322

    Dobie Gillis
    Member

    Yup.The later dizzies with both vacuum and centrifugal advance will have the hex drive, so if you still have the tang drive oil pump rod you will need to get one for a hex drive.
     
  21. TUCK66
    Joined: Jul 12, 2011
    Posts: 69

    TUCK66
    Member
    from CORONA,CA.

    so I can change the tang type to hex drive..how do I do that...by the way thanks for all the info
     
  22. Dobie Gillis
    Joined: Jun 3, 2013
    Posts: 322

    Dobie Gillis
    Member

    You need the hex type pump drive rod. This courtesy of Y-Blockhead on the fordbarn forum:

    The oil pump drive shaft should be installed from the bottom with the pump. There should be a clip on the shaft ~1" from the bottom to prevent the shaft from being pulled out with the distributor.

    The shaft also should have a slightly beveled end that goes toward the distributor to help guide the shaft into the hole.

    Warning to those who buy an ARP oil pump shaft; They install the retaining clip on the wrong end. Hopefully they changed this by now, I haven't bought one in a couple of years. Easy to check BEFORE you install it.
     
    Last edited: Dec 1, 2014

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.