Register now to get rid of these ads!

Projects 66 c10 disc brake question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by Ratfink83, Aug 2, 2015.

  1. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    I'm sure this topic has brought most of us to the brink of insanity and beyond and just bringing it up may get me on a list of some sort, but I have a question about my 66 c10 that I have recently converted the front drums to 72 c10 spindles and five lug discs. I've read hours upon hours of threads, many visits to Oreillys and no one seems to go over the proper type of brake hose to use for this conversion. I have the 72 c10 brake hoses and they do not seem to be correct for this application. I know the disc brake kit that most venders sell comes with brake hoses that are "bolt on" with out having to modify the hard lines on the truck and they look nothing like the 72 hoses. If someone could steer me towards the right thread (if it exists) or even better help me with an answer I would greatly appreciate it. I'm generally an industrious individual, but I really want to shy away from making custom brake hoses for an application that supposedly already has a bolt on option. Thanks in advance!
     
  2. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,039

    squirrel
    Member

    huh, I'd probably get a hose for a 73 and make it fit? but I'm weird like that
     
  3. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    Squirrel, yeah I see there are some options like using a 73-87 brake hose or even later model ones, but those are way longer and too different. At least as far as I can tell. I may just be looking at the 72 hoses all wrong, but I've tried to mock them up in several different ways and it just doesn't look right. I just want to know what everyone else uses and what works best.
     
  4. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,039

    squirrel
    Member

    Oh, then you might have better luck on the 67-72 truck forum?

    I don't usually worry about what's best, or what other guys do, I just make things work on my own stuff.
     
  5. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    Squirrel, I could "make something work" but whether it's right or not is up for debate and I prefer not to guess or "make things work" when it comes to brakes. But thanks for the input. I may try the other forum.
     
  6. squirrel
    Joined: Sep 23, 2004
    Posts: 60,039

    squirrel
    Member

    I use my own judgement about stuff like this...whether or not "the internet" thinks it's best isn't really the final answer, either.

    If you're not confident in your abilities to make it work, you might need to get on the phone to one of the companies you mentioned that sells this stuff.
     
  7. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    I'm not worried about my ability. I just would rather get opinions or hear others experience with this issue rather than making a million trips to the parts store to see what works best. I'm just being over cautious. Can you blame me? I might call McGauphys tomorrow and see if they can help so I'll see what they say.
     
  8. DDDenny
    Joined: Feb 6, 2015
    Posts: 22,589

    DDDenny
    Member
    from oregon

    What would Macgyver do?
     
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2015
  9. ROADSTER1927
    Joined: Feb 14, 2009
    Posts: 3,292

    ROADSTER1927
    Member

    Take a caliper and your line size to a GOOD auto parts with the length you need. easypeasy, Gary;)
     
  10. captaintaytay
    Joined: May 24, 2011
    Posts: 1,205

    captaintaytay
    Member

    What is the problem, is it the look or function?
    Is it too long or too short?
    Should be a banjo fitting and a female fitting and a bracket.
    Like Gary said, "easypeasy"
     
  11. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    I uploaded some pics of the best I can do with the 72 hoses. It doesn't look too bad and doesn't pull taunt when extended, but it is an awkward position especially when I turn it to the inside. I just don't want it to bind up or prematurally wear out from being mispositioned. I guess I can go with this and just keep an eye on it. I hate to do that with brakes, but it seems no one has previous experience with this specific modification. I do appreciate the input either way.
     

    Attached Files:

  12. 62nova
    Joined: Jul 13, 2008
    Posts: 348

    62nova
    Member

    I used braided steel lines on my 65. After loosing my brakes from failed rubber hose I don't regret it. And they look cool !
     
  13. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    62nova, yeah a few have suggested that and I think that's the route I'm going to take. There's a Tompkins right down the street from my work so I may just cut to the chase and do that. Thanks!
     
  14. bobss396
    Joined: Aug 27, 2008
    Posts: 18,756

    bobss396
    Member

    I've always heard it was an easy-as-pie swap. Look at Inline Tube (link below), they have tons of hoses.
    http://www.inlinetube.com/#!rubber-brake-hoses/c1eim

    The Scarebird kit uses later 3/4 ton calipers. Maybe those are the hoses.
    https://scarebird.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=97&product_id=150

    I would try to find a parts house with a friendly counter guy who may be able to help. I think it would be absurd to have to make up hoses. You should be able to zero in on a length range pretty easily.
     
  15. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    Bobss396, yeah I got into this thinking it was a direct swap and easy as can be, but I had a few surprises along the way that made it not so quick and easy. It's no big deal, I just was expecting it to be more straight forward. And I know this is a custom install and can honestly use tons of different year, make and model of parts, but I'd prefer to keep it simple and one year parts swap if that makes sense. One can do this mod in any number of different ways, but I figured it's been done so many times I was hoping for more advice. That's why we have these message boards is to absorb others knowledge and past experience so we don't all have to do our own trials and testing. But thanks for the input either way!
     
  16. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    ALSO, 72 drivers side supply line/hard line is 3/8 and the p***enger side supplies a 7/16 line. So even the inlets on the one side is different. Back to the drawing board which is unfortunately going through all the different years and models on oreillys to find the correct length, size and proper ends to fit my application. Fml
     
  17. gimpyshotrods
    Joined: May 20, 2009
    Posts: 24,560

    gimpyshotrods
    ALLIANCE MEMBER

    Chuck the '72 stuff and get '73-'87 parts.

    You can even get '73-'87 rotors with 6-lugs, so you don't need to change the rear axles.
     
  18. XtechX
    Joined: Jul 22, 2014
    Posts: 74

    XtechX
    Member
    from Edmore, MI

    Check out the 60-66 chevy truck forum located at www.67-72chevytrucks.com it will have your answer plus the answer for any other questions or problems you could ever have. It's a great site with easy going people who love to help. This is a copy and paste from the site, I hope it helps
    Rubber brake hoses:
    * You must change to a disc brake style hose.
    * Early Cl***ic Enterprises, and other suspension vendors, make a "conversion" brake hose that will connect the disc brake caliper, to the original 63-66 brake hose steel line location.
    * 71-72 hoses is another option. (but I haven't personally confirmed if the steel line connection is the correct size).
    * Another option is to use 73-87 hoses, (cheaper to purchase), but they are much longer, and also may need fitting adapters.
    * Aftermarket steel braided hoses and AN fittings is another option.
     
  19. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    Gimpyshotrods, haha it's crossed my mind more than once haha. And Xtechx, yeah I have recently just sent my request to the administrator to join the 67-72 Chevy truck forum and will seek my answer there. And I haven't tried early cl***ic enterprises yet, but that's my next action I'm taking. Thanks for the help guys I'm really hoping to get this wrapped up soo so I can drive my truck again!
     
  20. onetrickpony
    Joined: Sep 21, 2010
    Posts: 863

    onetrickpony
    Member
    from Texas

    To do this properly, you have to change the brakes, the master cylinder, and the distribution block. When you do that, you need to change all the hard lines, too.

    On a 50 year old truck, changing out the steel lines is cheap insurance. Do the run to the rear while you are at it.
     
  21. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    Xtechx, early cl***ic enterprises sells the correct hoses for the 60-70 disc brake conversion for about $55. If I cannot find a cheaper solution I'll be going this route. At least I know these exist and are available. Thanks again!
     
    Jerrybigbird likes this.
  22. Ratfink83
    Joined: Nov 27, 2012
    Posts: 12

    Ratfink83
    Member

    Onetrickpony, yeah the ****py part of all of this is I just installed all new hardlines in this truck with a new dual master cylinder just six months ago when it had drums all around. Now I'm doing the five lug disc and it's just a pain to have to go back and redo my work just because of the brake hoses. I think I found my solution though.
     
  23. 26Troadster
    Joined: Nov 20, 2010
    Posts: 906

    26Troadster
    Member

    i just found this thread, but i'm no help as i don't remember what i did. i converted mine about 18 years ago. but if you find what worked for you then please share it so others may have a answer.
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.