Register now to get rid of these ads!

Technical Flathead fitment

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by snowroutes, Mar 1, 2016.

  1. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    I have a ford flathead that is anywhere from 1938 to about 1940 on a 35 to 40 frame and the previous owner put three front mounts under the water pump to clear the oil pan from the U bolts on the front crossmember. Does anybody have any idea why this is this way? Someone has told me I need the engine mount adapters for earlier frames I spent the $50 and they will not fix my problem
    ImageUploadedByH.A.M.B.1456850539.002454.jpg
     
  2. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Engine looks post-1938. have you figured out what frame is? It must be pre-1937 or engine would fall into place.
    '35-6 engine mounts are higher on engine, and so need the U-shaped Ford adapters to approximate the height of the extra biscuits. I think that must be the basic problem here...?
    Is engine bolted to a mounted transmission now, to fully set fore and aft location?
     
  3. patmanta
    Joined: May 10, 2011
    Posts: 3,882

    patmanta
    Member
    from Woburn, MA

    What is that flathead sitting in?
    Looks like a truck pump to me.

    Measure how much more room than one of those spacers you're going to need and get some .120" - .188" box or rectangular tubing, cut/fashion to taste, and drill it out.

    [​IMG]
     
    snowroutes likes this.
  4. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    Yeah Bruce everything is mounted inside a 36 Ford pick up with ******, torque tube, and rear end. What I am trying to do is drop the front of the motor down so that it will sit level. I'm not exactly sure on the year of the frame but I thought they were all the same from 35 to 40.
     
  5. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    I did buy the adapters for engine front support for 37 to 48 engine but my problem is the oil pan is going to hit that front crossmember
     
  6. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    With single sheave main pulley, they're likely p***enger pumps, but mounting leg is the same on both types. The Ford spacer, I think 41A prefix in the repro catalogs, should be the right thickness for what is probably a '35 or 6 frame.
    If you want a reference on right al***ude for motor it should be level and should clear if you put a rod through the hand-crank hole in grill and point it to center of crank pulley, with engine mounted at its rear end of course.
    Your '39 type crank pulley should occupy exactly same space as the truck's original engine except for its ceter snout, which should be irrelevant.
     
  7. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    Yes 41A is what I bought but I feel if I put those in there will maybe be 1/8 of an inch from the front U bolts hitting that pan.
     
  8. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Add a couple washers! And make sure you have good quality rubber that is rather hard. Some of the repro pads are very soft rubber, not at all like real Ford ones. The system is pretty solid, and you don't need a whole lot of clearance.
     
  9. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    Awesome Bruce Thanks! But the sad part is the front of the engine is still a little high. Any thoughts
     
  10. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    Don't know for sure, I only mess with '32 and 48...but I believe the 41 A adapter applies to '33-36 Fords retrofitted with 24 stud replacement motors and I don't think the al***ude difference was exactly the same!
    Squeeze adapter down in a vise or something! Or make a new one, as shown by Patmanta, out of whatever is the right thickness.
    I believe correct stack re Ford replacements is actual mount bolted as original to frame and into adapter with stock Ford through bolt, adapter bolted solid to water pump. Something else, '32-36 biscuit has a smaller shoulder where it fits into frame. Using a '37-48 piece might well elevate the mount away from frame a bit right there!
     
    snowroutes likes this.
  11. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    ImageUploadedByH.A.M.B.1456881027.302301.jpg
    That's the crossmember and that's about how far that needs to fit the spacers and mounts give it about 2 paper widths of clearance on the oil pan
     
  12. patmanta
    Joined: May 10, 2011
    Posts: 3,882

    patmanta
    Member
    from Woburn, MA

    I think your Oil Pan may be the real issue here.

    Can we see a pic of it?

    I'm not too familiar with parts for that gen of flathead, but I'm pretty sure there are a few different oil pans. I would try to find one with a good amount of relief up front and a rear sump.
     
    snowroutes likes this.
  13. alchemy
    Joined: Sep 27, 2002
    Posts: 22,680

    alchemy
    Member

    I don't know the answer to your problem, but I can tell you it's not a '40 frame. They have a raised boss on the crossmember, higher than the rail right next to it. I'd guess '38 and '39 frames would be the same also. So you must have a '35-36-ish frame.
     
    snowroutes likes this.
  14. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    You bet as soon as I get home I'll snap a picture, thanks.
     
  15. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    I was told 1935 - 1940 were the same frame. Good to know.
     
  16. Bruce Lancaster
    Joined: Oct 9, 2001
    Posts: 21,681

    Bruce Lancaster
    Member Emeritus

    '35-40 frames are the same shape, but there are dozens of differences, some of which you just found! Along with mount changes between '36 and '37, these frames over the years had 3 different brakes systems, 2 1/2 different steerings, 2 different clutch lever systems, at least two very different trans mounts, variations for all the different radiators and front sheetmetal, etc.
    This stuff is only unimportant on a street rod where all functional parts are cut away and replaced with modern stuff.
    On the pan...I think there is very little difference in shape between all the '35-48 pans.
     
  17. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    Yeah I just found that out I've been doing research on front crossmembers from 35 to 40 and holy smokes there are a ton of differences! You guys rock thank you so much for your help and ***istance
     
  18. snowroutes
    Joined: Feb 10, 2014
    Posts: 50

    snowroutes

    ImageUploadedByH.A.M.B.1456965621.620804.jpg ImageUploadedByH.A.M.B.1456965632.140000.jpg
    Not the best photos but I've done a little bit of research and I truly believe 839 or 40 crossmember is the ticket now I just need to find one of those for under 50 bucks
     
  19. First I thought you may have had a set of later merc pumps, that was my only answer. I would just build some solid steel spacers and ditch that hokey 3 rubber set up, it'll sway around like a mother****er set up like that.
     
  20. theHIGHLANDER
    Joined: Jun 3, 2005
    Posts: 10,728

    theHIGHLANDER
    Member

    Curious, how exactly does a mother****er sway? Is it something like this or does she have to be a mother? Just curious...:cool:
     
    Pocket Nick likes this.
  21. It's kinda like a mating ritual of some sort.
     
    snowroutes likes this.

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.